Interesting take. I think the real question isn't whether we're "claudemaxxing" but whether the mental model of treating AI as a tool vs collaborator matters.

Anecdotally, I've found better results when I treat Claude less like a search engine and more like a pair programmer - giving it context, asking it to reason through problems, and iterating on its output rather than expecting perfect first responses.

The name is funny though. What's next, GPTpilling?

> Humans are the bottleneck. Claude's output quality is proportional to what you give it.

> Shows the most basic AGENTS.md possible