18 pointsby geox6 hours ago13 comments
  • ceejayoz5 hours ago
    Nice to see the admin can even flub basic math.

    https://imgur.com/a/XCQr5EP

    $1,449 --> $252 is "93% off", apparently?

    • EricRiese5 hours ago
      This is the guy that promised 1000% discounts on drugs.
    • montroser4 hours ago
      You know they started with 83% in there and then orange man insisted they change the "8" to a "9".
  • josefresco5 hours ago
    Hm, I wonder what Mark Cuban who runs costplusdrugs.com thinks of this. He hasn't commented that I can see yet https://bsky.app/profile/mcuban.bsky.social
    • bityard5 hours ago
      I haven't heard of this but he must be pretty proud of it, the page title is literally, "Homepage of Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drugs", his name is in the logo, and the picture is on the front page.
      • josefresco4 hours ago
        The branding is... weird. I always thoughts it was just a campaigning tactic for Mark's upcoming presidential bid but given how things have played out, now I'm not so sure.
        • razingeden7 minutes ago
          [delayed]
        • toomuchtodo3 hours ago
          It's using Mark's brand to juice marketing scale organically.
    • Johnny5555 hours ago
      It's a much different service that Costplus

      Costplus manufactures and sells drugs at a small markup over manufacturing cost.

      TrumpRX appears to be more of a central clearinghouse where drug makers can offer discounts to consumers. And at least so far, they seem to be the same discounts that they already offer, when you look up a drug on the site, it redirects you to the manufacturer's website.

      Maybe it's useful for people without insurance that don't know how to search look for discount programs to help them buy drugs and maybe some manufacturers will offer discounts on the site that aren't available otherwise, but it's not a competitor to Cuban's site.

  • charles_f4 hours ago
    The name of that website is interesting. I had heard of landmarks being named after politicians, laws being nicknamed after them (e.g. obamacare) or after judicial decisions, but it seems that it's usually, at least seemingly, by others. This one is directly named after the president launching it. I can't think of a precedent, was there one?
    • michaelteter3 hours ago
      Incidentally, it was GOP who branded the Affordable Care Act as Obamacare in an effort to make it seem bad. Obama never asked for or wanted that name, although he later accepted it.

      Trump, as we know, has an insatiable need for recognition and attempts to put his name on everything he can.

  • pupppet5 hours ago
    When Democrats regain power, what are Republicans going to complain about after 8 years of giving their guy the green light to do anything.
  • ortusdux5 hours ago
    Reports are that this is just a rebranded GoodRx.
  • sxp5 hours ago
    > "White House launches direct-to-consumer drug site..."

    > "The site is not selling drugs directly to American patients..."

    Just another layer of middlemen. They should go with the proper free market option and allow Americans to buy medication from other countries.

    • johannes12343215 hours ago
      How could the Trump family then directly benefit from it?
      • michaelteter3 hours ago
        Ego. Brand. But there is likely some financial angle buried in the plans somewhere.
      • unsnap_biceps2 hours ago
        https://arstechnica.com/health/2026/01/trumprx-delayed-as-se...

            There’s already reason to be suspicious of conflicts of interest with TrumpRx, the senators note. There’s a “potential relationship between TrumpRx and an online dispensing company, BlinkRx, on whose Board the President’s son, Donald Trump, Jr., has sat since February 2025,” the senators write.
  • eykanal5 hours ago
    So playing "skeptic in a vacuum" for a minute—i.e., pretending that I don't know anything about this administration, and not having done any research beyond reading the linked article—this seems like a pretty good thing. Insurance companies negotiate tremendous discounts for pharmaceuticals, which means that people without insurance are often majorly screwed when trying to buy medicine. Having the government act as a negotiator with the drug companies to obtain similar discounts for the uninsured seems to be a positive move.

    Happy to have someone explain to me why this is a bad take.

    • ceejayoz3 hours ago
      That's not actually what's happening here.

      They're the same self-pay deals the companies offer to the public already.

      Wejovy, for example: https://www.novocare.com/content/dam/novonordisk/novocare/re...

      (Or you can go through a compounding pharmacy for even cheaper. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/hims-hers-launch-of-compou...)

    • happytoexplain5 hours ago
      Assuming there's nothing wrong with it technically (scam, misleading, mishandling, whatever), then yeah, nothing wrong your take. It's just the obvious meta-problems: His name being on it creates trust issues and reluctance (and inversely: blind trust on the other side). Even just regarding image and principles: Most people justifiably hate the idea of a prideful asshole putting his name front and center on a government service - they want the comport of a president to be the opposite of a cartoonish car salesman. They might tolerate it if the guy in question doesn't cultivate that image (e.g. Obamacare), but even then, they don't want the guy to officially name it that (e.g. ACA) because that would again contribute to the image of petty self-advertisement. Of course this "normal" human psychology gets short-circuited with enough hate ("I don't like that behavior. Oh wait, my enemies also don't like? Now I like it.").
      • montroser4 hours ago
        Obamacare was dubbed as such by Republicans, not by Obama himself. The R's meant for it to be derogatory.
    • stvltvs5 hours ago
      A step closer to Medicare for all?
      • montroser4 hours ago
        Can't tell if this is serious or a joke? This site he launched is literally like Groupon for drugs, for people who don't have health insurance. It's mostly nothing, but if anything it is a step toward normalizing not having health insurance.
  • tmaly5 hours ago
    Is this like Trump University?
    • 5 hours ago
      undefined
    • chneu5 hours ago
      Another scam? Yes
  • ranger_danger5 hours ago
    He is desperate to come up with a grift with his name on it because he's jealous of Obamacare, which was even named by Republicans, even though they also somehow think the ACA isn't the exact same thing.
  • moogly3 hours ago
    Yet another scam[1], just like "no tax on overtime".

    [1]: https://newrepublic.com/post/206265/trump-prescription-drug-...

  • arghandugh5 hours ago
    [dead]
  • behole5 hours ago
    [flagged]