18 pointsby myth_drannon7 hours ago2 comments
  • taylodl7 hours ago
    I thought we discovered years ago that people retain content better when reading books than when reading e-readers? Nobody could really explain why, but that's what the results showed. I know if I'm using reading to learn new things then I learn it better when reading a book. However, I also know that good videos plus a book is even better. Which is to say I think screens may augment books, but they're not going to replace them.
    • NoPicklez5 hours ago
      There could be so many reasons for this past just whether we retain more reading on a screen or a page.

      They aren't reading on e-readers, but usually laptops or tablets that have all manner of distractive apps, messaging services and notifications potentially drawing kids attention away.

      A book doesn't have a popup that your friend sent you a message, or that you got a new snapchat.

      Thats just one anecdote I can think of

  • paulpauper6 hours ago
    Then how does this gel with all these stories and anecdotes of kids cramming advanced math and AP courses for competitive schools? I would say it's the opposite. I just don't see it . From landing a decent job or getting into a decent college, everything has gotten more competitive and difficult, requiring being smarter.
    • SonOfKyuss6 hours ago
      I don't doubt your observation, since it does seem to align with what I have seen, but it is possible that the distribution has changed. As you observed, the top 25% (give or take) seem as bright and driven as ever, but if the rest of their peers are falling behind, it could drag the overall average lower.