2 pointsby geox4 hours ago2 comments
  • bikenaga2 hours ago
    Original article: "National analysis of cancer mortality and proximity to nuclear power plants in the United States" - https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-026-69285-4

    "Abstract. Understanding the potential health implications of living near nuclear power plants is important given the renewed interest in nuclear energy as a low-carbon power source. Here we show that U.S. counties located closer to operational nuclear power plants have higher cancer mortality rates than those farther away. Using nationwide mortality data from 2000-2018, we assess long-term spatial patterns of cancer mortality in relation to proximity to nuclear facilities while accounting for socioeconomic, demographic, behavioral, environmental, and healthcare factors. Cancer mortality is higher across multiple age groups in both males and females, with the strongest associations among older adults, males aged 65–74 and females aged 55–64. While our findings cannot establish causality, they highlight the need for further research into potential exposure pathways, latency effects, and cancer-specific risks, emphasizing the importance of addressing these potentially substantial but overlooked risks to public health."

    The PhysOrg article (https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-02-proximity-nuclear-pow...) noted that they controlled for educational attainment, median household income, racial composition, average temperature and relative humidity, smoking prevalence, BMI, and proximity to the nearest hospital.

  • anovikov4 hours ago
    It must be something different from radiation. There literally no way in the world a normally operating NPP could be a radiation hazard.