2 pointsby nonstopnonsense4 hours ago1 comment
  • thebuilderjr3 hours ago
    Interesting project. The hard problem feels like surviving API drift after the first happy-path recording. One thing I'd strongly consider is storing a small request contract per generated tool: which params are real user inputs vs session noise, which headers/cookies are auth, and which response fields are invariants. Then webbridge_update could ignore harmless churn (extra analytics params, reordered JSON, renamed endpoints) and surface real semantic breaks. Do you also have a strategy for avoiding overfitting to one user's logged-in state/permissions?
    • nonstopnonsensea minute ago
      So ... There are two options while recording. By default, only the absolute necessary traffic is captured for effective playback by any LLM. The other option is to capture all - that would be for sleuth - privacy and security abusive investigation.

      The API drift is something I need to think about. They are bound to change over time - webbridge_update was made for that for now.

      I am not entirely understanding "over fitting", can you please explain more?