34 pointsby riffraff8 hours ago6 comments
  • digitalPhonix8 hours ago
    Mastodon really needs a better way to share/publish long form essays (or anything not tweet sized)
    • pixelpoet7 hours ago
      I wish humanity would get over this hyper fixation on short form everything, but I fear that ship has sailed.
    • seba_dos16 hours ago
      It has, the post length limit is an artificial limit imposed by specific instance's configuration and can just be lifted.
    • PurpleRamen6 hours ago
      It should be rather simple to add an (optional?) article-view which roll's up a chain of comments from the same author, and presents it as a flat collected text. Each comment would a single paragraph, showing if there are comments from others, to this specific paragraph, which could be shown as an overlay, inline or on the side. No functionality would be lost, but it would improve readability significant. I don't understand why twitter and similar services, never made an attempt to improve their chaotic system. I mean on Twitter there are even bots doing this on external websites.
      • kalleboo5 hours ago
        Once it started becoming common to start attaching screenshots of text to Tweets (many years ago now), I wondered why they didn't think to allow add "text attachments" similar to how images and videos are attachments. You put a description of the post within the normal text limitations, and tap a thumbnail to load a long (maybe even markdown-formatted) text and read it. It keeps the feeds short both visually and in bytes.
    • quotemstr8 hours ago
      What's wrong with making a Substack?
      • mrweasel7 hours ago
        It's the same as long Twitter posts, strung together by endless tweets a few years ago. People have a platform, they use that. If you don't make it a habit to post long articles, why bother with a new platform when the one you have will suffice?

        Making a substack, or an account on Medium is "yet another thing" and many simply cannot be bothered and I don't blame them.

      • 7 hours ago
        undefined
  • amelius8 hours ago
    Basically because a modern CPU is a distributed system, which is hard to get right.
  • graemep7 hours ago
    The same problems as current software.

    1. Its horribly complex

    2. People are happy to buy buggy products.

    • sjajshha3 hours ago
      > People are happy to buy buggy products.

      Western society falls apart when we compromise on quality. This kind of behavior is much more common in 3rd world countries. One of the key differentiators in western society is how much we value trust, and “doing the bare minimum to get it done” is low trust.

      There’s more to it than that ofc, but blaming “the people” is wrong and will never fix things. Blame the people in power, the people making things, etc. The consumers don’t stand a chance.

      • graemep2 hours ago
        > This kind of behavior is much more common in 3rd world countries. One of the key differentiators in western society is how much we value trust, and “doing the bare minimum to get it done” is low trust.

        Having lived in both a developed western country and a third world one I think this is simplistic.

        As far as quality goes there were (there are fewer now) there are lots of Sri Lankan manufacturers that used to produce high quality (at least in terms of reliability and durability), and some Indian ones that were popular there too.

        As far as trust in general what you trust is different. In Britain I have more trust in being able to enforce a written contract through the courts because they are faster and more accessible (e.g. an easy not navigate small claims court, far less time to get to a judgement in most courts) but I would generally be more willing to trust an individual to keep their word in Sri Lanka (with caveats about how and in what circumstances) because reputations matter more.

    • dgan6 hours ago
      "People are abused into buying things they have no knowledge about, without consequences"
      • graemep6 hours ago
        Abused is too strong. I would say complexity means people do not understand the consequences.
  • breve6 hours ago
    It's pushing forward the state of the art. It's how we get to the Mactini and Mactini Nano:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGGOn-H7s3Q

  • jmclnx3 hours ago
    Marketing Dept plus upper management.

    A release date is set by them, developers need to cut corners to make that date. These days it is far worse then it was 40 years ago due to marketing.

  • dgan7 hours ago
    "... how they manifest and what can and can't be done about them. 1/31"

    1/31. Sure buddy closes the tab