The government’s red ink is our black ink. The trouble is “safe savings” doesn’t have the same air of doom about it.
The article literally says that they earn more because they work more hours on average.
However, pointing to a different country that achieved success with “eugenic” immigration (it’s not even clear what you mean given that Singapore has had very high immigration but for the sake of argument let’s assume it’s the opposite of whatever the study here found) does not invalidate or disprove that the U.S. deficit reduced due to U.S. immigration.
It’s the kind of logical fallacy one would hope a 4 year old would grow out of, and yet…