35 pointsby PaulHoule4 hours ago5 comments
  • nicoburns3 hours ago
    The list of "recommended reading" from one of the issues looks great:

    https://github.com/a-e-k/canvas_ity/issues/11#issuecomment-2...

  • msephtonan hour ago
    The project is great. The HN comments are embarrassing. Isn’t it ironic to imply laziness by chiming in with “vibe coded” which in itself is such a lazy reaction.
  • ddtayloran hour ago
    Thank you for sharing. The only thing I don't understand why this is a header only implementation with a macro that goes in a C++ file.

        #define CANVAS_ITY_IMPLEMENTATION
  • Lerc2 hours ago
    It would be interesting to compile to WASM to compare side by side for performance and accuracy.
  • ranger_danger3 hours ago
    vibe-coded?
    • nicoburns3 hours ago
      Most likely not seeing as the commit containing the bulk of the implementation dropped in 2022.
      • ranger_danger3 hours ago
        maybe just the README then
        • flowerbreeze2 hours ago
          The README is older than ChatGPT too. It's very unlikely that it's vibe coded or vibe written.
    • peter-m802 hours ago
      Would that be an issue?
      • Amlal2 hours ago
        Yes, it's a canvas library, there's a lot of risks of including AI generated code that hasn't been checked in a rasterizing library.
        • ivanjermakovan hour ago
          A lot of risks compared to what? I imagine bugs in kernel drivers or disk utilities be riskier.
        • JoeyJoJoJr26 minutes ago
          Such as?
      • 1bpp2 hours ago
        Yes.