11 pointsby volatilityfund8 hours ago4 comments
  • Ancalagon6 hours ago
    how is everyone reviewing ai-generated tools/ai-generated websites like these? I cannot keep up with all of these
    • bayarearefugee5 hours ago
      I just ignore it all, its just a bunch of useless cruft that nobody needs that people are throwing out there to seem AI-relevant.

      If you need to know "Should we migrate to GraphQL?" (the example on the site) and your brain is already AI-mushed to the point where you can't deduce this yourself, just ask the model directly, it doesn't need 9 layers of slop-built bullshit stacked on top to answer this question.

      • aid-ninja4 hours ago
        I broadly agree with you but if you use claude code you should give this a try, the website doesn't really do it justice but wheat really solves for a lot of pain points when using claude for longer sessions
    • insin5 hours ago
      I only stay on this particular variant of one of the 5 site designs every LLM spits out for long enough to check that - yes - it has the annoying thing where content fades in as you scroll, before closing the tab.
      • goodmythical5 hours ago
        They got that from humans who made websites.

        Ergo, the existence of the effect is not an effective filter for determining use of an LLM in the creation of the website.

      • aid-ninja4 hours ago
        if you like wheat, check out farmer & orchard (both are really cool)
    • throwaway2905 hours ago
      You don't have to review them just ask your llm to make the same thing if you really want it;)
      • aid-ninja4 hours ago
        I literally just tell claude, here is the deekwiki please use this tool for the next task lol
  • lmeyerov5 hours ago
    Evals or GTFO
    • 4 hours ago
      undefined
    • 4 hours ago
      undefined
  • weiyong10242 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • johnwhitman3 hours ago
    [dead]