17 pointsby raskrebs3 hours ago4 comments
  • klaushardt13 minutes ago
    Would be nice to have a flag to customize the URL displayed for Docker containers. I connect to my host via Tailscale, but I can’t open links with localhost. It would be helpful to have a parameter that allows us to choose a network device or specify an IP address to display.

        3000    wud (getwud/wud:latest)                            wud          getwud/wud:latest                       3000    http://localhost:3000
        3001    dockhand (fnsys/dockhand:latest)                   dockhand     fnsys/dockhand:latest                   3000    http://localhost:3001
  • raskrebs3 hours ago
    I always have a bunch of local projects running, particularly during the weekend where I'm rarely working on one thing at a time. A big pain of mine was constantly running into port: Redis from one project blocking another, orphaned dev servers from old worktrees, Docker containers I forgot about. The usual fix is lsof -iTCP | grep ..., then figuring out what the PID actually is, then killing it. But I always forget the command, and it doesn’t really include all the information that I like.

    So I built this lightweight CLI. Single binary, no dependencies. It shows everything listening on localhost with process names, Docker container info, clickable URLs etc.

    Sure there are workarounds, but none that satisfied my need for a short, easily rememberable command. Also nothing really has the same satisfaction as running sonar kill 3000 — it just feels nice. I’ve already been approached by a few agent orchestration tools that have been struggling with the same thing. It's really useful when you have multiple agents running, but it's not built for just that use case, I have also find it handy when killing off all containers after a failed cleanup and so on. Also know that MCPs are dead and CLIs are the new thing in agentic coding, this might be a useful tool for Claude, particularly when a compose process exits before all containers are stopped.

    Open for contributions, ideas and feedback.

    • embedding-shape12 minutes ago
      > I’ve already been approached by a few agent orchestration tools that have been struggling with the same thing

      Wow, this says more about the agent orchestration tool ecosystem than what you might think, that they're unable to kill child processes they themselves spawn makes it seem like they have zero clue about what they're doing.

      Probably why my impression always end up with "Wow, what a vibe-coded mess" when I look through the source of all these harnesses, they don't seem engineered at all.

    • pluc26 minutes ago
  • Bradd3rs2 hours ago
    love this, i get tired of spamming lsof -i tcp:xxxx
    • Doublon35 minutes ago
      The README made me realize I just needed a simple `alias local-tcp-listeners='lsof -iTCP -sTCP:LISTEN'` in my `~/.bash_aliases` :)
      • raskrebs5 minutes ago
        True, but as i write their are workarounds, the problem is that they are unintuitive, difficult to remember and don't provide all that much usability beyond listing. So these lack useful features like getting process stats, killing ports easily without having to remember the the pid after lsof and so on. I often have to kill multiple process at once after a failed cleanup. If you are into agentic coding, then having your agent create a profile for all the processes it stats, which it can easily kill of when finished is a lot easier for me atleast.

        Some features on the way are: next available port; wait (wait for a host to return a successful health check before proceeding - good for migrations etc.). And lots more. It's not just about listing running ports, but a tool for managing them.

        But to each their own, that's what's lovely about the many options available. But if you have anything in relation to this you think is neat, feel free to open an issue. It may be able to convince you that a simple alias won't suffice.

      • deadbabe26 minutes ago
        Same, not sure why a whole cli app is needed.
        • raskrebs3 minutes ago
          Developers are nitpicky, atleast i am and i know a lot of others that are as well. So don't underestimate the value of a nice tool with good developer experience, one that's intuitive, clean and easy to use means a lot when juggling so many things during a workday. So having a clean and light implementation to make job even easier is in my opinion worth it (and thus needed) :)
        • paddim820 minutes ago
          Because it gives more context. Quite obvious if you look at the readme...
    • raskrebsan hour ago
      Glad to hear! Have quite a few ideas in mind so keep an eye out for some updates (one of the ideas is an easy update command). There's a couple of open enhancement ideas as well. Feel free to add any or contribute.
  • Servant-of-Inos3 hours ago
    [dead]