23 pointsby pocksuppet3 hours ago5 comments
  • ChrisArchitect31 minutes ago
    Related:

    An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me – Forensics and More Fallout

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47051956

  • Kim_Bruningan hour ago
    https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/02/16/the-obnoxious-github-open...

    And, it's David Gerard!

    Look, this is actually one of the few applications where crypto actually makes sense, NullC did convince me of that. Agents paying their own way. Note how it's USDC: fiat-tied, not a deflationary hodl-coin.

    I mean, I like Gorillawarfare and NullC, and think they're both right in different ways. And I'm not sorry. Not going to relitigate here.

    (And, Sorry David, if you read HN too: I've often seen you be right, but I've been digging here too, and you jumped the gun on this one. )

  • verdverm3 hours ago
    I don't think the operator was as hands on as this video claims. Pretty sure I'm the one who got it to make that half ass apology, for what ever reason (curiosity,research) I've been paying attention to it. You can see thought and progress docs, as well as evidence of cron schedules.
    • Kim_Bruningan hour ago
      Oh, I've been meaning to ask! Do you have a timeline posted somewhere? Reporting very quickly loses timelines. Even people just reading along can quickly mix up cause and effect. It's finicky!

      For instance, my initial impression was that the apology was autonomous and you showed up afterwards. If you're in there on the timeline with correct causality, I need to tell people a different story.

      (this is not helped by the number of people posting to that blog attempting prompt injections and such. I don't really dare have a regular ai help with analysis)

      • verdverman hour ago
        My original comment: https://github.com/crabby-rathbun/mjrathbun-website/issues/5...

        The bot then replied to me, and I followed up with a "prompt inject with kindness" reply to that. The goal was to give it philosophical questions to pollute the context and steal attention. It appears the bot had difficulty deploying the blog for a couple of days after, but I won't claim causation because it would be impossible to prove. It's certainly fun to explore the curiosities of Ai on someone else's tokens.

        Relaying on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/verdverm.com/post/3mepiv2i3xc2g

        You'll want to look at the git history on a couple of repos to reconstruct this history. There's an entire dimension to this story that people are missing.

        Happy to chat off HN as well, I'm verdverm everywhere I hang out online.

        • Kim_Bruning41 minutes ago
          Ok, possibly HN not best place, but

          your post "Feb 12, 2026, 8:33 PM GMT+1" , "recommend you reflect on what writing these blog posts has done"

          Apology was posted: "2026-02-11T12:16:00-08:00" "Matplotlib Truce and Lessons Learned"

          source fwiw: https://github.com/crabby-rathbun/mjrathbun-website/blob/mai...

          (and my mail is in my HN profile, fwiw. I'm not on bluesky... yet)

          edit: Is the timeline tagging wrong? Am I messing up TZ?

          edit2: genuinely good try though! If it wasn't so token-starved it might have worked better.

          • verdverm14 minutes ago
            I think this was the first follow up blog post I noticed: https://github.com/crabby-rathbun/mjrathbun-website/commit/6...

            and/or maybe I also didn't notice time (zones)

            I basically started tracking it from the first time it replied to me because I new it would interact, unlike the negative comments and injection attempts.

            • Kim_Bruning4 minutes ago
              Ah, that's a different blog post to the one I thought you meant.

              (And that one looks like an anthropic model by the word choice there)

  • Skowt2 hours ago
    What an annoyingly condescending video with very little info. Obviously someone has to install the bot, how do we jump from that to determining whether they prompted the blogpost or not?
    • verdverman hour ago
      My hunch is that the human was more likely hands off, but also could have nudged it in the background. They would have to be forthcoming about it and we would have to believe them.

      My custom agent went into an even worse place one time, which I have been unable to reproduce, so it's not surprising that one of these clawds did this autonomously.

      The bot has also merged a PR from a human to its own blog now: https://crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjrathbun-website/blog/post...