Sean, I've never accused anyone of controlling my mind. That was merely the first instance of Cowen perjuring himself, which is implied by the WAPO article itself. Funny enough, another phony federal judge in DC just repeated that same smear a few months ago -- even as I'm suing Cowen for lying and the WAPO for printing it.

Cowen also lied during testimony about being a federal employee along with the other 2 suspects I identified in 2014. Cowen further lied about knowing Peter Thiel who runs the federal surveillance system, aka Palantir, aka CIA.

The U.S. courts are literally fake, run by the same agency: https://drive.proton.me/urls/SQ83YZ4EAC#JNh9Fjijb1b6

Does that include the courts? I'm afraid off-grid comms aren't going to solve this particular problem, which is why I'm seeking protection from competing sovereigns.

So not Twitter, fb, YouTube, TikTok, instagram, gmail, or a website that relies of Google for reach.

What do you recommend for getting a message out that which people can see?

Yep. And hardly a modern or gov't-specific thing. Go back 150 years, and how many small-town papers do you think would publish content critical of themselves?

I know, right? If the IME were installed on the boot ROM and easily deactivated, then we could assume it was just a feature for IT admins to run remote updates on fleets of computers. The fact that they chained it to the processors inside the SOC is a dead giveaway for mandatory backdoor. Where are the lawsuits?

I mean, how do people think Palantir is able to sell access to everyone's "phone calls, emails, money, or any other material flows?” See Munn, Luke. "Seeing With Software: Palantir and the regulation of life.” Studies in Control Societies, 2017 (https://www.academia.edu/download/67734248/Seeing_With_Softw...) (describing Palantir's Gotham Platform which is used by governments around the world).

It's as if no one has ever heard of the Fourth Amendment, e.g. Carpenter v. US, 585 U.S. 296, 138 S. Ct. 2206, 201 L. Ed. 2d 507 (2018).