What FounderScope does: Everything is connected. When you add an assumption to your BMC, it automatically appears in the Assumption Matrix ranked by criticality × uncertainty. When you run an experiment and mark it validated, the linked BMC item updates its status. When a revenue stream is defined in the canvas, it flows into the P&L model. Specifically, the platform includes:
Business Model Canvas with per-item validation status (assumption → testing → validated/invalidated) Assumption Matrix – auto-plots all assumptions on a criticality × uncertainty grid so you know what to test first Experiment Lab – Kanban-style experiment tracking linked to specific hypotheses Value Proposition Canvas with automatic fit scoring per customer segment Financial modeling – 12-month P&L, J-curve, Unit Economics (CAC, LTV, runway, burn multiple) Strategy Canvas + ERRC (Blue Ocean framework) Stage-Gate Roadmap with auto-validation against financial/experiment data Pivot Log with full version history
The core design principle: methodology-first. Every module maps to an established framework (Osterwalder's BMC, Lean Startup's Build-Measure-Learn loop, McKinsey Horizons, Stage-Gate). The goal isn't to reinvent strategic planning — it's to make these frameworks actually usable in one place without losing the connections between them. This started as a tool I wanted for myself. Curious to hear from anyone who's tried to run a structured validation process — what broke down for you? What did you resort to?