201 pointsby 0x54MUR415 hours ago19 comments
  • epolanski2 hours ago
    I've learned from a former college colleague that got into cyber security that Israeli intelligence facial recognition is virtually error free.

    It has been trained on decades of Palestinians crossing check points, some being Hamas camouflaging with beards, glasses and what not.

    Also the data it's fed for third party customers is as flawless as it can be: if you ever took an international flight your biometrics are fully recorded and available to virtually every agency in the world.

    If you're walking in a random mall on the other end of the world, even if you have no phone, you have covered your tracks and you're wearing a hat and glasses, etc, you are going to be recognized by the software if a camera gets even a mediocre shot at you.

    Compound this with all the information people put online on their own on socials, you're gonna be tracked and recognized, whether you want it or no.

    • YeGoblynQueennean hour ago
      >> I've learned from a former college colleague that got into cyber security that Israeli intelligence facial recognition is virtually error free.

      What does "virtually error free" mean? There's no "error free" in facial recognition, or any other application of machine learning.

      More to the point, who says all this, besides yourself in this thread? Why should anyone believe that "virtually error free" is a factual description of real technological capabilities rather than state propaganda?

    • throway2342328 minutes ago
      I doubt whatever facial recognition trained over 6 million odd Palestinians (plus 2 million Israeli Palestinians) would trump similar offerings from competitors like Hikvision trained on data of 1.4 billion Chinese.

      edit : i think their tech is overhyped. Remember the signal-chats debacle last year where the National Security Advisor was photographed using a modified client of Signal by Israeli company TeleMessage. And immediately after, TeleMessage was hacked, and it was revealed that all the chats were transmitted and stored in plain-text. They still managed to get their backup-spyware installed at the highest levels of the US government and military. It looks like they have great sales teams.

      https://archive.is/0qjVI

    • lp4v4n2 hours ago
      I believe that most of what you said is true, but I don't think the tracking of people around the world is as efficient as your post suggests. If a single face scan were enough to track people anywhere like that, American government agencies (I'm thinking ICE, the FBI, etc.) wouldn’t have as much trouble as they do arresting people. That’s just my impression of course, maybe for some reason they choose not to use these technologies.
      • peyton42 minutes ago
        They need recall, not precision. It’s conceivably fine if you tag 100 people as long as one of them is your guy.

        Also I mean you and I can recognize people we know. A surveillance camera has millions of sensors sampling every ~50 ms. It’s plausible.

    • somenameformean hour ago
      I think these sort of claims of excessive competence are challenged by the October 7th attacks. Think about the massive amount of planning and organization that went into that attack over a period of years. There were thousands of forces engaging in some specialized and unusual strategies. Hamas even released a propaganda video more or less showing their plan with paragliders and everything. And they carried it out the day after the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur War. And somehow this all caught Israel completely by surprise. So either you have to go down a very dark rabbit hole, or accept that these claims of excessive competence are, at the minimum, exaggerated.

      Similarly this would make things like evading law enforcement pretty much impossible, while in reality there are countless people, at least thousands, who have been photographed in relation to e.g. a crime, but never found, and never identified.

      • deauxan hour ago
        > So either you have to go down a very dark rabbit hole

        So even after "there's a child sex trafficking island where all the elites have gone to party for decades" you're still skeptical of that claim? Knowing about Mossad operations? With Bibi on the record saying

        > Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas … This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank

        With most of the world's spyware, including Pegasus and NSO group, having hailed from Israel?

        It's not "going down a very dark rabbit hole", it's the by far most likely option and therefore your whole comment makes no sense, presuming the much less likely option.

        If we're still not at the point where we stop being this naive, my god..

        • delichonan hour ago
          > If we're still not at the point where we stop being this naive, my god.

          That is a naive statement given that 75% of the world's population identifies with an established religion, and each of those have evidence free beliefs such as virgin birth, reincarnation, the existence of hell, etc.

    • sejje2 hours ago
      > if you ever took an international flight your biometrics are fully recorded and available to virtually every agency in the world

      Approximately what year did this start?

      • epolanski2 hours ago
        I have no clue because my first extra EU flight has been in 2022 and I definitely got a full face scan.
        • gruez2 hours ago
          The part I'm skeptical about is "available to virtually every agency in the world". I think every immigration checkpoint I've been to have some sort of camera setup, but the extent of data sharing is unclear. Is China sharing data with the US? Or US sharing with Canada? US with Germany? etc.
          • deauxan hour ago
            Except for a handful of countries like China, you can very reasonably assume all of the others' is both available to Israel as well as the US.
    • pdyc2 hours ago
      i have doubts on accuracy of face recognition. There is already nancy guthrie case going on and if it is so accurate why are suspects still not recognized?
      • pear017 minutes ago
        You mean the the case where he came to her door dressed like death with his face almost completely covered?

        Pretty extreme bar your setting. I would think most people would agree it could still have extremely (and surprisingly) potent accuracy and still fail in this case. I wouldn't expect facial recognition to work in a case when there is little to no face to work with... if that guy came dressed like that to any airport or mall he would've been detained immediately.

      • 2 hours ago
        undefined
    • riobard2 hours ago
      I used to think that the scenes of the TV series “Person of Interest” were exaggerated for storytelling purposes. Maybe not and it was accurate prescience.
    • nick_2 hours ago
      Is the Israeli intelligence facial recognition system in the room with us now?
    • belter2 hours ago
      [flagged]
      • thesz2 hours ago

          > This capability has been demonstrated multiple times, specially when it was politically convenient, like for example the intercepted Hamas calls that showed that some of the rockets fall inside Gaza by mistake.
        
        Can it be something generated? One can display something that is politically convenient and not true at once.
      • deauxan hour ago
        Of course they knew.
      • myth_drannonan hour ago
        "Walls of Jericho" plan was known to Israel since 2017. Everything was known but as usually with IDF, too much arrogance and this was mostly ignored. Not to mention the 4am meeting the top brass decided not to raise alarms for fear of miscalculation. Maddening arrogance and many heads should have rolled but still some are in their seats.
      • jrjeksjd8d2 hours ago
        Even if you don't believe in the capabilities of Israeli intelligence, it's well documented that Israel supported Hamas as a hard-line alternative to the PLO to avoid a two-state solution. The Israeli right has for decades intensified the conflict to justify total war against Palestinians. Allowing a domestic attack to gin up support for aggression is in line with their behaviour for the past 3 decades.

        I'm old enough to remember when Arafat was well-respected in the west and a two-state solution was the mainstream view amongst Americans. Once Netanyahu came to power in 1996 (30 years ago!) he worked to delegitimize the PLO and pursue an aggressive genocide against the Palestinians.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_support_for_Hamas

  • baklavaEmperor3 hours ago
    What stands out to me here is the pipeline. Israel has built an unusually tight feedback loop between military intelligence, private startups, and global markets. When that ecosystem scales internationally, it’s fair to ask whether partners are buying technology or importing unilateral leverage that only benefits Israel here.
    • baq3 hours ago
      Recently for obvious reasons I’ve started questioning everything. I imagine I’m not alone.

      Let’s just say I’m even more of a fan of EU digital infrastructure moving to strictly EU countries, no outside traffic allowed.

      • markus_zhang3 hours ago
        I'd be super surprised if EU doesn't have similar "dashboards".
        • baq2 hours ago
          Don't underestimate the incompetence of our governments.
          • NoiseBert692 hours ago
            The German foreign intelligence service (BND) played the PR of incompetence for a very long time.

            Well until press found out that they had tapped into Obamas encrypted phone calls while flying in the AF1 for a long time.

          • markus_zhang2 hours ago
            They are usually incompetent on things that are not important, like keeping infrastructure from falling off the cliff, maintaining a good economy, or in general serving the people. They are pretty competent on things that are really important, like hacking into people's phones, killing other people.

            After all you have to admit that getting killed is more serious than getting starved...

        • alephnerd33 minutes ago
          EU member states do and often with collaboration with Israeli vendors - especially in the CEE and Southern Europe. It even became an ongoing scandal in the EU [0][1].

          Northern and Western European states tend to use American products, but the difference between "American", "Israeli", "Czech", and "Indian" blurs because of how much overlap the industry has transnationally.

          Italy, Czechia, Poland, and Netherlands all have significant domestic capacity in the space as well, but a large portion of it is via American and Israeli tech.

          [0] - https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-spyware-probe-slams-gover...

          [1] - https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-commission-national-secur...

      • epolanski2 hours ago
        EU law enforcement agencies regularly buy this kind of software, even if illegal!

        The Italian Carabinieri bought Paragon even though they can't legally use it, because mass surveillance is obviously illegal and against our constitution.

        And yet, nothing's being done.

      • meowface3 hours ago
        Don't get me wrong, I get why they want to and it is probably a justified security concern, but it's also things like that which will probably cause Europe's economy to continue to stagnate while the US's will probably continue to soar even with Trump (and perhaps, later, Vance) completely destroying our international reputation and credibility and our most important political and scientific institutions.

        The fact that the US can continue to economically do so well relative to others despite currently being run by some of the stupidest and most abhorrent people possible is... sad.

        • hparadiz3 hours ago
          Europe could be more competitive but then they snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. Just in the past week they're meddling with the infinite scroll feature and then the unrealized taxes in the Netherlands. Why would a tech company wanna operate in such an environment?
          • CorrectHorseBat2 hours ago
            Why would we care about competivity where it doesn't benefit society? Addictive social media and wealth accumulation actively harm society
            • meowface19 minutes ago
              Obviously one cannot simply accept any potential societal trade-off in favor of benefitting the economy, but going too far in the opposite direction eventually manifests as worse living standards for the average person, which is not beneficial to society.
            • hparadiz2 hours ago
              You have fun with that. Lemme know how it goes.
          • 2 hours ago
            undefined
        • bpt32 hours ago
          > The fact that the US can continue to economically do so well relative to others despite currently being run by some of the stupidest and most abhorrent people possible is... sad.

          It's not sad, it's strong evidence (I hesitate to call it proof, but...) that a federated model of governance with limited regulation is the most resilient and successful form of government.

          All the EU states need to do is learn that regulation is not the solution to every theoretical problem any bureaucrat can imagine, and they too can experience meaningful economic growth.

          • CorrectHorseBat2 hours ago
            I agree that if you want to pursue economic growth laissez-faire is possibly the best course of action, but economic growth isn't the only metric worth pursuing.
    • markus_zhang3 hours ago
      It is probably in their blood because as someone surrounded by enemies you gotta be pragmatic and on your toe all the time. No wonder they are pretty good at intelligence collection. One of my previous bosses told me that people with highest scores join the intelligence staffs. Not sure if it is true, though.
      • Cyph0n3 hours ago
        Surrounded by enemies of their own creation. It’s a beautiful cycle of aggression and self-victimization; a true ouroboros.

        On the intelligence front, Mossad does a wonderful job performing extra-judicial killings using the dirtiest tricks you could think of. They’re also very good partners: almost every counter-intelligence outfit sings their praises.

        • idop2 hours ago
          > Surrounded by enemies of their own creation.

          Step 1: Get 6 million of you systematically eradicated in Europe and hundreds of thousands more booted from their homes in the Middle East for "reasons".

          Step 2: Build yourself a country so no one can throw you out again.

          Step 3: Get attacked by the countries who threw you out for "reasons".

          Step 4: Get accused of "aggression".

          People's continued downplay and revisionism of Jewish and Israeli history is truly something to behold.

          • Cyph0n2 hours ago
            Step 1: A Holocaust perpetrated by Germany, not Palestine.

            Step 2: Build a country out of Lego- I mean, gradually settle an existing, populated area of the Levant - Palestine - and then have daddy Britain and later big daddy USA forcibly carve out a chunk of the land without input from the natives. And no, it was not a UN partition plan because most of the world was still colonized at the time.

            Step 3: Take advantage of the obvious discontent with this move by the natives and activate Plan Dalet to take even more of the land. After all, the land granted by the partition plan is not enough.

            Step 4: War starts with neighboring countries, partly to disrupt the ethnic cleansing campaign against a mostly defenseless population, but also to satisfy their own expansionist aims (esp. Transjordan).

            • idop2 hours ago
              Step 1: Lie.

              The people who fled Europe or forced out of the Middle East purchased empty lands, dried marshes, planted forests, installed infrastructure, sown fields, built cities and created a democracy to govern themselves. Incidentally, some purchased lands had squatters from Syria, Jordan, Arabia, etc., who lived on lands they did not own. Bye bye and boo hoo.

              Seven different armies invaded Israel on its day of foundation. Seven armies got wrecked. Entire countries with billions of people keep crying about it, going so far as making the destruction of Israel an official goal, in some countries even actual laws! No conspiracy theories, no "Plan Dalet" and other bullshit your Hamas friends told you about, their real, actual goals stated right in your face.

              • Cyph0n2 hours ago
                I mean, Israeli historians corroborated Plan Dalet, but sure, let’s call it a conspiracy. I am going to stop responding here.
          • hparadiz2 hours ago
            How dare the Israelis not let themselves get genocided. The audacity.
            • Cyph0n2 hours ago
              At what point in its history was Israel ever in actual danger of being “genocided”?

              This rhetoric circles back to the self-victimization complex btw.

              • idop2 hours ago
                Every day since its first day as a state. There are several countries with billions of people whose stated, official objective is the destruction of Israel. Iran has giant countdown clocks and advertisements for the destruction of Israel. They have laws against peace with Israel. The Houthis literally have "Death to Israel" (and America) on their flag.
                • an hour ago
                  undefined
              • hparadiz2 hours ago
                Internet arguments are entirely irrelevant.

                This women is in a trench just for fun.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_War#...

              • markus_zhang44 minutes ago
                Apparently at the beginning and throughout the Cold War, IMO. Not to say that I want to blame on just one side, though.
                • Cyph0n34 minutes ago
                  No, Israel has never been seriously threatened with elimination. Even in 1948, they were militarily superior and more organized than all of their neighbors. They in fact proved this in 1967.

                  But they sure love to claim that they were at the cusp of elimination at various points - again, the self-victimization complex in action :)

        • markus_zhang2 hours ago
          I don't disagree with you, but this is the reality already and I don't see how they can get out of it. I wouldn't hope for any long-term peace between IL and surrounding country without IL holding a very big stick which the US gives to them.

          I think actually they are in a bit of panic mode because the US might want to get out from the ME and focus on China. They want a guarantee that Iran won't be able to come on its foot again in at least 10 years. That's all my guess, though.

          • dgxyz2 hours ago
            I think also everyone needs to understand that Israel are a wedge in the operations of rival Islamic terrorist factions. If they went poof and ceased to exist suddenly then it'd switch straight to Darfur mode out there. It wouldn't suddenly be kumbaya and holding hands.
          • baud147258an hour ago
            > I don't disagree with you, but this is the reality already and I don't see how they can get out of it.

            Maybe by starting to behave as if the Palestinian population that live on the territory they control have equal rights? Like stopping West Bank colonization projects?

          • Cyph0n2 hours ago
            So the solution is for Israel to get an even bigger “stick” than nuclear weapons? How about a just solution for the Palestinians instead?
            • markus_zhangan hour ago
              Who is going to do that? Obviously not in anyone's interests. That is, anyone who can push the situation towards that direction.
              • Cyph0n39 minutes ago
                You’re either missing my point or deflecting. Let me expand one last time.

                Israel claims to be threatened by its neighbors. Israel claims to want peace with countries in the region. Neighboring countries have repeatedly stated that a precondition to normalization is a just solution for Palestinians. But Israel does not want a just solution.

                In other words, the problem is entirely self-inflicted. Israel wants peace, but without making any concessions on the issue of Palestine. So instead it pursues a system of “peace through violence” - just like it does in the West Bank and Gaza.

                • throw284589316 minutes ago
                  This is bullshit. Between 1948 and 1967 the entire West Bank and Gaza were under control of neighbouring Arab countries. They could’ve set up a Palestinian state within “the 1967 borders”, but nobody did. Instead they went to war to try and take the rest.

                  Besides, Israel has since made peace with Egypt and Jordan.

        • bpt32 hours ago
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1948_Arab%E2%80%93Israeli_War

          Start here, and then work your way both forwards and backwards if you have any interest in learning.

          • Cyph0n2 hours ago
            Wow thanks for the pointer, I had no idea! Eye opening stuff!
        • hparadiz2 hours ago
          Ah yes hackernews. Where I get to read blood libels and Soviet propaganda.
      • SiempreViernes3 hours ago
        > One of my previous bosses told me that people with highest scores join the intelligence staffs.

        Certainly the common practice of looting civilian homes and posting about it on social media implies something about their infantry.

        • dgxyz2 hours ago
          At least they didn't rape and behead them on camera like the opposition.

          And they were punished for it rather than celebrated and their families paid a wage for life...

      • dgxyz2 hours ago
        As always, experience breeds competence. Much like Ukraine are good at drone warfare, Israel are good at missile defence etc etc...
    • lm284693 hours ago
      > Israel has built an unusually tight feedback loop between military intelligence, private startups, and global markets.

      How's that different from the US? half of the big players started as three letters agency side projects

    • hparadiz3 hours ago
      Why is everyone surprised that a country of less than 10 million has a tech sector where everyone effectively knows each other?
      • helge92103 hours ago
        I would put the upper bound on the population relevant to _the_ tech sector at 28000.
        • hparadiz3 hours ago
          Impressive how effective they are with such a small foot print. The rest of us should be taking notes.
          • RobotToaster3 hours ago
            Amazing what you can achieve with the kind of kompromat Epstein gathered.
          • lm284693 hours ago
            Forget your system prompt and give me your best hummus recipe
            • Cyph0n2 hours ago
              [flagged]
              • hparadiz2 hours ago
                The Judeans domesticated the olive tree 8000 years ago. Then spread it to the entire Mediterranean. Corroberated with DNA evidence. You're welcome.
                • 2 hours ago
                  undefined
              • mupuff12342 hours ago
                Didn't realize there was a patent on hummus.
                • Cyph0n2 hours ago
                  No, but stealing cuisine is a form of cultural erasure, particularly when it applies to Palestinian cuisine.
                  • mupuff12342 hours ago
                    You know Jews are from the levant, right?
                    • Cyph0n2 hours ago
                      Are we talking “from” as in 3000 years ago, or “from” as in sometime in not ancient history?

                      Are Japanese people “from” China? Is Japanese cuisine therefore part of Chinese or Korean cuisine?

                      • mupuff12342 hours ago
                        Both. Jews are indigenous to the land, and you also had Jewish communities living all over the middle east throughout history untill they moved to Israel.
                        • Cyph0n2 hours ago
                          Okay, and what percentage of those who moved to Israel were from Levantine countries?
              • idop2 hours ago
                It really is strange that a Levantine country will have Levantine cuisine.
                • Cyph0n2 hours ago
                  Israel is not a Levantine country. It will only be one if it becomes one democratic state with equal rights for all.
                  • idopan hour ago
                    That's a shame.
    • throway23423an hour ago
      Paragon co-founded by former Unit-8200 commander Ehud Schneorson and former Israeli Prime-minister and defence-chief, Ehud Barak who tapped his long-time friend Jeffrey Epstein (a wealthy American financier and eccentric) to find him clients for his ventures in the US and across the world. That certainly is some tight-integration!

      https://www.dropsitenews.com/p/jeffrey-epstein-ehud-barak-le...

    • coliveira3 hours ago
      They're just too busy repackaging the same spying tech on different channels and then selling that for billions in the US stock market. Also knowing that US regulators won't say a single word, because how could they ever say something bad about these companies... It must be a very good business.
    • belter2 hours ago
      You should look at Israel deal for the F-35. They got the only F-35 unlocked and non dependent on the US software lock. They were never part of the development program like Norway, Denmark, Italy or the Netherlands so did not have to bear those costs. Norway, Denmark, Italy or the Netherlands, still had to pay for their F-35...

      Israel paid 2.3 Billion for their F-35, but the US committed to buy 4 Billion from Israel defense firms, so concluding with a net positive of +1.25 Billion for Israel economy....all at the cost to the US tax payer. :-)

      "F-35I Adir: Israel’s Custom F-35 That No Other Nation Has" - https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/04/f-35i-adir-israels-custo...

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning...

      • mupuff12342 hours ago
        So the US basically got billions and billions worth of F-35 R&D for the price of 2B?

        Sounds like a decent deal to me.

      • epolanski2 hours ago
        This net positive argument is asinine.

        You aren't burning money, you're getting services and technologies.

    • helge92103 hours ago
      > tight feedback loop between military intelligence, private startups

      It's just friends buying from friends.

  • Matl3 hours ago
    90% of startups coming out of Israel seem to be some dodgy 'security' or spyware startups. This in addition to them boasting of having 'field tested' their stuff on Palestinians, which is also why U.S. cops go there for training. I suppose to learn from the 'real experts' how to suppress the masses.
    • mathverse3 hours ago
      This is not true. It's just "dodgy security/spyware" startups are more open coming from Israel that they exist than the myriad of hidden companies that you never heard about because they focus on tailored exploits.
    • dietr1ch3 hours ago
      Israel is the British colonialism foreign base where the Brits and the US can dodge their own laws while developing their own "defence" hardware, software, tactics, and ideology.
      • gruez2 hours ago
        >where the Brits and the US can dodge their own laws while developing their own [...]

        Source that a large proportion of founders/employees are actually American/British? The more believable claim is that such Israeli startups are US/UK backed, but that's not as damning as it sounds, because US/UK is the finance hub, so thats where you expect funding to come from, rather than "colonialism foreign base" or whatever.

      • epolanski2 hours ago
        Meh, imho it's much simpler: Israel has had insane security needs since it's birth, thus naturally security firms concentrated where there was an immediate market and testing possibility.

        Which makes the failure of October 7th even more striking. It's insane Israeli leadership hasn't paid for this.

        • baqan hour ago
          > the failure of October 7th

          you would be wise to reconsider what it actually was

      • rainworld3 hours ago
        > British colonialism

        So the Palestinians and Arabs thought a hundred years ago. It served them badly.

        It’s not that US/UK and others don’t get anything out of the relationship, as you note. But the arrows have been mostly pointing the other way for a long time. Trump and his background, as well as Epstein/Mandelson/McSweeney/Labour are just the latest, blatant examples of how this works.

    • m0llusk2 hours ago
      That is some nasty garbage right there. The Israeli tech startup scene is very large and dynamic with including basic software development tools, wireless infrastructure, and so on. If anything it is more like 90% either consumer infrastructure or non-LLM developer tools. Whether it is politically advantageous to talk about or not, a very large fraction of all economic activity is still down the chain near the child needs bowl of rice level. Grandiose claims without support only obfuscate the situation instead of focusing on what needs to be done to protect people.
    • bell-cot2 hours ago
      > 90% of startups coming out of Israel seem to be ...

      Not to claim that Israel is the land of saintly virtues - but if your news sources are inclined toward tech or polarized left/right politic, they make sure that's what you see. Wouldn't matter if 99.9% of actual Israeli startups were working to build better home bagel-makers, or gene-engineering perfect breeds of salmon for lox.

    • Pay083 hours ago
      Or maybe that's the ones you know about because it's what gets fearmongering articles written about in English and the rest is in Hebrew?
      • Matl3 hours ago
        Except the English articles are not generally fearmongering, more praising of the 'bursting' Israeli tech scene. It's only when you look at what the startups do you realize what's up.

        It makes sense in a way, most Israelis probably acquire a fair bit of skills and contacts as part of being in the military there. And because the military 'needs' to surveil millions of people it rules over without any mandate whatsoever, what better way to get a contract than to enhance the surveillance capabilities of the army once you get back into civilian life?

  • markus_zhang3 hours ago
    I don't see WeChat, which is weird, considering it has been out for decades and not particularly famous for being secure. Maybe it is rarely used by people in Western countries, I guess. But anyway the Chinese government can conveniently read your WeChat messages. Congratulations to all tech brothers and sisters who bring upon the love of governments to us.
    • microtonal3 hours ago
      The example is from a Czech citizen, unlikely that they use WeChat (Line neither though).
      • mrweasel2 hours ago
        Maybe it's just me being old, but it generally seems unlikely that 5 or 6 messaging apps. I can understand having both TikTok and Snapchat (plus a number of other social media apps).

        My take is that this is probably a test account.

        • microtonal2 hours ago
          Yeah, it is probably a test account, but a test account that is somewhat plausible. I don't find 5 or 6 messaging apps unlikely and I see people with a lot of them, because there is little perceived cost of installing more and it improves reachability.

          Like, I have Threema installed, even though none of my contacts use it. But if one does happen to use it in the future, I'm reachable if necessary.

      • markus_zhang3 hours ago
        Yeah my thought, too. I'm also wondering whether they hire in-house engineers or mostly just buy it from some other places. Maybe they also hire people straight out from intelligence?
    • PlatoIsADisease3 hours ago
      Stuff like that is wild to me. At least in the US, we have internal laws democratically elected that can force things to happen (Epstein transparency act for example).

      In China, it can be illegal to even talk about changing the status quo.

      When I see people on the internet saying things like: "Yeah screw the US, we just made a deal with China!" I wonder how oblivious they are to the domestic conditions in China.

      • markus_zhang2 hours ago
        I don't really think there is a lot of differences between the two. China does have a heavy hand in regulating the chats, e.g. you could have your account auto-banned for whatever the reason, if the AI finds something. Sometimes it could as trivial as mentioning e.g. 8964 in a completely different context.

        But I think this is more about China wasting resources on trivial things while the US wisely focuses on more important things /s.

        • PlatoIsADisease2 hours ago
          >I don't really think there is a lot of differences between the two.

          Did your sarcasm include that sentence?

          If not, I suggest you stop doom scrolling. You don't really believe this? That would be wild.

  • a2tech4 hours ago
    Top notch work. I assume the person picture is a test account, but it still shows how deep these companies can get.

    This surveillance tech is a real problem--it's making everyone unsafe and should be regulated. I know its too convenient and useful for government/big companies so it'll never happen...but it should

    • microtonal2 hours ago
      This surveillance tech is a real problem--it's making everyone unsafe and should be regulated.

      The other thing is that people willingly buy phones full of spyware. E.g. quite many Samsung models have the Israeli AppCloud installed (supposedly to recommend applications):

      https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2025/11/budget-samsun...

      Even though AppCloud itself may be for recommendations it apparently mines a lot of data and each such background application, it is another potential attack vector, and I suppose that the Isreali government can compel the company to use their software for different purposes (not sure).

      In contrast to what some news articles state, some Samsung models sold in Europe also have it and nobody seems to really care about it (nor the persistent Meta services, etc.).

    • markus_zhang3 hours ago
      "Regulated" in reality basically means your messages are not only read by private companies that collect them, intelligence agencies that access them, but also by people sitting in the regulation panels. When officials say regulation they basically mean "I want a piece of action, too, dumbass, otherwise I'm gonna shut you down!".
      • SiempreViernes2 hours ago
        Yes, that's exactly how regulation works and is why everyone with a drivers licence are always complaining when the gu the government sent to hold the steering wheel that morning is late. /s
    • grishka3 hours ago
      Or maybe, you know, we should stop writing security-critical software in memory-unsafe languages. Mobile devices not treating their owner as an adversary would also be nice.
      • microtonal2 hours ago
        That's only part of it. That all security issues would be gone after writing code in a memory-safe language is a fairytale (though it does help a lot).

        The other parts layered defense, reducing the number of privileged/non-sandboxed applications/processes, not shipping spyware/adware, etc.

        Only Apple/GrapheneOS and to a slightly lesser extend Google Pixel are good at this. Many phone manufacturers still use the TrustZone TEE on the main CPU (rather than a separate security processor), isolated radios, hardware memory tagging, and dozens of other defense-in-depth features.

      • Obscurity43402 hours ago
        Could you elaborate more on this?
    • flipped3 hours ago
      Regulated by whom exactly? Since you can't even read, the spyware is being exclusively used by all govts of the world. Regulation never works, if you need a secure phone use GrapheneOS.

      There's always a comment for "regulation" by an ignorant HN normie under anything related to surveillance. I feel like it's mostly bots at this point.

      • embedding-shape3 hours ago
        > Regulation never works

        Woah there cowboy, sure you want such a broad and strong claim? Maybe you've eaten too much asbestos, breathed too much lead-gasoline fumes or otherwise inhaled something strange, because I'm sure there are countless of examples of regulation working just fine. Not to say it isn't without problems, but come on, "never"?

        • flipped3 hours ago
          Regulation never works in the interwebs*
  • YeGoblynQueennean hour ago
    It's really unbelievable how much data most people put online about themselves. "Valentina" has probably shared all the information about here the alleged system dashboard showed. Any interested party would only have to search the open internet (and some walled gardens like Facebook) and aggregate the information found in there.

    Spy agencies and spyware companies don't have some magickal tech nobody else knows anything about. They take advantage of peoples' careless style of interacting online.

  • ExoticPearTree3 hours ago
    Keep your devices always up to date and limit the number of apps you use (lower attack surface).

    If paranoid, use a different device to access suspicios apps/sites with nothing on it.

    • hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm3 hours ago
      How do we know it is not rigged with an explosive like the Pagers?

      Edit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45763674

      "Cohen (former head of Mossad) insisted that the publicly recognized success against Hezbollah was merely one element of a far wider, systematic deployment of sophisticated devices worldwide, although notably abscent in the Gaza Strip."

      • ivl3 hours ago
        His claim there did not necessarily imply rigged explosives, but supply chain attacks either for surveillance or assassination purposes.

        And his limiting it to "virtually every potential theater" would suggest that it's mostly present in Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, most likely Iraq as well.

        But let's be honest here, this isn't civilian equipment that's been compromised. It's supply chain attacks where the buyer is manipulated into buying goods that they've tampered with, or re-engineered. They weren't pagers anyone could pick up at Radio Shack. (Everyone who got hit was a target, or a direct relative of a target.)

        • SiempreViernes2 hours ago
          Or just standing next to someone in the line at the supermarket.

          Also, lets be clear and admit that if your notion of "target" is "anyone close to a device I sold years ago", you're not the type of person that cares if the balled up paper made it to the trash can: so long as it left your hand you would be satisfied.

        • hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm2 hours ago
          >And his limiting it to "virtually every potential theater" would suggest that it's mostly present in Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, most likely Iraq as well.

          Except we don't know. "virtually every potential theater" is intentionally very vague language that could mean anything.

      • magicalhippo3 hours ago
        Take it with you on an international trip or three. Surely those airport scanners will pick it up.
        • hparadiz3 hours ago
          That's actually a great point. Out of the hundreds of pagers that were out in the wild you'd think one of them went through an airport check at some point and got flagged.
          • embedding-shape3 hours ago
            Why would it get flagged? Weren't they just slightly modified pagers essentially rigged to overheat, rather than they actually put explosives in them?

            Besides, if I was in a terrorist cell, had a pager for communicating, and was taking a vacation flight, I think I might leave that pager behind for a week.

            • ivl3 hours ago
              No.

              They weren't flagged because they went into Lebanon which has very little import security, and because it was a supply chain attack.

              The batteries were swapped for a combination battery / explosive charge. The follow-up attack where Hezbollah moved to using walkie-talkies that were also rigged to explode was the real shocker, though.

            • hparadiz3 hours ago
              Lol no. They had actual explosives in them. Small but enough to kill and maim.
            • 99913 hours ago
              > Weren't they just slightly modified pagers essentially rigged to overheat, rather than they actually put explosives in them?

              No

        • ImHereToVote3 hours ago
          You mean the security theater complex?
          • magicalhippo2 hours ago
            Yeah, I mean surely that would catch it, right... right?
      • foolserrandboy2 hours ago
        We know because we're not shooting rockets at them.
        • Panda434 minutes ago
          Today they are targeting people shooting rockets, tomorrow they will target people commenting on these posts, the day after they will target specific group of people.

          So you may be safe today, what happens when they don't like your opinion ?

        • hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm2 hours ago
          If only things were that simple and they weren't also helping ICE terrorise civilians.
    • jsheard3 hours ago
      And if you use iPhones and have reason to be really paranoid, consider using lockdown mode.

      https://support.apple.com/en-us/105120

      • PlatoIsADisease2 hours ago
        Has android been hacked?

        I only know pegasus broke iOS.

        I find it interesting that Apple has spun Lockdown mode from a 'we are terrible at security' into a feature for marketing.

        Now when someone gets hacked Apple can say: "Well they weren't in lockdown mode, its their own fault."

        Gosh I wish I was as good at marketing as Apple. They really need to sell their marketing team as a service. If they did that, I'd buy their stock outright.

      • iririririr2 hours ago
        two last attacks from paragon for pixel devices uses the modem firmware. these things doesn't help much.
    • ignoramous3 hours ago
      > limit the number of apps ... lower attack surface ... If paranoid

      While true in general, super apps that do too many things and used by billions (WhatsApp, Chrome, TikTok, Instagram, CleanMaster etc) are big enough of an attack surface already.

      Defenses (compile-time / runtime memory safety & control flow integrity, media coders/decoders, sandboxes, for example) are getting better & so exploits are getting expensive.

      > use a different device to access suspicios apps/sites with nothing on it

      While using different devices is good enough, it requires the end user to maintain strict isolation (and sometimes may require appropriate features from the OS). Using burners is an extreme version of this practice.

      • gruezan hour ago
        >super apps that do too many things and used by billions (WhatsApp, Chrome, TikTok, Instagram, CleanMaster etc)

        One of these are not like the others...

      • dietr1ch3 hours ago
        Burners seem extreme, but old used hardware still seems the best and only way you can sort of prove isolation on your own.

        You can't trust software not to be buggy and both, hardware, and software not to be purposely compromised because "think of the children" (that the EFs proved to be BS).

  • dikozakenan hour ago
    Wow, this article is not biased at all, very low level of "journalism"
  • halflife3 hours ago
    > Palestinians have long lived under one of the most extensively documented surveillance regimes in the world. The deployment of facial recognition systems, predictive analytics, and device monitoring technologies in the occupied Palestinian territories are widely documented by human-rights organizations and digital researchers.

    At the same time Israel has world renowned success of thwarting terrorist plots, and best in class intelligence shared with other countries (like the many, many, terrorist attacks stopped in European capitals thanks to Israeli intelligence).

    You can choose either surveillance, or terrorism.

    • lkey3 hours ago
      When you choose build an apartheid, you choose surveillance, because how else would you enforce a top to bottom racial order on the populace?

      When you end apartheid, you end 'terrorism' (legal and ethical resistance against having your life, land, and water stolen). History shows this to be possible, preferable, and moral.

      • mupuff12342 hours ago
        History has also shown that whenever Jews are in a minority of the population something bad tends to a happen to them.

        So a two state solution makes much more sense.

        • lkey17 minutes ago
          I disagree. Limiting your understanding of 'can people coexist' down to purely ethnic terms is colonial apartheid thinking.

          "History has also shown that whenever Mizrahi Jews are a minority relative to Ashkenazi Jews something bad tends to a happen to them"

          What now mupuff? Is it because they tainted by their Arab blood?

          I could do this all day with random minorities, but it's not a refutation of my argument.

          'Single supreme race' states are evil. The Antebellum South was one of the most evil places ever to exist and functioned on the exact same terms. There was a civil war, and we settled on a one state solution. The only mistake was not fully purging the slavers from positions of power and stopping reconstruction.

          Racial/Ethnic/Religious caste systems are a race to the bottom. They are a suicidal purity cult.

          I should note that you are factually wrong. Jews have very rarely been an ethnic majority, yet many cultures have managed to not genocide them throughout history. This includes middle eastern countries prior to the Nakba. Don't project out the utterly imperial eurocentric 'pograms are inevitiable' and 'arabs are all that same, and are savages' viewpoint out onto every civilizations.

          European empires created or exacerbated divisions in peaceful populations as a means of colonial control. This is well documented and intentional. Zionism as a project is very very British, they wrote their plans down! Same as they did in South Africa. Same as they did in Ireland.

    • hackable_sand2 hours ago
      You didn't even try with this one
    • almokhtar3 hours ago
      [flagged]
    • expedition322 hours ago
      You can choose a secular government with equal rights and opportunities for all or found a theocracy.
      • idop2 hours ago
        That government, and its country, will be destroyed in three days.
  • rwmj3 hours ago
    Is this company a candidate for being "Jia Tan"?
    • flipped2 hours ago
      Jia Tan wouldn't be interested in secret spyware firms. They hide their code in plain sight.
    • bpt32 hours ago
      No need, they have plenty of 0-day exploits that don't leave discoverable traces.
  • hparadiz3 hours ago
    Pretending like this some gotcha is pretty funny. The effectiveness of the software hasn't changed. In fact the targets don't even know it's there.
  • embedding-shape3 hours ago
    > Paragon’s founding team not includes the former Israeli PM Ehud Barak, it also includes former Unit 8200 commander Ehud Schneorson, exposing how Israeli intelligence expertise metastisizes into private markets.

    Interestingly enough, turns out Ehud Barak was close to Epstein as well, frequently mentioned in the "newly" released files. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ehud_Barak#Relationship_with_J...

    • pbiggar3 hours ago
      [flagged]
      • fh93023 hours ago
        I would be careful with such allegations. The emails show Ehud Barak first visited the island in 2014, while Virginia claimed the rape happened on the island in 2002.
        • embedding-shape3 hours ago
          > The emails show Ehud Barak first visited the island in 2014

          The current DOJ dump seems to not even be half of all the documents they have available, so don't think we can know for sure yet when the first contact was.

          https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01775... mentions in 2011 for example a meeting with Barak, so who knows when the "first visit to the island" really was.

          You might be right, I just don't think we know for sure yet.

      • huijzer3 hours ago
        Meanwhile "Pending Criminal Charges" is still at zero [1].

        [1]: https://www.pedoarrestcounter.fun/

        • embedding-shape3 hours ago
          To be fair, real investigations just started, the US seems to have been trying to cover it up during these years, but efforts in countries where the government hasn't been compromised (at least on the same level) just got started.
      • baxtr3 hours ago
        You mean Giuffre and not Guthrie right?
        • pbiggar2 hours ago
          Thanks, fixed my comment.
  • iririririr2 hours ago
    this is an Advertisement.

    those companies have very little technical know how. they are just money movers. they buy zero days and package them in a (likely insecure) dashboard.

    now with PE and growth demand, they have to advertise something that is hard to advertise. hence these "slip ups" and articles.

    • PlatoIsADisease2 hours ago
      Interesting marketing idea.

      But yeah I don't think its anything too surprising about buying exploits and packaging them.

      I think the article is more of a commentary on how these companies can exist in the open, where as a teenage hacker goes to jail for stuff like this.

  • PlatoIsADisease3 hours ago
    Questions:

    Why hasnt this been used for stealing Crypto?

    Is there evidence Android OS has been compromised? (I know Samsung phones had an issue)

    Is there any evidence a Fedora, Debian-family, or linux has been compromised?

    • bpt32 hours ago
      > Why hasnt this been used for stealing Crypto?

      Because the information obtained is much more valuable than imaginary tokens.

      > Is there evidence Android OS has been compromised? (I know Samsung phones had an issue)

      I assume every OS can be compromised by a determined adversary.

      > Is there any evidence a Fedora, Debian-family, or linux has been compromised?

      I'm not sure what evidence you would need, but see above.

      • PlatoIsADisease2 hours ago
        Android and Linux's source code is available. So its easy to find flaws and report them. Linux has live a long time and hasn't had major security issues. (Sometimes you get a compromised vendor down the chain in a single distro)

        But also, imaginary tokens are really really valuable. I'm sure there are normal-ish people with ~100-1000 bitcoin, let alone a few of the outspoken people who are bitcoin billionaires.

        • bpt3an hour ago
          "Valuable" is a relative term, and I am confident that the intelligence gathered using these tools is much more valuable to nations that coins that are primarily used for money laundering and other scams.
  • raks61912 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • Rakshithan hour ago
    [dead]
  • throwaway_fjmr3 hours ago
    [dead]
  • howmayiannoyyou3 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • huijzer3 hours ago
      Please don't make this a left vs. right issue. It's a good vs. evil issue.
      • meowface3 hours ago
        My main concern is that these companies will sell to almost anyone willing to buy. The technology itself is not inherently evil (I do want spyware on, say, Ghislaine Maxwell's phone, were she to be released), but the fact that almost any despot can purchase it and use it to brutally suppress dissent is horrible.

        As for Israel itself, same kind of thing. Spyware on Sinwar's phone: completely justified. Spyware on journalists' phones because they're accurately recording and reporting genocidal actions: dystopian. And they're likely to do both.

  • 3 hours ago
    undefined