20 pointsby robtherobber3 hours ago7 comments
  • theptip3 hours ago
    To be clear, Polanski doesn’t have authority to terminate anything, and this is a letter notifying Palantir that they will be cancelled _if the Greens win_.

    Quite misleading title in the article.

  • chrisjj3 hours ago
    Bogus clickbait title. Its claim is unsubstantiated by the article body
  • maxehmookau3 hours ago
    I'm not a fan of Palantir being involved in the NHS, but this is just political campaigning.

    Polanski is head of a political party with, currently, almost no power in the UK. This is symbolic campaigning. Which is fine, but don't be fooled in to thinking it would change anything.

  • chews3 hours ago
    TACO meets FAFO. Nice to see the Brit’s doing something about this.
    • mc323 hours ago
      As if that will stop surveillance and data collection and summonses for the hoi polloi for saying mean things about their elected officials…

      They’ll just hire someone else to do the data collection and analysis for them.

      It’d be awesome if they did actually stop their surveillance but I wouldn’t be too optimistic about it.

  • crimsoneer3 hours ago
    Presumably he'll have one of these to Google, Microsoft and AWS anytime now. Oh wait, no, because that won't get him the clickbaity headlines he actually wants rather than actually trying to improve the NHS.
  • spants2 hours ago
    [flagged]
  • gadders3 hours ago
    [flagged]
    • 3 hours ago
      undefined
    • drcongo3 hours ago
      No he didn't.
      • crimsoneer3 hours ago
        He's apologised for it publicly, so, you know.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zack_Polanski

        • James_K3 hours ago
          > Polanski also worked as a hypnotherapist. In 2013, a journalist for The Sun requested a hypnotherapy session from him to increase her breast size and body image self-confidence for an article in the paper. Polanski featured in the published article, in which the journalist claimed that her breast size had increased. Polanski has apologised for his involvement, saying that the idea came from the client, that he did not charge for the session, that the therapy was meant to help with bodily self-image rather than physical enlargement, and that the article did not accurately reflect the situation.

          You really just have to read this to see that what you're saying is inaccurate.