73 pointsby adrianhon5 hours ago24 comments
  • ronanfarrow3 hours ago
    Ronan Farrow here. Andrew Marantz and I spent 18 months on this investigation. Happy to answer questions about the reporting.
    • xnx5 minutes ago
      In depth reporting is great. This is a really tricky topic to cover over the course of 18 months. A year and a half ago OpenAI was ascendant, now it's -at best- stalling and, more likely, trending toward irrelevant.
    • cs7022 hours ago
      Thank you for coming on HN and offering to answer questions.[a]

      This is a fantastic piece, very timely, evidently well-researched, and also well-written. Judging by the little that I know, it's accurate. Thank you for doing the work and sharing it with the world.

      OpenAI may be in a more tenuous competitive position than many people realize. Recent anecdotal evidence suggests the company has lost its lead in the AI race to Anthropic.[b]

      Many people here, on HN, who develop software prefer Claude, because they think it's a better product.[c]

      Is your understanding of OpenAI's current competitive position similar?

      ---

      [a] You may want to provide proof online that you are who you say you are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet%2C_nobody_know...

      [b] https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2026-04-01/openais-sh...

      [c] For example, there are 2x more stories mentioning Claude than ChatGPT on HN over the past year. Compare https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYear&page=0&prefix=tru... to https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastYear&page=0&prefix=tru...

    • cmiles82 hours ago
      Great reporting.

      Altman describes his shifting views as genuine good faith evolution of thinking. Do you believe he has a clear North Star behind all this that’s not centered on himself?

      • i7l2 hours ago
        (Other people's) money.
    • 2 hours ago
      undefined
    • 2 hours ago
      undefined
    • loloquwowndueo2 hours ago
      [flagged]
      • LoganDark2 hours ago
        Many browsers let you disable autoplay globally.
        • loloquwowndueo2 hours ago
          Sure, there are a couple of buttons I can press to stop the video. Why do I have to? Find me one person who likes auto playing videos. The page was created with a deliberate annoying choice that I have to go out of my way to override.
          • binarymaxan hour ago
            Why do you think the author of this piece, to who you originally replied, has any control over this?
            • 40 minutes ago
              undefined
          • LoganDark2 hours ago
            I'm not talking about pausing the video after it starts playing. I'm talking about a global setting to prevent videos from playing before you manually unpause them. Safari has such a setting, for instance.
  • pupppetan hour ago
    Ask Condé Nast if he can be trusted..

    https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/s/VWJVBNzc2u

  • HardwareLust24 minutes ago
    Of course he cannot be trusted. Anyone whose motivation is based on greed is by nature untrustworthy.
  • jesterson6 minutes ago
    Watch Altman's reaction in Tucker Carlson interview to the question about (alleged) murder of OpenAI researcher employee Suchir Balaji.

    The overall response and particularly the body language speaks a lot.

  • 2 hours ago
    undefined
  • just_oncean hour ago
    Amazing that this article and an actual comment from Ronan Farrow is this far down the list while...Scientists Figured Out How Eels Reproduce (2022) has 6 times the points.
  • drivingmenuts2 hours ago
    Short answer: No. Long answer: Hell, no.
  • gchokov2 hours ago
    He is cooked. Only a matter of time before the whole thing blows up. Once a scammer, always a scammer.
  • ahartmetz3 hours ago
    Well, no, obviously not. Not one bit.
  • therobots9272 hours ago
    Excellent work. I’ll have to wait until we get the print version delivered to finish as I’m not signed into the new Yorker on my phone.

    I’ve always been a huge fan of Ronan Farrow’s journalism and willingness to speak truth to power. I think he’s pulling at exactly the right thread here, and it’s very important to counteract Altman’s reputation laundering given that we run a very real risk of him weaseling his way into the taxpayer’s wallet under the current administration.

  • Aboutplants2 hours ago
    Seeing Sam Altman slowly degrade into the realization that he is in fact not as smart as others in this space has been fascinating to watch. He used to speak with enthusiasm and confidence and now he’s like a scared little boy who got in way too deep.

    The last person that this happened to was Sam Bankman Fried as investors and regular folk finally realized he was full of complete shit and could only talk the game for so long until the truth emerged.

    • therobots9272 hours ago
      Let’s just hope that scared little boy doesn’t run to Daddy Trump for a bailout.
  • LetsGetTechnicl2 hours ago
    No
  • josefritzisherean hour ago
    Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word "NO."
  • neya2 hours ago
    So, let me get this straight - the billionaire family (Newhouse) that owns and controls the narrative of one of the largest US media houses and co-owns assets along with Blackrock is asking whether Sam Altman can be trusted?

    The jokes write themselves

    • 2 hours ago
      undefined
  • covercash2 hours ago
    Why are all billionaires (especially tech) such villains?
    • aleph_minus_onean hour ago
      > Why are all billionaires (especially tech) such villains?

      Not all billionaires are villians. But it is long-known in organizational psychology that dark triad [1] traits are very "helpful" if one wants to climb career ladders fast.

      [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_triad

    • seba_dos12 hours ago
      I'm not 100% sure if it's strictly necessary to be a villain in order to become and remain a billionaire, but it seems like it could be and even if it's not it surely helps.
    • i7l2 hours ago
      I feel the "always have been" meme might be a suitable insert here.
    • burnt-resistoran hour ago
      Money often changes people's attitude in a fashion similar to chronic substance abuse. Plus, there's a insular and detached bubble effect that grows around them.

      Also, there's the psychopathic and narcissistic tendencies of greedier people and the false "virtue" "greed is good" that is contrary to the values espoused by Adam Smith.

      We need standard income tax brackets of 90% after $20M/y and 99% after $100M/y.

  • Cheyana3 hours ago
    Harvey Dent…
  • seba_dos12 hours ago
    Looks like Betteridge's law of headlines applies here too.
  • thm4 hours ago
    Hybris.
  • sumeno2 hours ago
    Betteridge strikes again
  • huflungdung2 hours ago
    [dead]
  • ekjhgkejhgk2 hours ago
    No.
  • catigula2 hours ago
    1. No.

    2. You cannot "control" superintelligent AI.

  • lnenad2 hours ago
    This whole situation goes to show that yesterday's conspiracy theorists are today's realists. What's happening to USA's leadership and as a country and what's happening with with their top companies is really scary for the rest of us. If this trend continues we're all definitely gonna end up in a kleptocracy.