Google has every advantage in AI. So why doesn't it lead?
1 pointby HardCodedBias6 hours ago5 comments
  • knollimar5 hours ago
    Ive found gemini to have the best vision by far.
    • HardCodedBias4 hours ago
      Probably true.

      Not sure about “by far”. But probably best.

      • knollimar13 minutes ago
        It processes symbolic (nok programming) graphs significantly better than models not named opus 4.X for X>=5.

        Haven't tested 4.6 for my workflow. Will report if its so good that im jobless on monday

  • us3215 hours ago
    Fear, too much to lose.
  • rvz5 hours ago
    Google would have been broken up a long time ago if they released Gemini much earlier than OpenAI.
  • verdverm5 hours ago
    Gemini 3 is so new, that it's still in preview

    Just because two big AI announced new models this week doesn't mean Google is behind. Gemini 3 isn't even 2 months old

    Gemini is used in a lot of agentic setups. It's my primary.

    Gemini users don't act like a cult like Claude users

    Also look at how Google is now selling their TPU, everyone wants that more than Nvidia chips now, but only a very select few will ever get them

    • HardCodedBias4 hours ago
      Gemini 3 is in preview and it is pretty clearly behind multiple iterations for OAI and Ant.

      It may even be behind open source at this point.

      Seem telling.

      Gemini is used in agentic setups by literally dozens of people. Dozens!

      • verdverm4 hours ago
        OpenAI is the only Big AI player who has been unable to train a model from scratch going on two years (since Ilya left) the 5 series is refinement of 4

        But please, do go on about who's behind, specifically can you clarify how you see them as multiple iterations behind and why the Waymo world model, AlphaGo/Fold, MedGemma, and the many other models they create don't seem to count towards this?

  • UncleKeynes3 hours ago
    [dead]