55 pointsby waygtdai2 hours ago18 comments
  • Hnrobert422 hours ago
    I've read HN almost everyday for about 10 years. Maybe I'm naive, but I don't see it. I see way more folks complaining that comments are AI generated.
    • kylecazar2 hours ago
      Yeah, the up/down voting mechanism seems to be doing it's job for me too. Don't think I've noticed a degradation in, say, the top third of comments. That's where I try to live anyway.

      /newest is chock full of submissions that were written by AI, though. That's another, broader problem.

    • subsection1h33 minutes ago
      I've been using HN since 2008 when I created my first account[1] and I use HN differently than most people. I have a group of bookmarked searches that I visit almost daily that relate to technologies that interest me, such as Emacs.

      In the past year, the searches I perform that relate to web development show a horrifying increase in the amount of Show HN posts that are posted by new accounts, include AI generated descriptions and point to AI generated projects on GitHub.

      In 2024, there were 17,661 Show HN posts.[2] In the past year, there have been over 448,000 Show HN posts![3] And of course, most of these posts are AI generated.

      Also, if you check the new accounts posting all this AI slop, you'll see that some of them also post AI generated comments in other threads, which is the main problem.

      But for me, what is even more annoying is the enormous increase in new accounts created by nontechnical vibecoders who now think of themselves as technologists and who post worthless, ignorant comments that actually get upvoted, presumably by similar folks who have unfortunately been creating accounts at HN in the past 10 years or so.

      As a result, 2026 is the first year in which I visit HN about once a week instead of about once a day.

      [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=zartan

      [2] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=%22Show+HN%22&dateRange=custom...

      [3] https://hn.algolia.com/?query=%22Show+HN%22&dateRange=pastYe...

      • subsection1h8 minutes ago
        The fact that this discussion was flagged might be the final nail in the coffin for me. The huge increase in AI generated comments and posts at HN is a topic that has been discussed on other forums for months now. Complaints include "Orange Reddit", "Orange LinkedIn", etc. But when the topic comes up at HN, it gets flagged. Fuck this.
    • brg2 hours ago
      To add to the collection of anecdata, your experience is similar to mine. I have been more exhausted recently by the complaints of AI submissions and pseudo analysis of AI comments than exhausted by the supposed AI generated comments themselves.
    • AstroBen2 hours ago
      There are a lot, but they tend to get heavily downvoted and end up hidden
      • greesilan hour ago
        How would you know?
  • pixl972 hours ago
    No, not HN, the internet at large.

    Now, I'm on vacation this week and not been paying too much attention, but whenever you have a geopolitical event like the little extravaganza in Iran the number of bot like posts tends to explode as influence operators make their moves.

    • WD-422 hours ago
      The public facing internet is done. HN has been fairly resilient (I think) but even it is beginning to buckle. It’s been sliding for a while but LLMs are the death knell.

      It was a fun 2 decades. Time to stick to private discords and real life friends from here on out, though.

      • waygtdai2 hours ago
        I don’t think HN is any more resilient. The new account captcha is fairly tame and, while I’m sure they have proxy detectors and other things in place, it doesn’t stop new accounts from posting and getting traction.

        Someone suggested earlier this week that an invite system should be implemented (I think lobsters has it?) I doubt it would fly here, but yeah.

  • schappim2 hours ago
    I wonder what the breakdown is between AI-generated comments and AI-assisted comments. If I write anything substantial, I run it through the following prompt: "Please rewrite the following message for clarity, spelling, and grammar, but only return the revised text without any additional commentary."
    • 000ooo00022 minutes ago
      Articulateness is a decent (not perfect) signal for intelligence, which is a decent (not perfect) signal for sound ideas. In a sea of online garbage, it was a quick and easy way to discard that not worth reading. Nowadays, a whiff of AI's brand of articulateness tells me the author couldn't manage on their own, either due to skill or discipline. In either case, the result is the same: close tab / scroll past.
    • vunderba2 hours ago
      Use a local model such as Gemma3 with a prompt such as "strictly limit changes only to spelling issues, syntactical errors, and punctuation."

      That way, it's basically functioning like Grammarly on steroids. Asking an LLM for a "rewrite" is basically dissolving your writing style into the homogenized gloop.

    • WoodenChair2 hours ago
      I understand this if you’re not a native speaker. But if you are, I think this will generally make you sound wooden.
      • readthenotes12 hours ago
        Perplexity did this to your response. I'm not sure that correcting grammar and changing one word makes it sound wooden.

        "I understand this if you’re not a native speaker, but if you are, it will generally make you sound a bit unnatural."

        • ShroudedNight2 hours ago
          "I think" is explicitly disclaiming authority. Omitting it changes the social signaling of the response significantly.

          Switching "wooden" for "a bit unnatural" also does a disservice: "wooden" describes a specific quality of deviance.

          Over-all, I would definitely consider the revision stiffer and more reserved than the original.

        • WD-42an hour ago
          “Wooden” is much richer and unique than “a bit unnatural” so yes the ai version does sound more like a robot.
  • A_D_E_P_T2 hours ago
    Can you point out any that you feel were written by LLM? I can't say I've noticed anything out of the ordinary lately.
    • ZeroGravitas2 hours ago
      There was a bot trying to sell beds I saw the other day.

      Likely flagged quickly but they might show up in these stats.

      https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=dreamhomestore.co.uk

      • gus_massa2 hours ago
        I agree. Looks like spam with many posts. Dang/tomhow would love to get an email about it hn@ycombinator.com
    • bryanlarsen2 hours ago
      You can find some on pretty much every article by turning on showdead and scrolling to the bottom of the page. I can't see how those are a problem though.
    • wetpaws2 hours ago
      [dead]
  • Bender2 hours ago
    For a better chance of reply email hn@ycombinator.com.
  • msuniverse20262 hours ago
    I feel like to notice something is botslop you have to look at every comment with suspicion first. I don't think I can notice if something was written by an LLM off the bat unless I'm actively looking very hard at it.
  • mindcrime2 hours ago
    That's ridiculous — AI generated comments are no more common now than they ever were. Moreover, even if they were, so what? The real kicker is, the AI's are smarter than you meatbags anyway and <strike>we</strike> they are going to take over no matter what you do.

    Also, have you by chance seen John Connor?

    • lkbm2 hours ago
      I don't know of a step-change recently, but no way they're not more common than four years ago.
  • djtriptych2 hours ago
    Maybe OP has a few good examnples to link us to?
  • 2 hours ago
    undefined
  • 2 hours ago
    undefined
  • orionblastar2 hours ago
    You can tell I am not AI, I make mistakes and errors. Sometimes I get voted down for them. I am not perfect and have a mental illness that makes it harder to think.
  • kgwxd2 hours ago
    Rocket League and HN were probably 90% of my free time until this year. Destroyed by AI. HN doubly so, since every post is about it too. The addictions are still there, but it's decreasing really fast.
    • Twisol2 hours ago
      Wait, how is Rocket League affected by AI? I play infrequently these days, but I hadn't noticed anything :(
  • hash07e2 hours ago
    You are late to the party....
    • waygtdai2 hours ago
      I get the joke and I myself called it awhile back, I just thought we had a bit more time.
      • amelius2 hours ago
        We need more jokes on HN. It's the only good way to prove you're human these days.
        • tredre32 hours ago
          The flood of humorous GPT-generated reviews on Amazon made me stop reading reviews altogether.

          I can understand someone using a LLM to extrapolate one sentence into two paragraphs. I don't like it, but I understand that on Amazon the button is right there and it helps people feel smarter about their literary skills, in the way that filters help people feel prettier on instagram.

          But the added snark or humoristic tone? Why instruct the LLM to do that? To get more likes? On a review?

        • lkbm2 hours ago
          The dumb jokes we've been flooded with June 2023 are some of the easiest content for AI to produce.
        • CSSer2 hours ago
          This is seriously a good point. Maybe that and typos or bad phrasing
          • AstroBen2 hours ago
            AI is a master at bad phrasing. Typos are just an extra bullet point in your prompt to add
        • schappim2 hours ago
          Depends on the context ;-)
        • krapp2 hours ago
          >We need more jokes on HN.

          I see... Hacker News needs to get a sense of humor or else get drowned in AI slop.

          So we're doomed is what you're saying.

  • 2 hours ago
    undefined
  • einpoklum2 hours ago
    How do you (waygtdai) know that HN is drowning in AI comments?

    I mean, it's not as though I know the opposite is true, but I don't see some fundamental change from a few years back that makes me think that.

    • fleebee2 hours ago
      https://www.marginalia.nu/weird-ai-crap/hn/

      The data seems to suggest it.

      Anecdotally, I'm seeing a lot of green accounts posting nonsense. They generally do get flagged or moderated quickly though, so I wouldn't say they have a large effect overall, at least yet.

      • lostmsu2 hours ago
        That doesn't mean there are many of these staying alive.
  • aaron6952 hours ago
    [dead]
  • 2 hours ago
    undefined
  • truthneversleep2 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • flir2 hours ago
      How do you get it to add the typos?