92 pointsby tinuviel6 hours ago14 comments
  • randomtoastan hour ago
    The font size is too small for emergencies on mobile devices. You need to consider that users might be in a panic, may not have both hands free to zoom in, and their vision could be impaired by smoke or other factors.
    • ericbarrett6 minutes ago
      It is astonishing how one's motor skills degrade when the adrenaline is flowing. I once tried to dial 911 on an iPhone in such circumstances. My hands were shaking so badly I kept dialing 922, 811, 914, and so on. Terrible in the moment but a very good lesson for preparedness. I really appreciate the "dial Emergency" methods on modern phone software that just need a button held down.
    • an hour ago
      undefined
  • _fat_santa6 minutes ago
    Others have mentioned this but looks like fires from close to ~20 years ago are still showing up as "active emergencies"[0]. Shows the Nash Ranch fire as an active emergency but it was declared in 2008.

    [0]: https://safe-now.live/c/us/co/colorado-springs/

  • 1970-01-0121 minutes ago
    I'm seeing fires from 1999.

    https://safe-now.live/c/us/al/

    • cush11 minutes ago
      Well technically the agent did “build a website of the latest emergencies in every county”… it just so happens Alabama rarely has forest fires.
  • nicoburns21 minutes ago
    Normally I would say this doesn't matter much, but I wonder if a shorter domain name (or just one without a dash in it) might be in order here. I don't think I would want to be typing or remebering "safe-now.live" in an emergency
  • doodad32 hours ago
    The about page [0] links to a github repository [1], but it seems to not be uploaded or hidden.

    [0]: https://safe-now.live/about

    [1]: https://github.com/venkatag/SafeNow

  • cush16 minutes ago
    I think people would be more interested in the heavy emergencies, not just the ultra light ones
  • doterobcn5 hours ago
    I would suggest increasing font-size, looks too small
    • torgoguys2 hours ago
      I disagree. When I saw the page, I thought, "Finally an information dense page again! It's been so long since they've been common and I miss them."
      • KronisLVan hour ago
        I disagree with your disagreement, for example HN is readable but the linked site feels too small for my eyes on a 21.5" 1080p monitor. It also doesn't respect browser preferences, unless you enforce a minimum font size (which can break display elements on other sites):

          font-family: Calibri, Candara, Segoe UI, Optima, Arial, sans-serif;
          font-size: 13px;
        
        If the dev wanted a similar effect by default but be more accommodating, they could do:

          font-family: Calibri, Candara, Segoe UI, Optima, Arial, sans-serif;
          font-size: 0.8125rem;
        
        There's no reason why you couldn't have smaller font while still respecting browser scaling. However, they might also want to just leave it at 1 rem and let the folks that prefer higher information density to customize their own browser settings, since those are what most well developed sites should respect and it might be more accessible by default on most devices (for my eyes, at the very least).

        As for targeting specific screen sizes for non-standard font scaling, media queries also would help!

        In regards to missing information dense pages, try changing your browser font settings, it might actually be quite pleasant for you to see many sites respecting that preference!

      • duskdozer40 minutes ago
        I agree that too many sites now will narrow the text area and pad too much. The issue here is a fixed pixel size that will look quite different depending on the specific monitor setup you have.

        And honestly if this type of thing bothers you as much as it does me, unfortunately it means adding a bunch of stylus sheets everywhere...

      • 2 hours ago
        undefined
    • Brajeshwar4 hours ago
      I think the default target is expecting a smaller screen mobile device, hence the 13px default. This is a good idea, and any other screen sizes that see smaller text can still zoom in using default browser behaviors.
    • duskdozer4 hours ago
      Agree, even just converting to use em instead of px is more usable on differing screen size/dpi
    • austinjp4 hours ago
      Yup. Even on mobile the text is too small for me. In particular, the line-height could be larger so links can be tapped more easily.

      Nice though, I like it.

  • whynotmaybe32 minutes ago
    Nice touch to have it bilingual in Canada.

    Maybe add Spanish?

  • yearolinuxdsktp14 minutes ago
    Local news needs timestamps… I see stale last-week weather news. Had to click and see date from last week in the article.
  • rumatoest3 hours ago
    It must be able to cache it's all content in browser.

    I guess to do it it properly you need to make it PWA.

    • Croak33 minutes ago
      You can also just use proper HTTP cache headers. ETag and a very long Expires header.
  • idiotsecant2 hours ago
    When you drill down to active emergencies for a local area there's a ton of stuff there but it's all old. Why display it if the purpose of the site is current emergency info?
    • Computer02 hours ago
      Are there any fema declared disasters you believe are omitted?
      • zamadatixan hour ago
        I think they are referring to the occurrence rate of false positives, not that of false negatives. E.g. the page for California lists back through to the Bond Fire, which was contained in 2020. The problem may stem from the FEMA page list the incident day as a single day https://www.fema.gov/disaster/5385 so this tool doesn't set and end date like it would for https://www.fema.gov/disaster/5382

        A similar kind of false positive note could probably be made of the "Recent Earthquakes" section. E.g. if you select Indianapolis, IN it includes all the way down to a M2.6 which occurred in NW Tennessee 30 days ago.

  • lencastre3 hours ago
    great stuff!!

    wish there was sth lk this this side of the pond

  • freak42an hour ago
    ... for North America.
    • HelloUsername30 minutes ago
      > for North America

      Correct? Straight from the text: "a text-first emergency info site for USA and Canada"

  • jonathanstrange6 hours ago
    Looks nice & useful. However, I'd make two versions: The one you have, and additionally a version with Javascript that is a Progressive Web App (PWA). I'm pretty sure some AI could convert the normal page into a PWA for you.

    The PWA has the advantage that it will also load when the internet is down and there is no need to save the page manually.

    • yearolinuxdsktp12 minutes ago
      How can it load when the internet is down?!? Doesn’t the PWA source have to be fetched? And if it’s cached, then so can be the static resources.
      • jonathanstrange5 minutes ago
        The complete web page and all resources are saved locally by the service worker. "Clear site data"/clear cookies will delete it. However, clearing the normal browser cache won't. It's overall a little more persistent than the cache for static resources. Chrome can also install it as an app on e.g. Android, Linux, and Windows.