82 pointsby LostMyLogin4 hours ago18 comments
  • iso-logi2 hours ago
    I switched from OpenAI to Anthropic over the weekend due to the OpenAI fiasco.

    I haven't been using the service long enough to comment on the quality of the responses/code generation, although the outages are really quite impactful.

    I feel like half of my attempted times using Claude have been met with an Error or Outage, meanwhile the usage limits seem quite intense on Claude Code. I asked Claude to make a website to search a database. It took about 6 minutes for Claude to make it, meanwhile it used 60% of my 4h quota window. I wasn't able to re-find it past asking it to make some basic font changes until I became limited. Under 30 minutes and my entire 4 hour window was used up.

    Meanwhile with ChatGPT Codex, a multi-hour coding session would still have 20%+ available at the end of the 4/5 hour window.

    • digitaltreesan hour ago
      I have been using anthropic almost exclusively for a year, while trying other models, and this has literally never happened. I have NEVER experienced a downtime event. At most a random error in a chat but that is immediately solved on the subsequent request. I use the desktop app, the mobile app, the api with several apps in production that I monitor and reliability has never been an issue.

      I pay about $1500 per month on personal api use fyi.

      • m4tthumphrey2 minutes ago
        How are you spending that much?
      • tmountain28 minutes ago
        I’ve had semi regular downtime since I stayed using Claude about two months ago. I love it but I find it less reliable than alternatives. This is evidenced on their status page (regularly showing red bars).
      • w4yai6 minutes ago
        > $1500 per month on personal api use

        Dude... whose going to tell him ?

    • tvink2 hours ago
      You're not wrong, for sufficient simple cases it's at a disadvantage. But once things get complicated, it wins by being the only thing that you can get to work without going insane.

      And yeah, any serious use completely assumes a Max sub.

  • upmind3 hours ago
    Jarred (from Bun) said that a lot of the errors are being of how much they've scaled in users recently (i.e., the flock that came from OpenAI)
    • andreagrandi2 minutes ago
      I must have missed something: why are people moving from OpenAI? Since they released gpt-5.3-codex I'be been using it and claude with opus-4.6 and Codex has always been better, more accurate, less prone to allucinations. I can do more with a 20$ OpenAI pland than with a Claude Max 100
    • fred_is_fred3 hours ago
      The first scaling event was after their highly successful Super Bowl ad and the second was being on the right side of history over the weekend.
      • dilyevsky2 hours ago
        this has been an issue for years at this point... other labs are hardly any better tho
  • anonnona88782 hours ago
    keeps going down. One more time and I'm moving to Codex. Or hell, I better go back to using my actual brain and coding, god forbid. Fml.
    • lambdaan hour ago
      Please relearn to use your brain.

      I cannot imagine how you can properly supervise an LLM agent if you can't effectively do the work yourself, maybe slightly slower. If the agent is going a significant amount faster than you could do it, you're probably not actually supervising it, and all kinds of weird crap could sneak in.

      Like, I can see how it can be a bit quicker for generating some boilerplate, or iterating on some uninteresting API weirdness that's tedious to do by hand. But if you're fundamentally going so much faster with the agent than by hand, you're not properly supervising it.

      So yeah, just go back to coding by hand. You should be doing tha probably ~20% of the time anyhow just to keep in practice.

    • tvink2 hours ago
      You'll be back :)
  • davegardneran hour ago
    I hope they improve their incident response comms in the future. 2.5 hours with nothing more than "We are continuing to investigate this issue" is pretty poor form. Their past history of incident handling looks just as bad.
  • adithyassekharan hour ago
    Are employees from Anthropic botting this post now? This should be one of the top most voted posts in this website but it's nowhere on the first 3 pages.

    Also remember, using claude to code might make the company you're working for richer. But you are forgetting your skills (seen it first hand), and you're not learning anything new. Professionally you are downgrading. Your next interview won't be testing your AI skills.

    • AlexeyBelovan hour ago
      > Your next interview won't be testing your AI skills

      Not that I disagree with your overall point, but have you interviewed recently? 90% of companies I interacted with required (!) AI skills, and me telling them how exactly I "leverage" it to increase my productivity.

      • adithyassekharan hour ago
        Are they just looking for AI skills? If so that's terrifying.
        • tmountain30 minutes ago
          Probably, I think hand coding is going the way of the dodo and the ox cart.
  • thekid3142 hours ago
    Yeah, the influx of people is disrupting my work, but it brings me joy to witness OpenAI’s decline in consumer support. So much for their Jonny Ive product, whatever it was.
    • camillomiller2 hours ago
      I am so baffled that someone with the stature of Jony Ive fell prey to scam Altman empty promises. I would have expected much more of him.
      • chihuahua2 hours ago
        Altman put all of his attribute points on lying.
  • rosquillas2 hours ago
    I'm basing my next projects on the ability of Claude code to write code for me. This disruptions are scary.
  • kshacker3 hours ago
    I was having an extended incognito chat with claude.ai, and then it stopped responding. I saved the transcript in a notepad and checked in another tab whether it was down. i wonder if the incognito session is gone, and whether by reposting it i can resurrect it. I have done so with Gemini but there it has codes like "Gemini said", which I do not see here. If anyone knows that, appreciate a solution.
  • adham-omranan hour ago
    The service has been inconsistent and/or down for the last 12 hours..
  • himata41132 hours ago
    Seems to be the biggest outage yet. Might be related to power loss events in UAE timing is suspicious as more datacenters appear to be hit.
    • kshacker2 hours ago
      If you look at their status page, something has been bubbling for the past week

      https://status.claude.com

      • himata41132 hours ago
        Never noticed it being outright down like this except for today (and yesterday), never had actual downtime except for few failed requests that worked after a retry which coincides with AWS datacenters going offline.
    • lelanthran2 hours ago
      > Might be related to power loss events in UAE timing is suspicious as more datacenters appear to be hit.

      More datacenters? I thought it was just one.

      • himata41132 hours ago
        The strikes are actually still ongoing afaik.
    • kube-system2 hours ago
      A not particularly large AWS region on the other side of the world? Doubt it.
      • himata411335 minutes ago
        well there has been pretty large deals going on in UAE especially when it comes to AI since they can get any power capacity with a flick of their fingers for an unbeatable price and the latency in AI doesn't really matter since the first token is usually seconds anyway. And it's not just AWS it's the entire region.
  • digitaltreesan hour ago
    Anyone else find this timing odd given the DoD ban?
  • siliconc0w2 hours ago
    They need to keep an emergency backup Claude to fix the production Claude when it goes down.

    (More seriously I wonder if they'd consider using Openai or Gemini for this purpose)

    • bashtoni2 hours ago
      Opus and Sonnet are still working fine in AWS Bedrock (and probably Google Vertex), so they genuinely do have an emergency backup Claude they can use.
      • codegladiator2 hours ago
        Isnt bedrock and vertex pass thru to anthropic servers ? I didnt know aws/google are deploying the actual models
        • etothet2 hours ago
          AWS actually hosts the models. Security & isolation is part of the proposed value proposition for people and organizations that need to care about that sort of stuff.

          It also allows for consolidated billing, more control over usage, being able to switch between providers and models easily, and more.

          I typically don’t use Bedrock, but when I have it’s been fine. You can even use Claude Code with a Bedrock API key if you prefer

          https://docs.aws.amazon.com/bedrock/latest/userguide/what-is...

          https://code.claude.com/docs/en/amazon-bedrock

          (I am not affiliated with AWS in any way. I’m just a user stuck in their ecosystem!)

          • LostMyLoginan hour ago
            I’ve been using Claude Code w/ bedrock for the last few weeks and it’s been pretty seamless. Only real friction is authenticating with AWS prior to a session.
        • kube-systeman hour ago
          Bedrock runs all their stuff in house and doesn’t send any data elsewhere or train on it which is great for organizations who already have data governance sign off with AWS.
    • killingtime742 hours ago
      Maybe they can use the ultimate backup...human programmers!
  • AYBABTME38 minutes ago
    This right now today is making the case for OSS AI and local inference. 200$/m to get rate limited makes a RTX 6000 Pro look cheap.
    • tmountain27 minutes ago
      How well do local OSS models stack up to Claude?
      • sunaookami15 minutes ago
        They don't, only on meaningless benchmarks.
  • tayo422 hours ago
    Who fixes the Ai when the Ai is down? Semi serious since they're pretty big on not writing code?
    • kube-system2 hours ago
      The same guy who used to fix stack overflow, presumably
    • brookst2 hours ago
      Most ops fixes don’t involve writing code though.
  • cbracketdash2 hours ago
    Already made the switch back to Codex :-)
  • PinkMilkshakean hour ago
    I won't hate you for downvoting me, but this is heroin-grade schadenfreude.
  • rvz4 hours ago
    “98.92 % uptime” is horrendous and unacceptable.

    Only one 9 of availability means you are seriously unreliable.

    • fred_is_fred3 hours ago
      There are 2 9s in 98.92.
      • cronelius3 hours ago
        well actually since 1 == 0.999999… and 98.82 is 98.91999999… there are an infinite number of 9s
      • cr125rider2 hours ago
        “Wait you mean sequential 9s!? Here I was waiting for just the right time to turn it back on…”
        • brookst2 hours ago
          I’m very proud of our 0.999999% uptime. Six nines!
      • digitaltreesan hour ago
        underrated...
      • Tadpole91812 hours ago
        Oh come on guys, this one is at least funny.
  • kelvinjps102 hours ago
    But code is solved?
    • digitaltreesan hour ago
      Why do you assume this is a code issue? They were literally banned by DoD and then suddenly go down? There is at least a question to ask there, no?