11 pointsby donsupreme6 hours ago3 comments
  • armchairhacker5 hours ago
    Would you also accept a city providing benefits to only white residents?

    You could provide benefits on a criteria like poverty, which is intrinsically race-blind and agreeable but happens to include a higher ratio of black people. Like you could provide a scholarship based on test scores, which is intrinsically race-blind but happens to include more Asians. But this is objectively racist, and I believe unlikely to benefit even black people in the long run due to the underlying message.

  • 4 hours ago
    undefined
  • zug_zug5 hours ago
    This is the type of thing that sends certain people emotionally of the rails, but I suppose I can't say a city shouldn't do whatever they think is right just because some bad-faith actors will try to use it as a rallying-cry.
    • 0xy5 hours ago
      California never had slavery. Reparations for what?
      • kelseyfrog5 hours ago
        To be purposely pedantic, it did. It was however mainly the Spanish mission system[1] who enslaved indigenous people.

        1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_slavery_in_Californ...

      • Gibbon13 hours ago
        Before red lining San Francisco's zoning laws restricted what neighborhoods black people (and Asians and Hispanics) were allowed to live.
      • zug_zug4 hours ago
        I never said the word reparations… just that it’s a topic that makes a certain group really emotional