152 pointsby mellosouls8 hours ago10 comments
  • contubernio6 hours ago
    Bambaataa was a serial sexual abuser and everybody in the rap scene knew it back in the day (early 90s) same way everyone knew about R. Kelly (I ran a rap program on the radio in 92-94).
    • nunez5 hours ago
      Wow, had no idea. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afrika_bambaataa#Child_sexual_...

      Massively influential guy to hip hop, but what a shame.

    • torben-friis3 hours ago
      Damn. As someone half the world away I just knew him as a pioneer, news didn't travel enough to know anything about the personal lives of artists in the early 00s.

      No idea about the allegations until now, which means the news doubly suck.

    • poisonarena3 hours ago
      Imagine if a rap artist was a gang member, armed robber or murderer. That would be even worse, and I would never listen to their music.
      • kstrauser2 hours ago
        I can imagine scenarios where decent people in tough environments might be compelled to join a gang, rob, or even murder. That doesn’t make it ok, but it makes it at least understandable.

        I’m unable to imagine a reason why decent people might be compelled to rape children, let alone serially.

        • defrost2 hours ago
          Well, if it gets normalised during childhood, then it frequently occurs during teen years and adulthood.

          You can see some discussion of that in the Australian Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse (2017)

          * https://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/final-report

          There is the position, of course, that a sexually abused child that reaches teen years or adulthood is no longer a "decent person" .. which is an interesting transition to dwell on.

          • kstrauser2 hours ago
            That makes it more understandable, but he lost a trial that said he was raping a child when he was 38 years old.

            Someone abused as a child who does sketchy things in their early 20s is tragic. Someone doing the same when they’re nearly 40 is a whole lot harder to dismiss. Like, you don’t make it to that age without hearing a lot of people along the way saying not to rape children.

            • defrost2 hours ago
              Oh, please, don't think I'm making any excuses here .. but I was around and about the evidence management side of a five deep dive into institutional childhood abuse ... the various things that went down tend to explain a lot of early following behaviour once some kind of distance from early abuse is made.

              You're right to flag ongoing and persistent shitty behaviour as unacceptable - even assigning blame there gets problematic as there absolutely is an element of "would they be less bad had they had more support on escape", but you can't be giving a pass forever.

              Bloody Trolley problems .. this is one of several areas with no good choices, no easy solutions.

            • chiefalchemist2 hours ago
              If only human behavior was that simple. The DSM-5 is filled with diseases of the mind. Choice often isn’t as cut and dry as we would like to believe.

              No one wakes up and thinks “I want to suffer today of _____.” [1] AndI want others to suffer along with me.

              That said, perhaps the universe is binary? Perhaps evil, pure evil does exist? Perhaps there’s no to stopping evil than “just say no”? It’s hard to say.

              [1] Insert mental, physical a/o spiritual illness here.

          • 472828472 hours ago
            There is also the theory that it serves as a reenactment of one’s own abuse. Trying to find peace and return to safety by replaying the scene, this time not as helpless victim but perpetrator: in control.

            Victims of sexual abuse thus often are haunted by “fantasies” of abuse but avoiding the victim position; the trap is to identify with the fantasies. All too often, they’ve been told it is their fault, they wanted it etc, so the imagined replay “proves the original perpetrator right”.

            The only way to break the circle seems to be to fully go into the fantasy and process the victim position, with support of a well-meaning presence (typically a therapist but in another reality it could be friends or family).

        • poisonarena2 hours ago
          couldn't you apply your exact same argument for them?
        • redsocksfan452 hours ago
          [dead]
      • watwut2 hours ago
        Known murderer and robber rap artists are in prison.
      • vr463 hours ago
        • poisonarena2 hours ago
          this is not a valid criticism of the point im making
          • vr46an hour ago
            This is exactly the point you're making
      • redsocksfan452 hours ago
        [dead]
    • sjtgraham6 hours ago
      What did you do about it at the time?
      • contubernio4 hours ago
        Not a reasonable question. All my information was third hand at best.

        We didn't play Bambaataa, R Kelly or Tupac (convicted rapist) records. That's about all a radio station could do. Can't state what legally speaking were merely rumors on the air without facing problems. All you can do is not support them commercially, which we did.

        • lostlogin3 hours ago
          I’d say it is a reasonable question, with a really good answer.
        • poisonarena3 hours ago
          [flagged]
          • kstrauser2 hours ago
            This is such an odd hill to die on.
      • dbcooperan hour ago
        A friend of mine has worked in TV and film for decades. Many times he has told me about rumoured offenders (typically after they are arrested), but other than avoiding working on productions with them what are his choices? Trying to do a completely ridiculous "citizen's arrest"?
      • 5 hours ago
        undefined
      • chris_wot5 hours ago
        The same thing you did. What sort of question is that?
  • gosub10032 minutes ago
    This brings up a point I often ponder: should the records of horrific criminals be cancelled? Consider the two extremes:

    A) artist is never played again, no more royalties are paid. Nobody gets to enjoy the music.

    B) the artist's estate is sold to a victims compensation trust, that collects, say, $4m/year that gets distributed to victims and charities. You still hear their song occasionally on the radio and gradually forget about their plight over the years.

    Which one brings the victims closer to justice?

  • Klaster_17 hours ago
    • defrost7 hours ago
      Contemporaneously: World Destruction - Afrika Bambaataa & John Lydon (Released on: 31/12/1984) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yoXGMSOIrIs
    • jimt12347 hours ago
      Afrika Bambaataa is a major reason I fell in love with hip hop back around '82. Further, I've always felt "perfect beat" is a much better song than the more popular "planet rock". Back then, "planet rock" was for regular folk, "perfect beat" was for the breakers. Regular folk would be dancing on the floor, just like normal, and then, later in the evening, the DJ would drop "perfect beat" and it was on - specifically, this part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=229&v=rHQ11l4uiM4 . The dance floor would clear, otherwise you'd catch a foot from some dude spinning around. Good times.

      I'm still trying to digest all the s3xual abuse allegations against Bam later in life.

      RIP Bam

      • wahnfrieden7 hours ago
        The allegations became public later in his life but the incidents go back to the 80s and 90s, his whole career. Rest In Piss indeed
  • shevy-java38 minutes ago
    Awww. Oldschool bboy music in the 1990s and before.
  • nailer3 hours ago
    I got into this guy via this Leftfield collab, it’s a great video: https://youtu.be/KvxbFWY2Hsc sad to hear he was a creep.
  • Teever7 hours ago
    I fell into a job bussing tables and porting alcohol at a local live music venue when I was 19 and I worked there off and on over seven years.

    As much as I love live music after a while it just sort of became a job, but every now and again an incredible musician would come through and I wouldn’t know until I showed up for my shift and I asked my coworkers who was playing that night.

    One night I come in and my jaw drops when find out it’s fucking DJ Africa Bambaataa! Now I’m not big into hip hop but I had listened to a few of his albums and I knew his music was phenomenal and I was shocked such a legend was playing in my town.

    The crazy part is only like 100 people showed up out of a capacity of like 800 but every single one of those people could dance.

    The venue had an old sound booth that was attached to ceiling and was accessible with a rickety old spiral staircase, as it was so slow that night I spent most of my time up there just soaking in that experience.

    I’ve seen a lot of live shows in my day but that one stands out.

    • kristopolous4 hours ago
      yeah, he was skilled. Got to see him a few years ago.
  • nixy6 hours ago
    Good riddance.
  • gvv4 hours ago
    Hacker news?
  • crakenzak7 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • mind-blight7 hours ago
      Because it's Afrika Bambaataa. He invented entirely new techniques for making music - which is already enough for him to be relevant here - that influences what many of us listen to daily.
      • jimt12347 hours ago
        Back in the early-80s, after learning about sampled music, most people's next question was, "Who the fuck is Kraftwerk?" LOL
  • nslsm4 hours ago
    Could be discussing his great, ground-breaking music, and instead all I see here is homophobia.
    • prmoustache2 hours ago
      Issue is not homophobia but grooming and sexual abuse.

      French ex rapper Solo mentionned in his book he witnessed and was himself groomed and abused at 17 by Afrika Bambaataa and all Bambaataa's entourage knew about that and just chose to either ignore or even facilitate it. It seemed to have been an open secret within at least NYC hip hop circle and the Zulu Nation in general which chose to ignore and even attack the victims who speaked out.

    • an hour ago
      undefined
    • jaapz3 hours ago
      Where's this homophobia exactly?