2 pointsby cyclecycle7 hours ago2 comments
  • AlphaTheGoat7 hours ago
    I think the gap is less verification and more who owns the feedback loop. The valuable piece is capturing real outcomes and feeding that back reliably. Whoever closes the loop of data then action then measured result ends up sticky. Generation and verification become features around it, not the core.
    • cyclecycle5 hours ago
      yeah this makes sense. we run a citation verification service and provide publishers with data of hey this citation could be fake etc. but we don't currently capture any "action" or "measured result" so i guess that's what we need to expand to next
  • cyclecycle7 hours ago
    Trying to think about our best chance of making a lasting contribution (therefore actually surviving?) as a startup.

    I'm a big fan of focusing on verification tools ("Verification is all you need"?) but who knows.

    I'm sure I'm missing something in my perspective. Here to expand my aperture