One thing I’m curious about: how do you decide when the AI should intervene versus stay silent? In deep reading, timing matters a lot — too much contextual help can break flow, too little can frustrate.
Have you observed differences across use cases (e.g. technical papers vs. philosophy vs. fiction)? It feels like the “right amount” of AI assistance probably isn’t static and might depend on reader intent and text difficulty.
Interesting direction overall — especially the idea of AI as a reading companion rather than a replacement.