5 pointsby wtcactus23 days ago5 comments
  • Juliate23 days ago
    "Tensions surround the effort." You don't say. We don't even know what the world will look like in 3 months.
  • damnitbuilds23 days ago
    The crucial missing thing is in-space refueling. Spacex will start testing on the ground within weeks.

    I think it is reasonable to believe that - if there are no blockers uncovered, just steady development and testing - they could be testing it in space by mid-year and have it working by year-end.

    Then - as long as fuel storage in space works - I do not know of any other major impediments to launching an unmanned Starship mission to Mars.

    Sticking the reentry and landing will be hard, but Starships seem to handle tough reentries well, and Starships have already landed on legs on Earth.

    I am a pessimist on a manned Starship landing on the Moon within three years, let alone on Mars.

    • Zigurd23 days ago
      There are many milestones to go before in orbit refueling is possible, among them : 1. What efficiency are you expecting without ground-based fuel chilling? 2. Have you solved for lack of gravity? Your fuel is sloshing around weightless. 3. The necessary tempo of refueling flights hasn't been reached with test flights, and is far greater than the maximum tempo reached by Falcon 9, impressive though it is.

      These are just the big ones I can think of off the top of my head. Digging into the way that fuel tanks are prevented from crumpling while they rapidly empty of liquid methane probably reveals that that becomes much more complicated in micro gravity in orbit with multiple refueling connections to tanker flights. There are dozens of gotchas like that, and I don't think "they must've already planned for that" is an assumption supported by historical performance.

      • damnitbuilds21 days ago
        Spacex would be stupid not to have done studies into all those things, as much as is possible on the ground.

        Spacex are not stupid.

        • Zigurd21 days ago
          If by studies you mean renders, then yeah. Just like the lunar lander.
          • damnitbuilds19 days ago
            You appear to have inside knowledge of Spacex's research work.

            Or you are making shit up.

            Sagan leads us to the latter.

  • Bender23 days ago
    I always assumed their big ship is for putting weapons in space. Are they actually funded for building colonies on Mars? What percentage of the population are resilient, physically fit, highly intelligent and mentally stable enough to endure such a harsh environment? AFAIK most of the experiments in bio-domes located in deserts simulating Mars on earth had failed miserably.
  • __patchbit__23 days ago
    SpaceX to the surprise of everyone may perform the Mars sample return.
    • 22 days ago
      undefined
  • stevenalowe23 days ago
    That is great news if they going to leave Musk there