95 pointsby vermilingua9 hours ago12 comments
  • sateesh20 minutes ago
    As someone who doesn't know/watched "Mean Girls" this seems confusing. Also I don't think it is fair to assume that reading of a blog post makes one to understand Raft better, at best they pique one's interest to learn more about it. IMHO Reading/re-reading of the Raft paper and working through an instructional implementation like (https://github.com/eliben/raft) provides a better understanding.
  • BSTRhino8 hours ago
    That is so fetch!

    In all honesty though, I quite enjoyed how this article was written. Is there a listing somewhere of articles written like this, with algorithms or concepts explained using analogies to pop culture?

  • dang5 hours ago
    Previously:

    Raft Is So Fetch: The Raft Consensus Algorithm Explained Through Mean Girls - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33071069 - Oct 2022 (53 comments)

    Raft Is So Fetch: The Raft Consensus Algorithm Explained Through Mean Girls - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22520040 - March 2020 (4 comments)

  • cocodill6 hours ago
    I looked through the gifs and ended up understanding even less than before.
  • trick-or-treat6 hours ago
    They need to stop trying to make fetch a thing.
  • EdwardDiego7 hours ago
    Which movie would you use to explain Paxos?
    • interloxia6 hours ago
      "Chat generate a blog post on paxos but explain it through Mad Max: Fury Road"
      • defrost6 hours ago
        The Postman (1997)

        restoration of packet messaging across unreliable transport.

  • xyzal7 hours ago
    As a lover or Raft Consensus Algorithm, now I have to watch Mean Girls I guess.
  • 7ean hour ago
    Given that Raft was rederived simply because the authors couldn’t originally understand Paxos, I’m not surprised to see this.
  • up2isomorphism3 hours ago
    But why?
  • SomaticPirate6 hours ago
    “Chat generate me an explanation blog posts on the Raft consensus algorithm… but explain it through mean girls”
  • skeptrune6 hours ago
    lmao, i love this
  • diorrkrk6 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • trick-or-treat6 hours ago
      Is that your real take? The girls have the power in that movie they manipulate the boys not the other way around. The adults are oblivious (except for Tina). There is no patriarchy.
    • DarkNova66 hours ago
      This is another way of telling us you haven't seen the movie without telling us you haven't seen the movie.
    • lwhi6 hours ago
      You're a virgin who can't drive!

      Admittedly, this is Clueless (and way harsh) .. but I couldn't help myself.

    • defrost6 hours ago
      It ably demonstrates the propensity of IT industry drive by commenters to be confidently, totally, utterly incorrect in every aspect of what they opine.
    • eru6 hours ago
      At the risk of going even more off-topic:

      > Mean Girls demonstrate how patriarchy shapes young girls, [...]

      Of course, young girls have no agency and the only thing shaping them is the mean patriarchy... /s

      • lynx974 hours ago
        Supposedly having no agency and being opressed seems to be the universal narrative, even with groups that are not even a minority. It gets worse with real minorities. But I know an increasing number of women who are fed up with this victimhood mentality. Its a slipery slope. Because once you believe in you being a victim, you likely reduce your effort to take matters into your own hand. And there is even a feedback loop. Because once you start whining, people perceive you as such and a stereotype is reinforced.
        • lwhi4 hours ago
          Those people are a good candidates for the burn book.