24 pointsby bundie8 hours ago13 comments
  • sunaookami7 hours ago
    Why don't they start with low-hanging fruit like the buggy and slow history and bookmarks view instead of yet another redesign of the main browser interface? Are the designers bored? And stop making everything excessively round. And it kinda looks like Opera, another adware AI browser.
    • dangus6 hours ago
      Because if their browser doesn’t look like the other ones on the market, customers assume Firefox is behind the times and not as good.

      Like it or not, Apple and Google set trends in terms of look and feel.

      • wpm3 hours ago
        Do customers actually think that though?
        • UqWBcuFx6NV4r3 hours ago
          We do not need to re-litigate the legitimacy of fashion whenever HNers take offence at the implication that they too are human.

          This stuff is has all been proven, time and time again.

          • GuestFAUniverse2 hours ago
            Software is also _a tool_.

            I do not redesign my (physical) toolbox multiple times per decade. On the contrary: I use my grandfather's drill, because it lasts longer and gets the job done more reliably then the "redesigned" crap that is most of the current market.

            Do I still use FVWM2? Hell no... Could I work the same like 30 years ago, if all the fashion wouldn't have happened: absolutely.

            The major improvements weren't cosmetics.

          • wpm2 hours ago
            Re-litigating assertions is sometimes incredibly useful.

            Firefox isn't in the spot it's in because it doesn't copy Material Poo/Liquid Ass enough, or because it doesn't look like Chrome enough, or that in a somewhat crowded market just doing your best to blend in with the rest is a good strategy for growth or popularity. Refusing to follow fashions that make your browser harder to use or uglier might not be a terrible idea. Mind you, I'm not trying to claim that it absolutely is a great idea, or that Mozilla should copy the Winamp skin and go backwards, but goddamn, have some guts.

            But I guess it's an axiom, that if you don't copy how everyone else looks, you're doomed.

  • gkhartman44 minutes ago
    I really thought we'd be using a Firefox powered by Servo by now, but instead we're getting a second UI rewrite. At least it's not becoming a chromium wrapper.
  • TomMasz7 hours ago
    Change for the sake of change.
  • amenhotep3 hours ago
    Oh no, not again.
  • ichik7 hours ago
    Ladybird, Servo and Orion can't come soon enough.
  • jokoon2 hours ago
    Somebody finally picked up the login autofill bug, not sure it's production ready
  • jajuuka2 hours ago
    Whoever thought it was a good idea to have a full size address area AND a full size vertical bar at the same time needs to find their way to the door. On desktops and large laptops it's not a major problem, but smaller displays it's wasting so much space.

    This design feels very generic though. Doesn't really stand out from any other modern browser.

    • bundiean hour ago
      maybe that's the point?
  • hulitu4 hours ago
    Funny, I thought of "they added more things on the window title. They did. Why not add also the URL bar there ?
  • 6 hours ago
    undefined
  • pranshuchittora8 hours ago
    Arc Browser
  • fortyseven4 hours ago
    So tired of UI refreshes of things that already work fine.
  • thatguy274 hours ago
    I hate it.