It turns out I had uploaded the wrong file, so I submitted a “technical” response to the outright mockery.
I decided to leave it at that because I had lost my conviction to help them or show them a new patent pending way to resolve vulnerabilities and to add capabilities to any software including AI models because of the initial feedback.
Then I got another response that told me to use another agent because my system was fake and they get these types of claims all the time and he tried to be a little nicer.
So I downloaded their most recent version and applied my system to it and then this time submitted the file again but in a full zip with all docs and licensing so they could inspect the difference. Then I used every known AI model to validate my claims (except Claude because my sub resets at 8pm) and submitted that to them.
This is the most interesting thread you’ve ever seen and the outright mockery from a maintainer of their repo was the most unprofessional response I’ve ever received from any company.
Now I invite HN to look at the files and the evidence I’ve submitted that shows a new way to change codes output and protect its most sensitive inputs all while not changing a single line of code in the original software.
I promise you’ve never seen an exchange like this. I even submitted my own response to the mockery by outlining what I believe the secret of life is in a code that only a developer can understand.