45 pointsby iSloth5 hours ago9 comments
  • bearjaws4 hours ago
    Feel like I've missed the boat here on OpenClaw.

    What value is it actually producing? It feels like its a bunch of meme projects.

    I get that in theory, it has full chat and desktop access, which could be useful, but seems like nothing useful has been created yet.

    • ekropotin19 minutes ago
      The value it produces is a whole new bunch ways to get your secrets compromised
    • xyzzy1233 hours ago
      There are enthusiasts and early adopters using this in small businesses already. In terms of "practical niche" the use case I've seen so far is "n8n but you create workflows by talking to it" aka business glue to automate idiosyncratic things.

      I think HN being mostly quite technical under estimate the latent demand for ad-hoc business automation by people who know what they want to happen but aren't comfortable writing code.

      You could look at it as a generic replacement for many types of AI SaaS harness. Previously if you wanted to reduce the workload of an office worker say reading work orders (that arrive in 50 different formats via email, sometimes as pdfs or behind portal links) and entering them into job control, you would need to write a custom agent harness or use a SaaS. Now you can sort of "mold" this thing like clay and get it to do the job. Instead of writing an API integration for the job control system you can just give it the openapi spec. Instead of writing your business logic in code, you can describe it in English. If you are technical, you can work with it to turn parts of the workflow into code to reduce token spend or make them more deterministic.

      Naturally, it has all the disadvantages of home built automation (typically limited reproducibility, less secure, not generalised).

      There's a lot of jank and risk but, hiring people can be pretty hit and miss in that regard also so for small businesses it's not as "out of distribution" as you might think.

      Corporate is a different story.

    • shakabrah4 hours ago
      Mostly it seems people are excited about sending a whatsapp message to it and it will turn off all the lights in their office for example. Do similarly for emails, calendars, etc. that is, of course, you’re willing to accept the Faustian bargain it presents you.
  • amai5 hours ago
    OpenClaw will be open as OpenAI.
  • xenospn4 hours ago
    That was quick
  • iSloth5 hours ago
    Amazing how bad Anthropic can miss the boat on this
    • glerk3 hours ago
      1-2 engineers at Anthropic can implement their own OpenClaw in a matter of days (and give it a less stupid name while they're at it).

      This is just a marketing move by OpenAI.

      • hu33 minutes ago
        Even the thousands of integrations?

        The strenght of openclaw is the massive community adherence.

        It can connect to a ton of things.

        It's like the https://zapier.com meets LLMs.

    • mpalmeran hour ago
      Maybe they don't want the idiots' money.
    • creatonez4 hours ago
      Miss the boat on what? Idiotic agents with no sandboxing, with the door fully open for prompt injection purgatory? There's nothing interesting about this technology other than how dumb it is and how badly it will spam the internet (see https://theshamblog.com/an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on... for how bad agent slop has gotten).
  • tgrowazay5 hours ago
    On the Lex podcast, it seemed that Peter liked Mark Zuckerberg more than Sam Altman.

    Maybe it was a move to make Sam come with overwhelming offer.

  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • andsoitis5 hours ago
    > very smart agents, very useful things, extremely multi-agent

    Rad.

  • rvz5 hours ago
    This is an Anthropic fumble and Clawdbot could have been theirs a long time ago instead of going to OpenAI who cleverly outdone them on marketing this fumble.

    Anthropic just made themselves look incredibly bad with the way they handled that when they sent a cease and desist to OpenClaw which that back-fired right in their faces.

    Mistakes have been made.

    • iSloth5 hours ago
      Exactly the same as the OpenCode drama, at this point OpenAI are just getting free customers from common sense.

      Anthropic seem oddly focused on their moat being the app, rather than the underlying intelligence and model. Which is odd when Claude Claude is no better than all the other harnesses.

      • FuckButtons3 hours ago
        I have a suspicion that the reason they’re using react, and the reason they’re trying to keep people using Claude code instead of other tools is because it gives them additional data to train on.
        • fragmede3 hours ago
          It's even simpler than that. They keep trying to get people using Claude code because that's their vendor lock in. That's their business model. They don't want to become a commodity, they want you to use Claude Code. I can't blame them either.
    • andrewinardeer4 hours ago
      I thought Pete mentioned on lex's podcast that anthropic did not send a cease and desist. They kindly asked him to remove all references .to Clawd from the project
      • tempaccount4204 hours ago
        An employee told him they need to rename ASAP or lawyers will get involved. Is that much different from a C&D? Even if he received a formal C&D, he could have done the exact same thing (rename) and be fine.
    • greekrich924 hours ago
      It's a meme project. I'm not a CEO fanboy but Open AI leadership chases hype while Anthropoc's leadership seems more focused on useful things. So the acquisition makes sense.