Definitely lots of parallels with Conductor, here's where I think we differentiate specifically.
* The interface to interact with your AI is a full IDE (our minimal fork of vscode) with a focus on the CLI AI
* Further, each workspace gets their own IDE with all the functionality that implies
* We support a bunch of different CLI AI
* Since it's a vscode fork, you have access to the open source extension marketplace so you can even use the extension AI's like Roo Code in parallel (or your favorite CLI AI's extension like the Claude Code extension which you can see in our video!)
* I believe our take on running your app in parallel is a bit different (I may be wrong though!). We provide a means to name variables that will bind to ports so your parallel runs of your app don't fight over ports
* Github PR review right in DevSwarm, leave comments and approvals! We are definitely in the same space for sure, our aim with DevSwarm 2.0 was to make the transition to multi-task/parallel development less of a sheer cliff.
For many folks diving into AI First development multi-tasking with worktrees was really intuitive, but taking a step back it's a pretty huge ask to make that pivot. DevSwarm 2.0 we think really helps bridge that gap.
Plus full PR-mode support within. Full Jira integration.