13 pointsby melling6 hours ago1 comment
  • bediger40005 hours ago
    Good to see WSJ specifically naming Trump - he should get credit if it works, and be accountable if it doesn't, or if it has horrendous side effects.
    • melling5 hours ago
      “The reversal targets the 2009 “endangerment finding,” which concluded that six greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health and welfare. The finding provided the legal underpinning for the Environmental Protection Agency’s climate rules, which limited emissions from power plants and tightened fuel-economy standards for vehicles under the Clean Air Act.”

      What does it mean “if it works “?