18 pointsby Bender8 hours ago3 comments
  • unixhero7 hours ago
    And the IPO valuation rises
  • Dig1t6 hours ago
    ULA uses expendable rockets. From an environmental perspective and also just a basic efficiency perspective this is a no-brainer.

    If the Air Force were flying cargo across the country why would we want them to be using cargo planes that get destroyed after a single use?

  • bell-cot7 hours ago
    Might anyone have a view under the hood here, and not be under NDA, to comment on why ULA hasn't replaced Northrop Grumman with a less failure-prone SRB supplier?
    • LarsAlereon6 hours ago
      I can't think of any other remaining large solid rocket manufacturer in the USA, NG bought them all.
    • eugenekay7 hours ago
      They would have to admit that they were wrong to switch away from using the proven Aerojet-Rocketdyne AJ-60A boosters (developed for and still flying with the Atlas V family).