2 pointsby michaloo2 hours ago1 comment
  • maxxmini2 hours ago
    Nice work! The Cloudflare Containers DX gap is real - setting up Wrangler + Durable Objects + Container bindings just to run a Docker image is way too much ceremony. Having a simple `deploy` command that handles all that plumbing is exactly what the ecosystem needs.

    Question: how does cold start compare to Fly.io? Since these are Firecracker VMs under the hood, I'd expect similar performance, but curious if the Cloudflare routing layer adds overhead.

    • michaloo42 minutes ago
      Thanks! Based on my impressions CF Containers are slower to boot but have lower latency later. I moved some test apps from DigitalOcean App and I saw 10-20% improvements in loading time (which is different what you asked since DigitalOcean is probably more k8s than firecracker, but just to share my experience).