1 pointby b800h2 hours ago4 comments
  • Peroni2 hours ago
    >it seems as though a 17-year-old in a tech role would be unable to access a corporate network if it was protected by a VPN.

    That's not what the law states. The actual law states ...by prohibiting the provision to children in the United Kingdom of VPN services which can facilitate evasion of OSA age-gating processes so a corporate network protected by a VPN doesn't fall foul of the regulation.

    >Given that children can generally work from 13

    Not in the UK they can't. Children can work part-time at 14 however they can only start full-time work once they’ve turned 16.

  • y_oh_y2 hours ago
    No. Subsection 2b gives an allowance for this:

    [Regulations under subsection (1)] must apply the child VPN prohibition to the provider of any relevant VPN service which is, or is likely to be—

    (i) offered or marketed to persons in the United Kingdom; (ii) provided to a significant number of persons;

  • speakingmoistly2 hours ago
    > Given that children can generally work from 13, which is around the time that they'll be able to use VPNs, this seems like an interesting situation.

    Just a hot take, but perhaps the focus shouldn't be "how can we ensure that nigh-preteens can connect to the office network".

    That aside, legislating on whether VPN access is legal or not is still a ridiculous and dangerous idea.

  • mytailorisrich2 hours ago
    I don't think many children work in tech... but anyway VPNs are used by any industries.

    That being said, my non-expert reading of the amendment [1] is that it only applies to "consumers", which someone using a VPN for business purposes is not:

    > “consumer” means a person acting otherwise than in the course of a business;

    > “relevant VPN service” means a service of providing, in the course of a business, to a consumer, a virtual private network for accessing the internet;

    [1] https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3909/stages/20215/amendmen...