What exactly do you need?
The question is: is the date mismatch an accident or is it not.
Literally what I need. Context. Whether errors like this are common in this format. If anyone has noted this before.
Either it was a clerical error or it wasn't. Sometimes that happens. Did it happen this time?
There are absolutely quality sources that can walk through the uncertainties and the contexts. A secondary source based on The Daily Mail is not that. (Most ad-only sources won’t have the resources for that.)
The FBI says, it's no more damp than it always is. A third party says, this is uncharacteristically damp.
A neutral credentialed source gives you uncertainty: we see dampness of varying rates throughout history and you should consider the climate you're in in order to understand how damp it really is.
Great. Now what do you do with that? Go outside and determine whether you need a coat.
No one will be able to tell you what this means without more evidence.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/epstein-files-reveal-prosecuto...
More news sources does not increase reputability. Most of them are social media bottom feeders and forgot how to do the basics of journalism
The easiest way to have this happen is to have a human type the date, and have them make a mistake. (Ever put the wrong date on a check?) But there's not enough info in the article to know if that's a possibility here.
And there's plenty of reason to think it was something other than suicide. Two checks in a row got skipped, and two cameras malfunctioned, all in the same night? And someone mistyped the date on the statement? All just coincidence? That seems... improbable.
So, while I can see that there could be an innocent explanation, I'm not convinced that there is one.
On the other hand, as far as I can recall, nothing significant happened after the Panama Papers, so.
If they wanted it to stay quiet, throw him in solitary and don’t allow any visitors until he dies of old age.