10 pointsby e145bc455f16 hours ago2 comments
  • goku124 hours ago
    Why does this misleading article from more than a year ago get posted repeatedly?

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46510073

    This submission doesn't mention the publish time either, and it uses the link that hides a bunch of replies that debunk the article.

  • sgt6 hours ago
    Might it see a popularity burst though, due to Rust's inherent advantage in AI augmented development? Being more deterministic makes it easier for LLM's to produce working code in it.
    • eimrine5 hours ago
      There is not such an advancement, Rust is made for dealing with human's mistakes. Chatbots can stop having such a mistakes and generate more terse formal specs instead.
      • wookmaster5 hours ago
        Aren’t they trained on human code?
        • eimrine5 hours ago
          What am I supposed to say, they were trained on Martians' code?

          Do I need to agreed with your statement that chatbot will never be able to write a correct C code without stupid runtime boundaries?

          • goku124 hours ago
            The question by @wookmaster isn't just valid, if we're to follow your argument, chatbots may as well skip C and write directly in assembly or machine code for maximum efficiency! You seem to put too much faith in chatbots that you forget that correcting AI mistakes in code is a major job now. Even the best coders use AI to only fill in obvious code, not to think on their behalf.
            • eimrine3 hours ago
              I have opinion that you do not understand the importance of C after reading your claim about so-called efficiency in systems programming code. You have got so carried away with defending the stupid untestable run-time checks, enough to ignore things like ABI, cross-platformness, developed datatype system and compiler optimizations with respect to hardware quirks such as cachelines.

              What you have called a major job did not even remotely exist 4 years ago, it is laughable if to remind the Lindy effect.