19 States approved permanent daylight saving time(pix11.com)
17 pointsby geox5 hours ago6 comments
  • naberhausj4 hours ago
    Anybody know what those of us in the remaining states can do to help push this forward? I've never contacted my local representatives before, but this is the kind of no-brainer change that I would love for us to finally enact.
  • connorshinn3 hours ago
    Regardless of where you stand on this issue, I hope we can all at least agree that implementing half daylight savings time (ie a 30 minute adjustment) is just stupid.

    This idea was apparently introduced in a bill last month: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7378...

    • pianom4n3 hours ago
      Not really. The equilibrium of removing daylight savings will result in schedules somewhere between DST and Standard Time. This just gets you there faster.

      The trade off of having 30-minute time zone offsets probably isn't worth it, but this solution isn't immediately "stupid."

      • jauntywundrkind3 hours ago
        Actually the only intelligent solution is to abandon discrete time changes to & make this a continuous adjustment. We need to adjust the clock continually, ongoingly, to appropriately track the light of the day.

        /sssssss

        • peddling-brink2 hours ago
          Disregard clocks, touch grass, abandon technology, worship sun.

          Also, my retirement plan.

    • __s3 hours ago
      Finally, Newfoundland was right all along. First as per usual

      India also has half hour offset. & no DST

  • tengbretson4 hours ago
    Most devices don't even require manually setting the clock anymore. What exactly is so difficult about the time changing by an hour?
    • bigstrat20033 hours ago
      Most devices do still in fact require setting the clock. In my home right now, I have a computer, a phone, my microwave, my stove, and my car which all have clocks. Only the first two of those have the ability to sync time from an external source.
    • nobodyandproud3 hours ago
      I’m curious about your school or job/work schedules. Or how consequential it is, when personal scheduling isn’t kept.
      • tengbretson3 hours ago
        If a personal or family routine is not robust enough to handle an hour of variation I wouldn't expect the dst changeovers to register in the top 25 most disruptive yearly events.
  • aa_is_op5 hours ago
    Metric system when?
  • kelseyfrog4 hours ago
    You can just set your clocks to whatever you want. Stop trying to force people to do it with the government.
    • DangitBobby4 hours ago
      Ok but for most people work hours are dictated by a shared clock (and many daily activities as well) so... It becomes a coordination problem if we don't all agree on what time it is in each locale.
      • bigstrat20033 hours ago
        I appreciate the coordination problem here, but I do think that states are making it harder than it needs to be. The federal government doesn't need to be involved. Each state can decide on their own how to coordinate this, it does not need to be the entire nation (and indeed it already isn't, as the examples of AZ and HI show).

        Considering that one of the biggest problems in our country today is trying to run more and more at the federal level instead of at the state level, it's really silly to add to that pile.

        • acheron2 hours ago
          No, the law is that states can decide to not implement DST at all, but they can’t decide to have it permanently.

          At one point a couple New England states were looking at this, but for that reason it would have been implemented by moving to a different time zone: year round AST rather than year round EDT. (Which are both UTC-4.) That said, I think states need federal permission to move time zones, too.

        • gbear6052 hours ago
          The federal government constrains what states are allowed to do, so it has to be decided at the federal government. AZ and HI got legal exceptions long ago.
          • toast02 hours ago
            As I understand it, any state is welcome to keep standard time all year, as AZ and HI do, without dispensation from the federal government.

            Changing time zones or keeping permanent daylight time requires a dispensation. It is my firm belief that state legislatures have voted to keep permanent daylight time as a way to not actually change anything while telling constituents that they're doing stuff.

      • kelseyfrog2 hours ago
        Let the market decide. If it's worth it to some people, then they'll pay for the privilege of doing so.

        Right now, the revealed preference is that there is zero demand for it.

        • Kinrany2 hours ago
          Markets don't solve coordination problems
          • kelseyfrog2 hours ago
            What are you talking about? Markets solve the distribution and valuation coordination problem by price signaling. That's the whole shtick.
    • Kinrany2 hours ago
      Changes to official time zones should be a non-issue to you then
  • hyperhello3 hours ago
    If you look at a schedule of sunrise and sunset, there is no reasonable hour for school kids to walk in the daylight year-round. So your choice is to either let them walk in the dark in winter; not let them walk at all; change school hours seasonally; or change all hours seasonally.

    It’s not clear that daylight savings is the least reasonable solution. And there is no fundamental reason to me that the time has to be the same in two different states. Wanting to live with the hobgoblin of consistency does not make your plan correct.

    • tdeck37 minutes ago
      As a 90s kid, reading this caused me to wonder "How many kids actually walk to school anymore? I've almost never seen it in the US." Seems like it might be around 10%:

      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221133551...

    • bryanlarsen2 hours ago
      I don't understand what you're trying to say.

      The northernmost tip of the continental US gets about 8 hours of daylight during winter solstice. School is normally about 6.5 hours, so it's possible to give kids at least 45 minutes of daylight on either end of school any day of the year. Obviously not possible in Alaska, but possible in the other 49.

      If you insist on your time zones being an hour wide, that makes it 15/75 and 75/15 on the edges. 15 minutes isn't a lot of time to walk to/from school, but that's only the week of winter solstice which is often during Christmas break anyways. Every week away from solstice adds about 15 minutes.

      • hyperhello2 hours ago
        Okay, you do understand what I’m trying to say, so what am I supposed to respond? Tell me what your calculations for the school day year-round would best be in Washington State, and Maine.
        • bryanlarsen2 hours ago
          The existing standard times already work? For Seattle on PST that puts sunrise at 7:54AM and sunset at 4:20PM in Seattle during winter solstice. Which gives almost an hour of sunlight on either side for a standard school day of 9-3:30.

          For Bangor on it's 7:06AM and 4:03PM. It'd work better for an 8:30-3:00 school schedule. But for a 9-3:30 they'd unsurprisingly be better off on Atlantic Standard Time.

          • hyperhello2 hours ago
            Now convince the parents that the kids should go to school at 9 and convince the companies that parents should start work at 10. I’m not really the one you need to bat around.
            • bryanlarsen2 hours ago
              School start time is already 8:50AM in Seattle, no convincing needed.

              They start earlier in Bangor, but the sun rises earlier in Bangor, so again everything already lines up quite well.