1 pointby yubainu7 hours ago1 comment
  • yubainu7 hours ago
    I’ve been exploring why LLMs "break" during inference. Most current hallucination detection methods look at the final text (semantic analysis) or use another LLM to double-check (self-consistency). These are effective but extremely slow and expensive.

    SIB-ENGINE is my attempt to solve this at the geometric layer. By monitoring the "Anchor Drift" (how hidden states deviate from the prompt’s latent trajectory), I found that hallucinations often manifest as a structural instability before the token is even sampled.

    The Numbers:

    Recall: 53.89% (It catches about half, but it's consistent)

    Precision: 88.52% (Low false-alarm rate is my priority)

    Overhead: <1% (Running on an RTX 3050 with 4GB VRAM)

    AUC: 0.8995

    I've released a Lite version (1-axis) on GitHub so you can see the fundamental logic and run it on your own machine. I’ve also included the raw_logs.csv from my N=1000 test run on Gemma-2B for full transparency.

    I’m particularly curious if anyone here has experimented with similar geometric approaches or has thoughts on how this might scale to 70B+ models where the latent space is significantly denser.

    Happy to dive into the technical details!