RTS is an experimental protocol exploring execution provenance for AI-assisted decisions.
Instead of focusing on outputs, it records structural execution state:
- Context - Assumptions - Constraints - Decisions - Outcomes
The goal is reconstructability.
If a decision cannot be reconstructed, it cannot be defended.
I’m especially interested in critique around: - whether execution provenance is actually necessary - overlap with existing logging / observability tools - failure modes I may be missing
Serious feedback welcome.