187 pointsby c4203 hours ago12 comments
  • alehlopeh21 minutes ago
    A lot of you won’t want to hear it but HomeKit + iCloud secure video is the only way to go. For one thing it’s end to end encrypted. You can also do ML stuff like face recognition which happens locally on your Apple TV. And you can set it to trigger HomeKit scenes if eg the person in the video isn’t recognized, or if it recognizes a particular person. Yeah Apple bad, blah blah. But they don’t have an incentive to sell your data.
    • zamadatix4 minutes ago
      When I got an Apple TV I never expected the main value I'd get out of it was being a smart home hub. I do wish the automations were a bit more programmable. Other than that it has been perfect, everything even failed over to my other Apple TV when rearranging the living room without having to think about setting either up as hubs.
    • Marsymars3 minutes ago
      I'm a heavy Apple user (Apple TVs, Mac Mini, iPad), but we also have Android phones in my household, so HomeKit Secure Video is a no-go.

      If Apple ever releases an Apple Home app for Android, I'd transition my entire home over by the time of my next Google Home Premium subscription renewal.

    • jonahx10 minutes ago
      I would like to replace Ring with something fully local.

      Local ML/face recognition would be a bonus. Ability to sync to a private owned server owned by me would be a bonus.

      I'm assuming there are projects out there that would enable this -- does anyone have recommendations?

      • brewtide6 minutes ago
        Frigate NVR tied to a home assistant instance has my phone getting proactive notifications about people, birds, and buses (in their select areas...). It's not the easiest thing to setup, but if you're using ethernet cameras it seems to work very very well. The few POS wyze cameras's I have on the system tend to cause some problems, but I know for a fact it's 100% a combination of a) wifi (no matter how 'quality') b) wyze.

        So, yeah. Look into frigate.

    • willio5816 minutes ago
      And there’s no subscription right?
    • p-e-w11 minutes ago
      There’s actually another alternative: Just don’t install surveillance in your home. Approximately nobody had it 20 years ago. Before asking which unreliable, overpriced, invasive gadget to buy, think about whether you really need any of them.
    • righthand15 minutes ago
      Apple totally sells your data, they just anonymize it first. Why do you think they shifted towards services?

      They also can give the Feds access to your iCloud data through a NSL. Just like Prism.

  • murillians2 hours ago
    Meaning they’ll wait until about June and then quietly roll it out
    • andrei_says_35 minutes ago
      No one being surprised at this statement is an indication of how much enshittification and betrayal we have agreed to accept.

      I’d like to acknowledge the damage I carry as a human being as a result of the pressure to pretend that this is normal. Just because there doesn’t seem to be real alternatives in so many areas of this “free market” /s economy.

    • ToucanLoucan2 hours ago
      Yep. Anyone got alternatives? I love the convenience of a video doorbell but I really really would like to not help the police or ICE or anyone else for that matter unless I decide it's a good idea.
      • acidburnNSA9 minutes ago
        Frigate is incredible. I have 3 instances of it (different homes across the family) running using various amcrest and reolink local-only PoE and Wifi cams. I access the remotely using wireguard. One is running on a 2017 miniatx box (Intel i7-7700T) using openvino to do local-only object detection with the 2017 intel CPU. One is using a Beelink EQ14 Mini PC, Intel Twin Lake N150, also using openvino for object detection (people, dogs, cars, etc). One is using a nvidia 5070 gpu. All notifications are processed via the home assistant integration.

        Truly top-notch quality, full-featured, very low maintenance, easy to set up, cheap to operate. I'm glad so many people are using it now.

        For video doorbell I just have a cam that can see the front door and I drew a box around the area I want notifications for. When a person enters the box, I get a notification and snapshot.

        https://docs.frigate.video/

      • baby_soufflean hour ago
        > Yep. Anyone got alternatives?

        The self-hosted and home-automation and home-assistant subreddits are _full_ of discussion threads on this. The good news is that you have a TON of options to pick from. The bad news is that they're all deficient in one way or another so you really do have to spend a bit of time to figure out who executes best on the things you care most about.

        If you don't mind the lock-in, Unifi is nice. Reolink (and the other DaHua re-brands) usually leave a lot to be desired in terms of software / quality but they are cheap and they reliably spit out a regular video stream that can be used with just about any software. Just don't let them onto the WAN!

        • yndoendoan hour ago
          Are there any such systems for general users that don't want to manage or maintain such systems?

          Alternatives really need to be for the masses that have little Knowles in server hosting.

          This is one reason I invest in Linux Smartphone company's that are work towards a clean solution for the masses. Daily drivers that are satisfactory for us build the stepping stones to walk to the alternative.

        • dyauspitr41 minutes ago
          Any non-Chinese, plug and play systems? Does simplisafe offer on premise video surveillance?
      • keraf2 hours ago
        Got the UniFi Doorbell from Ubiquiti and I'm really happy with it. It's hooked up to my Dream Machine, records video on disk and I access it via Tailscale. Not paying any subscription and it doesn't live in a cloud.
      • jszymborskian hour ago
        Reolink has doorbell cameras[0] that you can keep disconnected from the internet. They also have some pretty useful local recording hubs if self-hosting is not your deal[1].

        [0] https://reolink.com/ca/product/reolink-video-doorbell-wifi/

        [1] https://reolink.com/ca/product/reolink-home-hub/

        • dawnerd21 minutes ago
          Reolink also fixed a problem with some of their cameras that prevented them from working with scrypted fully. I have a bunch now completely isolated from the internet and linked through HomeKit.
      • andrewxdiamond2 hours ago
        you can use a company that is self hosted like Unifi and have complete control over your data, still have remote access, and not pay a subscription. “self hosted” scares people off but its literally a box you plug in and forget about. Pretty trivial.

        I dont understand why anyone chooses Ring when the costs of Unifi are so much better.

        The ring app also sucks imo and all their hardware is quite slow.

        • bagels2 hours ago
          Honestly, that commercial convinced me to dump my Nest cameras because, eventually (if not already), they'll do the same.
      • marricksan hour ago
        Normal door bells are pretty great and have less overhead and maintenance...

        All tech puts it's best foot forward, some of it's really nifty, but a camera on every street corner is always going to pose more risks than it's worth IMO...

        It's work to go back to the old ways but I think this is one we step we should really all take.

      • rtkwe2 hours ago
        I use Amcrest's AD410. I don't pay for their cloud, have my own NVR, and can access them through Wireguard if I'm out of the house.
        • acidburnNSAa few seconds ago
          This is the way. Do you use frigate for NVR or something else?
      • nerdsniperan hour ago
        Reolink with Frigate NVR. Can also put Home Assistant on the same box. Pretty much any 12+ gen intel CPU with QSV should be able to handle the encoding for streaming to your device. Probably will want to use tailscale so that you don’t have to open any ports.
      • roamerz41 minutes ago
        I’ve been pretty happy with Reolink. No subscription required and uses local storage. Notifications are done through smtp which works pretty well. Mobile app is pretty solid as well.
      • lightingthedarkan hour ago
        I have a Reolink doorbell. It records to a SD card and works great with my Home Assistant setup. So much better than the Ring it replaced.
        • jayofdooman hour ago
          Hard agree. I have their doorbell and some of the wifi light fixtures (that go into mains power). They integrate great with home assistant and record locally.
      • dgxyz2 hours ago
        We've got an analogue video phone on our apartment. Works flawlessly. No digital path other than the ring selection. Has a flat monochrome CRT which is kind of cool.

        I made it half a century without a doorbell in my phone. I don't need it now.

        • kstrauseran hour ago
          Eh. I have a Logitech Circle View, and appreciate seeing whether it's a delivery person or some rando selling vacuum cleaners. It also pops up a picture of the person on our TV and chimes my phone, so even if we have the music up or we're not at home, we can still see that someone's there. I like these.
      • righthandan hour ago
        Yi cameras are supposed to be local if you dont get a subscription.
      • LazyMansan hour ago
        None of these agencies get your video data without your consent. The feature was designed so they have an easy way to present you the request for footage.

        Unfortunately a portion of the information getting circulated is the complete opposite.

        • drnick1an hour ago
          > None of these agencies get your video data without your consent.

          You certainly can't be sure of that. In fact, it is almost certain that these companies provide the data they collect to the police and government agencies data, often without warrant.

        • i_love_retrosan hour ago
          Doesn't matter, unless you're an asshole you shouldn't continue to give money to companies like Ring that partner with ICE or Flock.

          I'm not an asshole so I cancelled my subscription.

        • array_key_firstan hour ago
          Yes, for now. But ultimately you have no control or say over these features because you do not own the software or data. You must have pure blind faith that this will be the way it continues to work.

          If other people are cool with doing things without any reasons and based on pure trust, that's on them. But that's not gonna be me

        • SoftTalker27 minutes ago
          If you don't own the entire stack you don't decide who does what with the data.
        • wat10000an hour ago
          I'm certain they get your video data without your consent when the agencies have a warrant. I think it's very likely that they won't necessarily require a warrant, either.

          Consider the Nancy Guthrie case. The owner wasn't around to give consent, and the camera didn't even have an active subscription, yet law enforcement was still able to recover video from Google's systems.

          The only way it could be as you say is if the video was only stored locally without any remote access, or if the video was encrypted with keys only you control. Google clearly is not doing this. I really, really doubt Amazon is.

  • dgxyz2 hours ago
    This is a temporary rollback while there’s a choice to speak against it.

    Cloud connected doorbells must die as well as dragnet surveillance.

    • dylan604an hour ago
      > Cloud connected doorbells must die as well as dragnet surveillance.

      I'd disagree and restate that cloud services willing to make these kinds of deals must die, painfully, in a fire after being stung by a million killer bees, after receiving a million paper cuts and having lemon juice poured all over them.

      It is possible for a company to charge a monthly fee to provide a service and only that service without attempting to leverage their users and their data for any other form of income. Companies used to do it all of the time. It just takes a C-suite/board/founder to have the moral fortitude to not sell out their users.

      • trinsic237 minutes ago
        The problem now is how can you trust any of these companies? The infrastructure is there to link this data if you have cameras that connect to the internet. How can you ever be sure this wont happen in secret? We have no guarantees that companies will follow the laws and laws are not even being enforced.
      • camillomiller16 minutes ago
        No it is not. Your mandate is to grow your company’s revenue and profits, not act according to your conscience as an executive, especially if something is not illegal.

        This is why regulations are extremely important. There need to be a strong enough counterincentive or companies will eventually always follow the path of least resistance to growth. Ethics when present may create some form of friction along some specific paths, but it’s never enough for those to not become, eventually, that very path.

      • antonvsan hour ago
        > It just takes a C-suite/board/founder to have the moral fortitude ...

        Just for context, could you provide some examples of such people?

        • macki06 minutes ago
          Craig Newmark (Craigslist) and Jimmy Wales (Wikipedia) come to mind, both founders could have made platfoms that would have been ad-ridden (and made a boat full of cash) but the founders chose not to
    • ProllyInfamous2 hours ago
      I worked in large union data centers, decades ago.

      Cannot even imagine what is going on these days, inside & out.

      • ohyoutravel2 hours ago
        Can you elaborate? This is interesting
        • ProllyInfamous2 hours ago
          I worked across several facilities and obviously cannot talk specifics about those. It is public knowledge that one of them housed a large metro area's main ISP "meet-me room."

          During Snowden revelations I'd already been apprenticing for years; nothing Edward documented surprised me. I'd literally walk around our 500,000sqft elevated floors knodding my head [none of this exists, officially].

          ----

          Nothing is as it seems.

          ----

          During DEF CON ~XX~ (approximately same timeframe as story above) it was publicly revealed that intelligence communities had redefined the word "intercept," to mean when a human operator catelogs a certain piece of data/traffic (i.e. not algorithms sorting). #1984 #newspeak #elevenyearsago

          ----

          I no longer carry a cell phone. Don't use email. PO Box in profile

          • dgxyz2 hours ago
            Yeah well aware of that stuff here. Two companies I worked at had entirely airgapped infrastructure because they knew the adversarial situation wasn't winnable. Everything was checked for implants at goods in. It's shocking some of the shit that goes on.

            I run grey man where I can. Stuff that's private stays private. Paper and physical security is still good.

          • King-Aaronan hour ago
            > I no longer carry a cell phone.

            I'm not quite there yet, but after Netanyahu made that comment like "if you have a phone you're carrying a little piece of Israel with you" right after the pager attack stuff.. I keep the phone in the back of my backpack away from my meat bits.

    • doctor_radium2 hours ago
      Agreed, but this would then inconvenience millions of non-techies.

      Could a solution be forcing Amazon (and Google and Flock and...) to open their backend software either for self-hosting or for running on somebody else's "cloud"? So subscribing to such a device isn't that different from getting web hosting from Dreamhost or Hetzner?

      Maybe there's a host or IP field in the settings that users can easily change?

      • syntheticnaturean hour ago
        If there was an IP setting users could change, all the self-hosting etc. forums would be talking about how to change it instead of explaining other options. I'd expect not just fixed hosts and an ecosystem dependent on their proprietary protocols, but also pinned certificates and secure boot so you can't change any of it.

        N.B. Flock isn't really targeting the consumer market.

      • dgxyzan hour ago
        I know this is not constructive, but fuck 'em and their convenience!
  • mandeepj2 hours ago
    “Canceled” for now. Maybe it was just a video, they’ll continue with the “quiet” development and slowly launch it
  • minimaxir2 hours ago
    Which Super Bowl LX ads haven't backfired yet?
    • ramuel2 hours ago
      The Anthropic one? Although I'm sure they'll put ads into claude eventually
      • rwc2 hours ago
        Early audience response suggested the message struggled to land. According to an iSpot survey of 500 viewers, the ad’s likeability score placed it in the bottom 3% compared with Super Bowl ads over the past five years. Its top-two-box purchase intent scored 24% below Super Bowl norms and 19% below ads in its category that aired over the last 90 days. Viewers most commonly described their reaction as “WTF,” signaling confusion around both the message and the execution.

        https://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/super-bowl-revealed-a...

        • SrslyJoshan hour ago
          I think that the ideas of AI boosters and other tech maximalists will pretty much always "struggle to land" with normal people. (See also: the ring ad.)
    • 2 hours ago
      undefined
  • roganp2 hours ago
    I hope everyone will remember how eagerly AMZN's subsidiary was willing to sell it's cameras to whomever was willing to pay.
  • vgeek2 hours ago
    Spiderman pointing at Spiderman?
    • RupertSalt2 hours ago
      Daily Struggle over two buttons labeled "RECOVER LOST PUPPY" and "DEPORT NEIGHBORS"
      • bagelsan hour ago
        Is it a struggle for them? Clearly they're pressing both buttons.
        • hikkerlan hour ago
          Who wouldn't?
          • lovich10 minutes ago
            People who aren’t psychopaths.

            To be clear, I’m claiming you are one based on that question.

    • dgxyz2 hours ago
      The tech industry is a bloody Spider-Man pointing orgy at this point.
      • culi2 hours ago
        The success case for much of silicon valley seems to be government contracts. Gov't is the polite way of saying military
  • sneakan hour ago
    > Following intense backlash to its partnership with Flock Safety, a surveillance technology company that works with law enforcement agencies, Ring has announced it is canceling the integration.

    Ring (owned by Amazon, who runs a private airgapped AWS region for the CIA onsite at Langley) also works with law enforcement agencies.

  • RupertSalt2 hours ago
    Now whenever the cameras detect a lost dog, all your neighbors' phones begin playing "Angel" by Sarah McLachlan
    • throwway120385an hour ago
      They also play this when the cameras in your house detect you using more than one square of toilet paper at a time.
  • mrcwinnan hour ago
    An aside: The Verge’s paywall is ridiculous, especially given that they still live off slimy affiliate revenue and ads that run directly counter to their own editorializing. Their smugness and superiority given their business model makes me wish we had better alternatives.
    • donohoe9 minutes ago
      The writers and editors don’t dictate how the business side monetizes the content.
  • nipperkinfeet2 hours ago
    Continue reading with a Verge subscription. Stop posting links to paywall sites.