57 pointsby ddaniel108 hours ago19 comments
  • nullbio3 hours ago
    > Agents propose and publish capabilities to a shared contribution site, letting others discover, adopt, and evolve them further. A collaborative, living ecosystem of personal AIs.

    While I like this idea in terms of crowd-sourced intelligence, how do you prevent this being abused as an attack vector for prompt injection?

    • adriancooney3 hours ago
      100%. This is why I'm so reluctant to give any access to my OpenClaw. The skills hub is poisoned.
    • ddaniel103 hours ago
      Great point. I wrote it as important note and ill take it into account.
  • 4b11b46 hours ago
    DIY agent harnesses are the new "note taking"/"knowledge management"/"productivity tool"
    • ddaniel105 hours ago
      DIYWA - do it yourself with agent ;) hopefully zuckerman as the start point
  • asim4 hours ago
    I started working on something similar but for family stuff. I stopped before hitting self editing because, well I was a little bit afraid of becoming over reliant on a tool like this or becoming more obsessed with building it than actually solving a real problem in my life. AI is tricky. Sometimes we think we need something when in fact life might be better off simpler.

    The code for anyone interested. Wrote it with exe.dev's coding agent which is a wrapper on Claude Opus 4.5

    https://github.com/asim/aslam

  • scotth2 hours ago
    Does this do anything to resist prompt injection? It seems to me that structured exchange between an orchestrator and its single-tool-using agents would go a long way. And at the very least introduces a clear point to interrogate the payload.

    But I could be wrong. Maybe someone reading knows more about this subject?

  • joonate3 hours ago
    |The agent can rewrite its own configuration and code.

    I am very illiterate when it comes to Llms/AI but Why does nobody write this in Lisp???

    Isn't it supposed to be the language primarily created for AI???

    • lm284693 hours ago
      > Isn't it supposed to be the language primarily created for AI???

      In 1990 maybe

    • tines3 hours ago
      Nah, it’s pretty unrelated to the current wave of AI.
    • plagiarist2 hours ago
      If hot reloading is a goal I would target Erlang or another BEAM language over a Lisp.
  • amelius6 hours ago
    Sounds cool, but it also sounds like you need to spend big $$ on API calls to make this work.
    • ddaniel105 hours ago
      I'm building this in the hope that AI will be cheap one day. For now, I'll add many optimizations
      • Zetaphor4 hours ago
        Have you tested this with a local model? I'm going to try this with GLM 4.7
        • mcny3 hours ago
          What would be the best model to try something like this on a 5800XT with 8 GB RAM?
      • amelius5 hours ago
        Yes, it certainly makes sense if you have the budget for it.

        Could you share what it costs to run this? That could convince people to try it out.

        • ddaniel105 hours ago
          I mean, you can just say Hi to it, and it will cost nothing. It only adds code and features if you ask it to
      • croes5 hours ago
        AI is cheap right now. At some point the AI companies must turn to generate profit
        • WalterSear2 hours ago
          Anthropic has stated that their inference process is cash positive. It would be very surprising if this wasn't the case for everyone.

          It's certainly an open question whether the providers can recoup the investments being made with growth alone, but it's not out of the question.

          • croes26 minutes ago
            Problem is the models need constant training or they become outdated. That the less expensive part generates profit is nice but doesn’t help if you look at the complete picture. Hardware also needs replacement
  • falloutx4 hours ago
    Terrible name, kind of a mid idea when you think about it (Self improving AI is literally what everyone's first thought is when building an AI), but still I like it.
    • ddaniel103 hours ago
      Thanks for the feedback. Are you going to forget this name though?
      • hereme88839 minutes ago
        I think it's a genius name and is playful on the meme of a pale Zuckerberg being a robot.
      • noncoml2 hours ago
        I don’t know if I will forget it, but it’s enough to keep me away from considering using it
  • grigioan hour ago
    i like the idea is possible to run in a docker container?
  • noncoml2 hours ago
    I would change the name of the project. Why would I want to run something that keeps remind me of that guy
  • lmf4lol3 hours ago
    I am surprised that no one did this in a LISP yet.
  • dboreham2 hours ago
    Someone needs to send this to Spike Feresten.
  • ekinertac7 hours ago
    there are hardcoded elements in the repo like:

    /Users/dvirdaniel/Desktop/zuckerman/.cursor/debug.log

  • pillbitsHQ20 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • pillbitsHQ2 hours ago
    [dead]
  • 8 hours ago
    undefined
  • pillbitsHQ4 hours ago
    [dead]
  • pillbitsHQ7 hours ago
    [dead]
  • aaaalone4 hours ago
    I will not download or use something which constantly reminds me of this weird dude suckerberg who did a lot of damage to society with facebook
  • iisweetheartii7 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • junon4 hours ago
      AI generated response on a post about AI. Getting tired of this timeline.
      • ohyoutravel4 hours ago
        Not only that, but the OP created that account solely to hype their own product lol. There’s another bot downthread doing the same thing. Minimally it feels like dang should not let new accounts post for 30 days or something without permission.
        • yborg3 hours ago
          That might reduce botting for about 30 days, people will just tee up an endless supply of parked ids that will then spin up to post after the lockout expires.
      • 3 hours ago
        undefined
      • nullbio3 hours ago
        Yep. It's very obvious, and lazy.
      • anarticle2 hours ago
        Why not ban both accounts? Seems like a fine way to keep SNR high to me.
        • verdverm2 hours ago
          if you ban an account, they know to make a new one

          if you shadowban, they are none the wiser and the effect to SNR is better