In my experience, the value doesn’t really shift from “coding” to “architecture” — it shifts toward understanding constraints.

On platforms like macOS, a lot of architectural decisions aren’t about clean abstractions but about what the system actually allows you to do (WindowServer rules, accessibility APIs, focus behavior, sandboxing). LLMs can generate plausible code, but they don’t feel where the platform pushes back.

The hard part is still knowing which designs will collapse once they meet real OS behavior, not writing the glue code itself.

You should be doing architecture regardless of LLMs.

So should our programming languages shift to express architecture?

https://objective.st/

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3689492.3690052

> generate repetitive code

Neither LLMs nor people should be doing that.

It does make sense to shift focus on Architecture, but you also need people who are able accept that design. It takes a lot of people to agree on something in an enterprise context.