32 pointsby grvbck5 hours ago7 comments
  • frogperson2 hours ago
    Everyday a new low. I shouldnt be surprised, but i cant believe someone could be so self serving and selfish.
  • 2020science4 hours ago
    It's an issue! As someone who's worked on science policy for decades, including time in the Beltway, you cannot develop a robust and world-leading science policy strategy with technologists alone!
    • ivell4 hours ago
      I would say still better than reality TV stars and ignorant podcasters.
      • lostlogin3 hours ago
        Musk not being there is a huge success.
        • throwawayqqq113 hours ago
          Which means no cure for my mind virus. I guess ill have to fall back to steak and raw milk then.
    • karmakaze4 hours ago
      ...and you can with a single technologist?
      • salawat3 hours ago
        Perhaps you don't understand peon. The technologist is there to take orders and execute. You thought you were being given input/a voice at the table? God, no. That's above your station. Now go on, shoo. Let the monied people talk. We'll call you when we need something done.
  • danbrooks3 hours ago
    This feels like regulatory capture by the tech industry. Academic research needs representation as well.
  • ticulatedspline2 hours ago
    Not that it matters much, pretty sure Trump is inadvisable.
  • brewcejener4 hours ago
    I bet we see some incredible vaccines released in the near future. We'll be sending patients to cure their cancer regularly on Mars.
  • bmitc4 hours ago
    Big f'ing surprise.
  • bediger40006 minutes ago
    We should insist on the proper name, "oligarchs", perhaps with the adjective "Trump crony".