52 pointsby 7777777phil24 days ago4 comments
  • fnoef24 days ago
    Isn’t it ironic that it’s posted on medium?
    • sudahtigabulan23 days ago
      It looks this way at first glance, but at the end of the article is a link to the original:

      > If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

      > https://pluralistic.net/2026/01/14/sole-and-despotic/#world-...

      This is a case of Publish on your Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere - https://indieweb.org/POSSE

    • treetalker24 days ago
      I don't know, I

      ******* SUBSCRIBE TO TREETALKER'S COMMENTS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! *******

      sometimes like reading things

      ******* SUBSCRIBERS ENJOY AN AD-FREE EXPERIENCE *******

      on Medium and Substack.

      ******* INTERESTED IN MORE TREETALKER CONTENT? *******

    • 24 days ago
      undefined
    • 23 days ago
      undefined
  • pjmlp24 days ago
    I still do.
  • FrankWilhoit24 days ago
    Don't do nostalgia. Ownership is a good thing. Say why. Don't do nostalgia.
    • roxolotl24 days ago
      He’s pretty clear in the fourth paragraph about one major issue. It only goes on more from there.

      > Under Section 1201 of the DMCA, it's a felony to modify your own property in ways that the manufacturer disapproves of, even if your modifications accomplish some totally innocuous, legal, and socially beneficial goal. Not a little felony, either: DMCA 1201 provides for a five year sentence and a $500,000 fine for a first offense.

    • bobson38124 days ago
      Nostalgia is the only remaining product tho
      • FrankWilhoit24 days ago
        Yes! But it's not one of ours, it's one of theirs.
      • m46324 days ago
        though it isn't what it used to be.
        • tanseydavid23 days ago
          I know--ever since they changed to a subscription model.