88 pointsby surprisetalk8 hours ago12 comments
  • potatosalad994 hours ago
    I love how there is a Catalan version too! I guess it’s probably a requirement for getting the .cat domain.
    • maxbond40 minutes ago
      https://icannwiki.org/.cat

      > Administered by the non-profit Fundació puntCAT under the oversight of ICANN, registrations are available only to individuals and organizations demonstrating use or promotion of the Catalan language and culture.

    • hbnan hour ago
      Does look to be the case.

      nyan.cat has a language picker that includes Catalan, even though it just changes the page title.

  • nkriscan hour ago
    Is the picture for 303 meant to be the device from Heisenberg’s thought experiment?
  • carlos-menezes3 hours ago
    There's an alternative[0] for the canine lovers.

    [0]: https://httpstatusdogs.com

  • montroser41 minutes ago
    Nginx makin' up status codes...
  • npodbielskian hour ago
    450 gave me good chuckle
  • taherm7894 hours ago
    Love http and love cats
  • t1234s2 hours ago
    Do any browsers recognize a 420 response code?
    • graypegg2 hours ago
      Your browser (if you're using one of the "usual ones") doesn't really do much with the response's status code if it doesn't match a few specific ones for redirecting/caching/protocol shenanigans.

      Anything in the 4XX range is going to be treated as just a regular ol' response, just like 404. (You could serve an entire site with all responses set to status=404, and be fine... other than probably never getting any cache hits) If you don't include a body in the response, the browser might sub in it's own error page, but it will just communicate that the user agent made a bad request.

  • ulrischa2 hours ago
    Wo makes this with babies?
  • falcor842 hours ago
    Not to be confused with Cat as a Service - https://cataas.com/
  • cat-whisperer2 hours ago
    this is exactly what I was looking for!
  • superkuh3 hours ago
    HTTP 000: HTTP not found. HTTPS CA TLS only.

    That said, at least they have a broad cipher set support and their HTTPS-only implemetation does work in older browsers and systems. That's nice. But HTTP+HTTPS would be better.