3 pointsby zinekeller4 hours ago5 comments
  • guerython3 hours ago
    The AI-native buzzword sounds scary because you read it as "AI eats your packets," but the engineering plan is a lot more down-to-earth. They want to feed the schedulers sanitized telemetry (per-slice latency, packet loss, active UE count) into trained controllers instead of hand-tuned heuristics so the slice can rebalance in milliseconds.

    The critical safeguard is to separate that telemetry plane from any user payload and run it through a zero-trust gateway before the ML model sees it. We built the same trick into a 5G edge orchestrator last year and the model only ever touched aggregated KPIs, never user content, which kept compliance teams happy while still letting the scheduler react faster than timers ever could.

    • quantifiedan hour ago
      What is you confidence that the safeguard would be applied?
  • chrisjj3 hours ago
    > build the world’s next generation of wireless networks on AI-native, open, secure and trustworthy platforms.

    "AI" and trustworthy in the same sentence.

    They must think we're stupid.

  • quantified3 hours ago
    If the AI consumes all communications on the network, it seems like a bad idea.
  • ares6233 hours ago
    what the fuck does that even mean
  • antibull3 hours ago
    [dead]