188 pointsby thinkingemote8 hours ago32 comments
  • sefrost6 hours ago
    Wow a fantastic independent pub near where I used to live in London is seeing its rateable value go up 480%! This website really puts the headlines in to a nice local perspective.

    It seems like the taxes only go up while the services get worse in the UK, although I’ve been away for 5 years now so maybe things improved.

    • tialaramex2 hours ago
      > seeing its rateable value go up 480%!

      Rateable value is based on what the market prices would be to rent that space. So, somebody is doing nicely apparently.

      • sefrost25 minutes ago
        But if the landlord owns the pub (rare in the UK I know), but I believe it’s the case in this instance, then what are they getting from unrealised property price gains?
    • brightbeige4 hours ago
      Here’s the Lamb and Flag in Oxford

      https://www.ismypubfucked.com/pub/11447801200

      > the Inklings, a literary group including J. R. R. Tolkien and C. S. Lewis, started meeting at The Lamb and Flag.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamb_%26_Flag,_Oxford

    • moop_moop4 hours ago
      The services have certainly not got better in the last 5 years. This Government is fiscally illiterate and has hit the top of the Laffer curve and is now trying to go down the other side.
      • LightBug1an hour ago
        "This" ...?

        You jest.

        • HPsquaredan hour ago
          Meet the new government, same as the old government.
      • fakedang4 hours ago
        Unfortunately, if an election were to be held today, the morons at Reform would have the greatest chance of winning, thanks to Starmer's ostrich syndrome, Corbyn dividing the Labour vote and the Tories being absolutely irrelevant after 15 years of continuous rule.
    • iNerdier4 hours ago
      Amateurs. One close to me is at an +821% increase in its tax bill and rateable value at 613%.
  • philo23an hour ago
    Kinda meta, but this is the first time in a long time where I've put only the first half of my postcode in expecting it not to work and been surprised. Most of these "find your nearest XYZ" site require the full postcode which is just unnecessary unless you're looking for a fairly precise location. A full postcode can narrow your location down to an individual street, so its nice not to give too much away if you can.

    For anyone not in the know, UK postcodes are made up of two parts: a general area (the outward code) and then a more specific one (the inward code.) Generally speaking a postcode + house number will be good enough to get a letter delivered to the right place, though the sorting office might not be too happy with you...

    The format [0] is roughly: AB12 3CD, though the number of letters/numbers on the left side can vary a bit. As far as I know the second set of numbers is always 1 digit though, so that's how you can easily split the two sides of it to format it nicely. There's a couple of special ones that break the rules though.

    [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postcodes_in_the_United_Kingdo...

    • alexpotato31 minutes ago
      I lived in SW1 many years ago and was surprised to learn, from this website, that SW goes all the way out to SW19!
  • fourside7 hours ago
    For anyone else who entered a US zip code and was confused by the ‘invalid zip code’ error: this is UK only.
    • notatoad6 hours ago
      your first clue might have been that it does not say "zip code" in either the field label or the error message, it says "postcode".
      • jtbakeran hour ago
        I think of postal code as a generic, international form of the concept, not tied to a location.
      • badc0ffee6 hours ago
        Australia and NZ have postcodes, too.

        If they had made this a .co.uk rather than a .com, there would be no confusion.

      • fourside4 hours ago
        The site has since changed the content from when I made the comment. It used to say zip code in the label and error.
      • SoftTalker6 hours ago
        Or the term "pub." In the US it's much more usual to say "bar." Maybe "tavern" but that sounds rather dated to my ear.
        • Thews5 hours ago
          When I lived in the PNW people used the word pub more than bar.
          • toasterlovin4 hours ago
            My sense is that it is an affectation meant to indicate an aspiration to something more than a bar (and its coarse patrons).
          • selectodude5 hours ago
            That’s because everybody up there thinks that liking soccer makes them English.
        • tshaddox5 hours ago
          "Bar" is certainly the catch-all term in the U.S., but "pub" is also very widely understood to refer to a specific type of bar, especially (but not limited to) bars deliberately styled as Irish or British pubs.
          • tracker14 hours ago
            Along a similar note, I hate when a Bar is labelled as a "Pub" and doesn't serve food. IMO, in the US, if it's labelled a "pub" it should serve food.
            • wat100003 hours ago
              Come to Virginia, where it's outright illegal for any establishment serving alcohol to not also serve food (and not only must food be served, it must account for at least 45% of revenue).
              • badc0ffee2 hours ago
                Do they make you order food with every round of drinks? I remember hearing about places like that from my dad, and it seems it would have worked better in the era of cheap drinks/low built-in alcohol taxes.
                • dustincoatesan hour ago
                  I went to college in a county that only allowed alcohol sales with food for clubs (think: country clubs). So, of course, the restaurant that I worked for created its own club. You simply filled out your name (and maybe phone number, I don't remember) on a piece of paper when you ordered your drink.
                • prmoustache42 minutes ago
                  They easy way would be to do like in some parts of Spain, for every drink you receive a tapa.

                  That way it can be considered that the food is part of the price of the drink.

              • tracker12 hours ago
                I'm nut sure I'd go that far... it's just I expect a "Pub" to include pub food.
          • dylan6044 hours ago
            every now and then you'll find a public house or similarly named
        • 9rx5 hours ago
          "Pub" is a fairly common term throughout the world. But "pub that needs you" made it pretty obvious that it was about pubs in England.
          • thebruce87m3 hours ago
            Did it? I put my postcode in and got nothing. It took browsing the map to discover it had no results for Scotland at all.
            • 9rx3 hours ago
              Yes. Being on the other side of the world, I've only ever heard of efforts to save English pubs. Thus, without more details, one knows that is what is being referred to. Perhaps Scotland has the same kind of movement happening at the local level, but something on a global website implies global context.
              • thebruce87m2 hours ago
                The website is for England and Wales.
      • MisterTea6 hours ago
        I doubt most people would bother to think about that detail.
    • rcbdev3 hours ago
      Silly me, I entered an Austrian zip code out of principle. Did not expect it to work, though, of course.
    • amouat5 hours ago
      Seems to be England only. No results for Edinburgh.
      • eterm5 hours ago
        Business rates are a devolved matter, Scotland set their own rates.
      • iso16314 hours ago
        I see results on both sides of the border here, Wales and England.
    • xrownow6 hours ago
      Any plans to release the code? Would be nice to allow others to do something similar for their local pubs.
    • imzadi7 hours ago
      Yeah, they could reduce confusion by changing "the government" to "the UK government."
      • Tom13806 hours ago
        If Americans did the same it would be great
        • deelayman6 hours ago
          This is also a problem that exists within countries. My RSS feed is littered with Canadian independent (national) news agencies not defining what municipality article headlines relate to. E.g. "Mayor pushes back against province on xyz issue". Okay, that might be huge news for Timmins Ontario , but maybe BAU for Toronto. Even skimming the lead paragraph doesn't define the city often.

          *Editting with a point: Perhaps everyone assumes a local audience.

        • pierrec6 hours ago
          Americans, hm? I see what you did there.
        • RIMR6 hours ago
          Good luck. Americans won't even differentiate Washington State and Washington D.C. Even the AP guidelines say that "Washington" is ubiquitous shorthand for "Washington D.C." and recommends against shortening it to "D.C."
  • anfractuosity5 hours ago
    Great idea!

    https://www.mirror.co.uk/money/personal-finance/finance-expe... shows how little pubs make per pint, very sad.

    If anyone's curious about cask beer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ud_eTwY4nc&list=PLyDTS7ZG3z... is a very interesting youtube video series by The Craft Beer Channel.

    • hermitcrab5 hours ago
      My grandparents were publicans 70+ years ago. Even they they made very little on beer. All the profit was spirits and software drinks. Probably food as well now.
      • RobotToaster4 hours ago
        > software drinks

        I knew java was good for something

        • hermitcrab4 hours ago
          Must have been muscle memory.
      • 9rx5 hours ago
        > All the profit was spirits and software drinks.

        What are the margins on a Codeacola?

      • cyberpunk5 hours ago
        15 quid for a 25ml of whisky is ridiculous however.
  • crazygringo5 hours ago
    Would be much more helpful if it indicated literally anywhere on the homepage that this was specific to the UK.

    Being a .com as opposed to a .co.uk, you can't even tell from the domain.

    • bodge50002 hours ago
      There are plenty of US sites that make no mention of being US specific, I feel like this is well deserved
      • crazygringo33 minutes ago
        Due to the history of the internet, anything ".com" should be assumed to be US-specific if not obviously global, just like anything ".co.uk" should be assumed to be UK-specific if not obviously global.

        If you use a .com for something that is specific to a country/region that is not the US, the onus is on you to clarify. That's the problem here. If you're not going to make it ".uk", then you should be making that obvious on the homepage.

      • skinnymuchan hour ago
        The US is the center of the world though. There are privileges to that like assuming the world revolves around you.
        • noir_lordan hour ago
          For now at least, empires fall, so do superpowers.

          There is a reason the prime meridian goes through Greenwich and it isn’t because we asked nicely.

    • alexfoo19 minutes ago
      I think it's as simple as the fact that for a throwaway site it's considerably cheaper to get a .com domain than it is a domain that ends in .uk
      • crazygringo12 minutes ago
        Sure. So then just add a couple of extra words to the homepage to make it clear? It's not that hard, and saves visitors a lot of time from hunting around trying to figure it out.
    • zxcvasd4 hours ago
      [dead]
    • sva_5 hours ago
      Like the big red letters in the title that say "IN BRITAIN"?
  • rconti7 hours ago
    Interest in context on "government pub rates". New tax scheme?
    • amiga3866 hours ago
      Existing tax. Proposed new calculation for the "value" of business property, disproportionately affecting pubs.

      https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8e57dexly1o

      > In her November Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves scaled back business rate discounts that have been in force since the pandemic from 75% to 40% - and announced that there would be no discount at all from April. That, combined with big upward adjustments to rateable values of pub premises, left landlords with the prospect of much higher rates bills.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business_rates_in_England

      > Properties are assessed in a rating list with a rateable value, a valuation of their annual rental value on a fixed valuation date using assumptions fixed by statute. Rating lists are created and maintained by the Valuation Office Agency, a UK government executive agency.

      • rconti3 hours ago
        Ah, interesting. So it sounds like the tax roughly scales with property value (or size). And pubs are probably a "poor use of land" because the revenue per square foot is not particularly high?
        • amiga3862 hours ago
          Yes. It scales with a government agency's estimate of the property's annual rent (even if you own it), based on market rates in the area over the past two years, which they then scale up/down based on floorspace and how dilapidated the building is.

          You pay a percentage of the hypothetical rent as tax. There is a lower rate if you're a small business, and there are also tax reliefs for various reasons (charity, partial building occupation, etc.)

          But pubs have been in trouble for quite some time: https://www.morningadvertiser.co.uk/Article/2025/05/27/numbe...

          Pubs have high costs, small margins and customers are extremely price-sensitive. What pubs are generally asking for is more types of relief, because what we tend to see is pubs close, people in the area become more isolated, and the building remains empty for years thereafter. [] Pubs appreciated the post-COVID relief, but tax rates are about to shoot up.

          [] fun fact: if the building is vacant, its landlord must pay rates as if it's 100% occupied. Hence this brazen scheme where a man puts a snail farm in every room so you can pay the rates of an agricultural enterprise: https://www.theguardian.com/news/ng-interactive/2025/dec/04/...

    • flir6 hours ago
      Pubs are dying. Have been for years.

      Many deaths were postponed because their taxes were reduced due to Covid. Those taxes are now returning to normal levels. This will result in a glut of deaths, as pubs that were just hanging on go under.

      The policy question is, basically, do we want to subsidize pubs because they're part of our national culture, even though we don't use them nearly as much as we used to?

      • kristianc6 hours ago
        "Does Britain really need?" has been responsible for the gutting of so much of what used to make Britain a nice place to live over the last 20 years. You can say she same about public libraries, local bus routes, civic architecture, arts funding, youth services, maintenance budgets. The damage has been incalculable.
        • flir3 hours ago
          You won't find any argument from me on all those other things.

          But pubs are a weird place to draw the line.

          • kristianc2 hours ago
            Every one of them individually seems like a weird place to draw the line. Social fabric and the ties that bond matter.
      • jaccola5 hours ago
        The government has decided that they know what’s good for you better for you than you do. So they tax alcohol at incredibly high rates.

        Without this more pubs could exist. So I don’t think it’s a case of subsidising as much as removing the disincentive.

        • yunohn5 hours ago
          I’m not familiar with the UK, but is the tax on alcohol at pubs higher than at a store? My general understanding was that people have just shopped visiting pubs for other reasons - like diluted drinks, crappy food, loud music, etc.
          • t-34 hours ago
            Bars and pubs aren't really competing against the store or restaurants, they're competing against you drinking alone or with only close friends. If stepping in to have a beer and shoot the shit would cost a significant chunk of a day's wages, you just won't do it, but if I can buy more beer with an hours wages than I can drink in an hour, it's not a bad time.
            • iso16314 hours ago
              Weatherspoons charge under £3 for a pint in town. That's 15 minutes at minimum wage.

              Beer was far more expensive 25 years ago - £1.60 in 2000 in the student pub when I first started buying my own beer, that was about half an hour at minimum wage.

              On the cost side: Wages are higher, energy costs more, rent is higher (because if the pub can't operate the owner can get planning permission to convert it to a private dwelling and sell it for £600k rather than making £12k a year in rent)

              On the demand side: People are healthier and drink less. It's nowhere near as acceptable to go out for a few pints at lunch time. People can't drive to a rural pub.

              • messe3 hours ago
                > Weatherspoons charge under £3 for a pint in town. That's 15 minutes at minimum wage.

                Yeah but then you've to drink at spoons.

              • bodge50002 hours ago
                That is spoons though, most pubs are 3-4x that
                • HPsquaredan hour ago
                  Maybe spoons is killing all the pubs.
      • christkv5 hours ago
        Lower taxes is not subsidising a business.
        • hermanzegerman4 hours ago
          It is, when it gets a favourable treatment over other businesses
    • cjs_ac6 hours ago
      Changes to property taxes on business premises.
    • RobinL6 hours ago
      > In her November Budget, Chancellor Rachel Reeves scaled back business rate discounts that have been in force since the pandemic from 75% to 40% - and announced that there would be no discount at all from April.

      That, combined with big upward adjustments to rateable values of pub premises, left landlords with the prospect of much higher rates bills.

  • hunglee26 hours ago
    brilliant website which manages to convey classic British humour on a classically British topic. Also shines much needed light on the very serious challenges independent British Pubs are undergoing - these are essential social institutions, social coherence is damaged every time one of these shut down.
  • fauria6 hours ago
    Find an English pub that needs you.
    • graemep6 hours ago
      Not true, it also covers pubs in Wales
    • QuercusMax6 hours ago
      Yeah, I have NO clue what this site is even about.
      • 9JollyOtter6 hours ago
        It is a "use it or lose it" style campaign by the looks of it.

        Lots of Pubs in the UK are closing down in recent years. Pubs have traditionally been a big part of socialising in the UK. I don't drink anymore so I don't bother unless I am having a pub lunch on a Friday.

        • prmoustache31 minutes ago
          Can't you drink non-alcoholic beverage? If the point is socialising, alcohol is not a requirement.

          I know a lot of bars in my area also are places to play board games nowadays.

  • NooneAtAll33 hours ago
    Kinda wish there was some way to quickly scroll through the pages... Also data seems to be different when ordered by different values?

    When ordered by RV£ there are 43703 entries with data. Most negative RV£ change is -£137,500 for 33 Main Road

    When ordered by RV% there are 43303 entries with data. Most negative RV% change is -87.0% for PAVILLION HOTEL

  • wummsan hour ago
    Title could use (in Britain)
  • j45an hour ago
    It's important to separate the spirit of this from the spirits of it.

    Pubs as social gathering places are critical to exist and keep alive.

    Drinking neurotoxins that have a lot of destruction and damage, maybe not so much.

    In the UK pubs are extremely different as well than the US. This site is for the UK, since it's asking for a postal code, among other signs. The UK also I believe has last call at 11 PM, which helps fuel the binge drinking before 11 PM and the wild public afterwards. In North America, last call for alcohol can be 1-3 AM, and people generally aren't in a rush to fuel up to blast off.

    • antonymoose34 minutes ago
      Funny enough I worked with an old timer back in Charleston, SC which historically had no regulated last call. During his drinking years they passed a law requiring an 0200 closing time which, as he put it, was a terrible idea because it put all the drunks out on the street at the same time causing joint chaos. In his view having no official close meant folks naturally filtered out over time as they were sated. Seems any hard stop causes trouble?
  • tracker14 hours ago
    While this is cool to see, would be nice to see some indication of the nation specific context for those outside that nation... especially since it's the more generic .com tld instead of say .uk ...

    Maybe even a Union Jack in the corner as a background image, or something.

  • jihadjihad7 hours ago
    I like how the status values could be used as labels of economic wellbeing for people, too:

      Somehow Fine
      Feeling It
      Struggling
      Fucked
      Absolutely Fucked
    • stonegray5 hours ago
      Stealing this for error logging levels
      • cyberpunk5 hours ago
        The bristol stool scale also works well. Although that’s better for sprint planning maybe..
        • grumblepeet4 hours ago
          I live in south Bristol where the “Bristol stool scale” and the “pubs that need your help” overlap distressingly.
        • dylan6044 hours ago
          so...you got me. thinking it might have something to do with out worn the stools in your pub are. nope it's just, you know, stool.
      • jihadjihad5 hours ago
        s/Somehow/Possibly/g haha but I like that idea!
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • tmp104232884425 hours ago
    Broken - getting `ERR_SSL_PROTOCOL_ERROR` when trying to open it in Chrome
  • wat100006 hours ago
    People really struggle when given a link to a web site that isn't for them, huh.
    • quititan hour ago
      https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBRtbdVquWF/

      Neither American nor from the UK, but I knew what this was about because it's possible to go online and seek out information. Neat.

      What I didn't do was become some entitled see you next tuesday and complain that a .com should be reserved for the american audience and the site should use a .co.uk – As if american businesses don't utilise foreign TLDs to create cutesy URLs. Maybe now is a good time to note that the fashionable .AI TLD belongs to Anguilla, a British territory.

    • crazygringo4 hours ago
      No. It's when the web site doesn't say who it's for at all, that's when everybody struggles. And understandably so.
      • ikr678an hour ago
        Except that as a english speaking non american, this happens literally all the time with ecommerce?

        It's not until I get to checkout I realise they do not ship to my country or want to deal with me.

        • crazygringo39 minutes ago
          International shipping is an entirely different subject. You can assume that .com is American unless otherwise indicated, and that you'll need to check shipping policies. Just like as an American, when I go to a .co.uk ecommerce site, I have to check whether they ship to the US.
          • prmoustache29 minutes ago
            > You can assume that .com is American unless otherwise

            Why?

            • crazygringo19 minutes ago
              Because the internet was invented in America so it's the only country where a country suffix was never used from the start of its popularity.

              I'm not saying this is good or bad or justified or not, just saying what the conventions are.

      • wat100003 hours ago
        People only struggle because of a self-centered view that everything is supposed to be for them, and things that aren't for them are a weird exception. A reasonable person will realize that the fact that they don't understand any of what it's talking about means they're not the target audience, and move on (or poke around out of curiosity).
        • crazygringo35 minutes ago
          It's self-centered to want to communicate well?

          It's just basic communications skills, and honestly decency, to describe what a thing is and who it's for.

          Maybe someone who isn't the target audience still wants to learn about the thing? Which this site provides no way of doing. That's the problem. Why choose to be inaccessible like that, when it's so easy to add a couple of works and links?

          > or poke around out of curiosity

          You mean like by following links that are supplied? Because that's my complaint: there are no links.

          • prmoustache25 minutes ago
            > it's self-centered to want to communicate well? > > It's just basic communications skills, and honestly decency, to describe what a thing is and who it's for

            What is the main country where dying pubs is such a big subject?

            For f**ks sake I am not from UK yet it is easy to understand what it is all about from context and language. And I wasn't even aware of that tax change.

            Pure US arrogance.

            • crazygringo16 minutes ago
              > What is the main country where dying pubs is such a big subject?

              How should I know? That's the point. It might as easily be Ireland for all I know. Or maybe pubs are dying in Boston or something?

              > For f*ks sake I am not from UK yet it is easy to understand what it is all about from context and language.

              I'm happy you're so smart. Not all of us are so lucky, I guess.

              > Pure US arrogance.

              Who said anything about the US? You know there are people from a lot of other countries who speak English too? If your concern is arrogance, it seems like it's your own that perhaps needs to be dialed back a little.

              Suggesting that communication can be clearer isn't a form of arrogance. To the contrary, it's something that comes out of empathy, identifying how communication could help more readers/listeners.

    • 5 hours ago
      undefined
  • 4 hours ago
    undefined
  • celluan hour ago
    I mean alcohol is the worst drug: it’s highly addictive, toxic to the body, one of the few drugs with potentially fatal withdrawal, and a major driver of violence, accidents, and family breakdown. Unlike most drugs, it seriously harms people beyond the user — and because it’s legal, cheap, and socially normalised, its damage happens on a massive scale.

    Sooooo yes happy with pubs closures.

    • georgebcrawfordan hour ago
      I agree until your last sentence. Pubs closing can be devastating.

      Pubs are often the centre of a community, especially small ones. Not even small towns. Traditionally they have been centered around drinking, but this is changing. Much like libraries had to adapt to falling reading rates, pubs have had to adapt to falling alcohol consumption.

      The hard part of this is that food and wage costs are often covered by alcohol costs, though where I'm from the government has exercised vice taxes to make this less tenable. More customers doesn't necessarily mean that much more profit, for a host of reasons.

      I hope pubs find a way forward.

      Source for my rambling: worked in and managed pubs for a decade. They're not just for heavy drinkers.

  • sleepybrett3 hours ago
    For a dumb american, what is a 'pub rate'?
  • jdlyga4 hours ago
    UK only
    • leapingdog3 hours ago
      England & Wales only. The website is a response to new business rates (taxes) arriving this year.

      Scotland, Northern Ireland & the rest of the world play by different rules.

  • iso16314 hours ago
    Nearest pub

    2023 Rateable Value £13,800

    2026 Rateable Value £12,250

    Change -£3,300(-23.9%)

    I guess "no" would be the answer then.

    Nearest town has 3 pubs where rates are going down significantly and 4 where they're going up. I wonder why, is it that the previous setup was unfair to those who are seeing their rates going down?

    The pub I do go to each week is seeing rates going up +£3,300. That's not as big an impact from yet another inflation busting minimum wage increase.

    However the much bigger concern is that people will be scared to drive there. Currently you can drive there, have a pint, and then go home, and be confident you're not triggering the limit. They're reducing this limit, which means no more trip to the pub.

    I'm sure it's fine in big cities where people live in walking distance.

  • lenerdenator6 hours ago
    This might be the single most British website on the internet.

    I wonder if there's an equivalent use case in the US.

  • numbers5 hours ago
    what is a "rateable value" here?
    • adw4 hours ago
      Property tax valuation.
  • bodge50002 hours ago
    somehow my local, which is pretty dodgy, is doing fine. I need to driving distance to find one thats fucked, and Im not even in a well funded area
  • edent6 hours ago
    The one near me which is absolutely fucked, as far as I'm concerned, deserves it.

    Fighty customers, crap beer, odd opening hours, and half their food menu is off ("sorry mate, we've got no cheese"). Oh, and now their credit card terminal prompts customers for a tip!

    I love a good pub, but most are crap.

    • twic2 hours ago
      Near me, the (nice but always too busy) Old Dairy is getting a cut, and the (mediocre Arsenal fan packed) Bank of Friendship and Arsenal Tavern are getting obliterated. God exists, and he supports Spurs!
  • ajb6 hours ago
    Just getting a totally black map with anonymous coloured dots on both chrome and Firefox. The pub may or may not be fucked, but the website is.

    (Yes I tried disabling all the dark settings, no difference)

  • sobiolite5 hours ago
    The nearest "absolutely fucked" pub to me hasn't existed since 2008. I'd say they have bigger problems than a rates increase.
    • bspammer5 hours ago
      They do acknowledge this on the site

      > Based on VOA data (Nov 2025) which is often inaccurate. Many pubs have also closed since then.

  • DiabloD34 hours ago
    Man, it's weird being an American sometimes.

    I do not drink. I am half Irish and half German.

    Drinking is a _very_ weird cultural artifact from our past. It doesn't improve your life, it has been scientifically proven to not 'help you relax', and there may in fact be no safe amount of alcohol to drink; all the pop-sci headlines that say 'one glass of wine a week may improve your health' are really about studies that put the safe max at one glass per week.

    From what I can tell, the UK is no longer subsidizing what is effectively a criminal enterprise that is centuries old.

    • danielfoster4 hours ago
      With all due respect this opinion verges on neo prohibitionist alarmism. The social benefits of alcohol have been widely acknowledged and at a time when we are all spending too much time at home on our phones (arguably worse for health than a pint), communities need more social spaces. That place may not necessarily be a bar and it’s perfectly fine if you don’t wish to drink, but it’s a bit much to refer to a cultural product as a criminal enterprise.
      • DiabloD34 hours ago
        Many people have written what you have written, trying to justify their life choices to strangers on the internet.

        None of them have ever explained why alcohol, or any drug use, needs to be part of third spaces.

        Society is losing third spaces, largely due to unchecked capitalism eroding the society it serves... but 'pubs' are just another form of rent-seeking by landlords. It has been proven without a doubt that third spaces as a commercial venture is ultimately non-functional, yet that is what pubs and bars have always been, and now they are dying out.

        • danielfoster3 hours ago
          Again, with all due respect, I’m not seeing how my comment is pushing a “life choice” on anyone, and the movement to restrict alcohol consumption equally qualifies as pushing a life choice on someone.

          Commercial pubs have existed for hundreds of year. But drinking doesn’t have to be commercial. In Berlin where I live there’s a non-profit hacker space that has a bar with at-cost drinks. It’s also perfectly legal to buy a beer and sit in the park. And of course, nothing is better than having friends over for a wine tasting.

        • volkl482 hours ago
          The book "Drunk: How We Sipped, Danced, and Stumbled Our Way to Civilization" would be a good read for you, should you wish to consider alternative viewpoints.

          --------

          Distilling what I remember about an entire book I read a couple years ago into a HN comment is difficult, but one of the more salient notes from it is this: Adult humans are naturally suspicious of others and slow to trust, particularly those they have no existing points of connection to. In contrast - children have much lower inhibitions in this sense and are much better at this.

          Alcohol, in moderation, is one of the most effective tools in humanity's arsenal to more easily socialize with and create trust with total strangers.

          The "reduction of inhibitions" we are all aware of in terms of being a risk of making negative choices, also serves to greatly reduce inhibition of the average adult to new interactions and experiences.

          It is difficult to achieve this result in adults otherwise, especially in terms of a single activity with low investment required in time, money, facilities, and commitment.

          --------

          It is likely that as we transitioned from a society where adult encounters with total strangers were rare (tribal/village) to common (urban) that alcohol played a pretty significant role in creating the social cohesion for it.

          It is not at all clear that we have found some successful alternative to this, and we may well find that even with all the documented downsides of it, we're worse off as a society for moving away from it.

          -----

          Again, this is my recollection of a book I read a couple years back - don't take this word for word. I will also note that it's not all rosy and has some thoughts on the types of consumption we should probably discourage as well and the general risk/reward of alcohol in society.

        • 9rx3 hours ago
          > None of them have ever explained why alcohol, or any drug use, needs to be part of third spaces.

          Third places need to have some kind of draw, else nobody will show up. "If you build it, they will come" is for the movies. In the real world you need to have a compelling reason to have others come in your door. Space alone is not sufficient to establish a third space.

          That draw doesn't necessarily have to be alcohol (or another drug), but it was the thing that many people used to want. Threatening use of a third space by fear of the wrath of a mighty deity only buys you one day out of the week, I'm afraid.

          You're quite right that people no longer want alcohol like they used to. Why nurse a hangover when you can get the same dopamine rush scrolling through TikTok at home from the comfort of your couch? This means that many third spaces of yesteryear no longer serve a purpose, and as you call out, have closed as a result.

          Which is all well and good, I guess, but some segment of the population still wish that there were third spaces for them to exist in. Trouble is that they've never been able to find anything as compelling as alcohol used to be across large swaths of the population, making a different kind of third space of the same scale a complete no-go. Trying to salvage the remaining alcohol-centric third places is the only path they can see to try and relive that glory.

          Of course there are plenty of alcohol-free (or at least not alcohol focused) third spaces that revolve around niche interests, but these are generally not seen as a good fit for those who don't have that particular niche interest. Alcohol was historically so successful as the foundation for a third space because, once upon a time, nearly everyone was interested in it, bringing everyone in the door.

    • xhevahir4 hours ago
      What's especially American about this remark isn't the experience of consuming alcohol in public. What is characteristically American, I think, is the assumption that we can pronounce a thing good or bad merely on the basis of its effect on the individual, with no regard for one's relationships with other people. Drinking in a pub is a social activity, and the alcohol is a lubricant for that activity. Yes, doing too much of it can cause great harm; doing any amount of it could cause some harm; it does not follow that the thing is a net detriment to society, and that it should be banned.
      • DiabloD34 hours ago
        Maybe it is that way for people in the UK, or maybe people of a certain age group.

        However, I am, as I said, an American, but also a Millennial. For many Millennials, drinking isn't a social activity, it is a form of quiet shame. We saw our parents and aunts and uncles and grandparents destroy their lives because of alcoholism, we lost friends and family because of being victims of drunk drivers, we saw people die of complications of a lifetime of drinking.

        A lot of us simply chose not to repeat those mistakes as those mistakes effect the people around us in grave ways.

        If anything, drinking is an anti-social activity, even if you do it entirely socially.

        I just don't see the point in keeping it around.

    • ivvve4 hours ago
      It sounds like you don't understand what a pub is like.

      Whilst this is definitely not what's it's like, this quaint video is all about the lineage of the pub in the UK, and explains the third-spaceness of them, which I'd argue still exists[1].

      Pubs are so important for our communities in the UK, whether that's watching the game, seeing a friend's band, celebrating a birthday or just catching up after work.

      Many of the parts of my life have been lived in a pub. If it's criminal, I'd happily be locked up. Or maybe lock me in, a sadly rarer occurrence these days.

      [1] https://youtu.be/_GCcoaSq3x4?si=QunsiKqk4D4IRV0M

      • sleepybrett3 hours ago
        Exactly, designing a 'third place' that isn't alcohol focused seems to be a tough nut to crack. Alcohol greases the wheels for socialization and is a highly profitable item for a place to sell that keeps the lights on (people may have several drinks an hour, drinking leads to more drinking both in the long and shot terms, etc). Meanwhile a typical coffeeshop here in seattle is, aside from the espresso machines, is a near silent library-like space. Many people heads down in a book or a laptop. Instead of having a few drinks per hour you instead may have a single coffee and maybe a pastry or sandwich.

        If someone opened a social space with maybe a kitchen that let you pay by the hour to hang out, credit for kitchen orders. All the other bar/pub accoutrements gaming (darts, pool, shuffleboard, pinball, whatnot), sports on the tv, whatever .. I still don't think people will go for it.

        I think the only non-boozy option that comes to mind is the small town diner but those are thin on the ground.

    • sleepybrett3 hours ago
      Here is what I will say. Drinking certainly is not a healthy choice. However hanging out with your peers for a few hours a night in public certainly is.

      Unfortunately I haven't found any place that cracks that problem in america, especially into the later hours. There isn't really a place for people to hang out and socialize without it being a boozy bar. As someone who doesn't really enjoy drinking I don't even really want to go to boardgame/chess/trivia nights at bars because I feel like I'm freeloading. ( I imagine any given bar patron is having 1-3 drinks per hour and potentially ordering some food if that is an option. I might order some food and have a soda...)

      I assume part of the problem being that alcohol has the helpful side effect of greasing the wheels socially. Coffee houses that are open late are generally library like affairs, a lot of people sitting around on laptops or with books, any attempt to start a more social night is, in my experience, refused because of this.

  • BolsunBacset5 hours ago
    The UK government hates its populace, particularly its natives. Downvote all you want.
  • 5 hours ago
    undefined
  • dgxyz6 hours ago
    Having watched two alcoholic family members die horribly, spurred on by functioning alcoholic friends whos only social interaction is at the pub through habit only, fuck 'em. Let them die.

    We need better social spaces which do not have the token cost of drinks to use.

    • antihero6 hours ago
      Ok so because your family were alcoholics nobody should have a space to drink? What an absurd thing to say.
      • dgxyz5 hours ago
        No I'm saying we have a social problem with alcohol in this country and brush it under the table as a cultural identity thing.
        • cyberpunk5 hours ago
          Its extremely hard to cope with how bleak life is in the UK without frequent intoxication (source: abandoned the uk, no longer drink at all)
          • dgxyz4 hours ago
            Fair. That's what they invented planes for :)
  • lacoolj4 hours ago
    Am I the only one that has no idea what this is talking about? Even the "About" section just dumps a ton of jargon about something being a problem for "pubs" - which, very unclear from the homepage, is actually talking about bars/places to drink beer/etc in the UK.

    But again, now I know it's talking about that kind of pub, what is the actual issue? Some sort of rate being added to something? What rate? Is this related to a rating system? Taxes? Is it affecting the consumer? The owner?

    So confused.

    • crazygringo4 hours ago
      Nope, I have utterly no idea what "rate increases" are being referred to. Doesn't seem to have a single explanation or link anywhere that I can find.
      • rzzzt4 hours ago
        A form of property tax it looks like, charged on businesses: https://www.gov.uk/introduction-to-business-rates
      • alexfoo4 hours ago
        To be fair, I'd say that most people in the UK who would be interested in the contents of this site are aware of the context and know what phrases like "rates increases" actually mean.

        It's been in the news quite a bit over the years since the pandemic.

        Not every site has to provide an ELI5.

        • crazygringo4 hours ago
          The homepage doesn't even say it's about the UK.

          For a generic ".com" domain that isn't American, it's generally a good idea to yes, have a kind of minimal hint that tells you at least which country it's about, and at least a single link you can follow to get the broader context.

          I'm following a link to it on HN. When I get there, I have zero context. Visitors to your site can come from anywhere, so it's generally considered a good idea to provide basic context.

          • alexfoo28 minutes ago
            > For a generic ".com" domain that isn't American, it's generally a good idea to yes, have a kind of minimal hint that tells you at least which country it's about, and at least a single link you can follow to get the broader context.

            Umm, I take it you didn't click the "About" link at the top right of the page. That gives you some of that context and names the countries involved in the first full sentence.

            Alternatively clicking on the "Map" link should give a sizable proportion of people a big hint about which countries it involves. Three seconds of scrolling out on the map makes it obvious.

            • crazygringo14 minutes ago
              "Umm", yes, that's why I referred to the homepage specifically.

              It's generally a good idea to make the subject of your site clear on the homepage, without requiring people to start clicking around to hunt for it.