7 pointsby pseudolus13 hours ago4 comments
  • DivingForGold37 minutes ago
    I have owned and driven 4 Nissan 4 cyl. Frontier PU trucks in succession over 15 years for my small business, the most reliable PU I ever experienced. Drove each one 180K to 200K miles. before selling. As a younger man, I drove Chevy's, they were often needing work, some were "fix and repair daily" models.

    My 1st Nissan PU was a manual stick, hard to find, but ultra reliable since no automatic trannie to fail. Had to replace clutch every ~80K.

    All I ever did on the other 3 PU's with auto trannies was install an extra trannie cooler (after market), change tires, change oil every 5K with Mobil One synthetic, filters, change power steering and brake fluid every 2 years, change auto trannie fluid at 85K to 100K. None of the 4 were ever in the shop for any other repairs. Proper seat belt retraction was always a nuisance issue, Nissan has never solved it to my knowledge.

    Bought all of the Nissans used, with low mileage, except last one, none were available in my area from private sellers around Covid. Recently added a victory red 2007 Pontiac Solstice GXP turbo convertible to the mix, I found it with only 22K miles on it for $11,500.

    My best friend for >50 years used to sell cars at a dealership, he told me dealerships don't make hardly any money off selling cars for cash, most of their money is made off selling cars on finance and extra "options" on new cars - - - and selling service. I found ~30 years ago when I drove my Chevy into the Houston dealership for service I was lucky to survive with no less than a $400 bill, they always found items they claim need replacing. Cox Automotive, parent company of Kelly blue book says in 2026 the typical cost today for servicing your vehicle is $838 each time you take it in.

  • zippyman559 hours ago
    For years I had the worst car in the parking lot. Probably close to the highest salary too. I was amazed at the cost of the cars for even low level cars. I was also amazed at how people noticed when someone had a flashy car. I only got rid of my car when it was no longer safe to drive. Caveat: some large towns, you need a more reliable car. I get that. But I just can’t see paying over $30k for a vehicle, and for very local commutes, that $2000 car was fine.
    • tim-tday9 hours ago
      There’s a huge range of quality and reliability between $2k and $30k.
      • WarOnPrivacy8 hours ago
        > There’s a huge range of quality and reliability between $2k and $30k.

        True. I hear so many stories about car problems and having to fight with the dealer that all the stories run together. Last week I helped a client download the court docs from 2yrs of suing the MB dealership (so Gemini could parse them).

        Our last purchase was a 31k mi 1992 Buick w/ an Iron Duke for $1300. I loaded it w/ son #2s bedroom and drove it 1k mi to his new place. I spent a week visiting family in different states.

        Caveat that I did spent $80 + 20min to swap the alt (sticky brushes).

        The Buick replaced the 96 Toyota (bought @ 42k for $500 +$1k bc it sat for 10y). The Toyota runs great and never let me down (6yrs) but I wanted more leg room.

        In case I'm not completely unbearable, son #2's daily driver is a 63 Dart he pulled out of the weeds. He welded in tags to get a floor and just recovered the seats and door panels using a stack of my old blue jeans.

        He's drives it to RI (1.5k mi) every year or so.

      • zippyman557 hours ago
        I did caveat the location and the required reliability. Highway miles in a place Seattle would probably require a better car. Other places, like Santa Cruz or Monterey, CA can have a pretty dumpy car. I guess, if you have two cars, you may not need two $30K cars. But, I did put on 348K miles on my Madza B2000 truck and I think that cost me $5600 when I purchased it. But, it did get to a point of not being safe to drive.
        • seanmcdirmid7 hours ago
          Why would Seattle require a better car? Rain? You’ll see a lot of junkers out here without license plates on the freeway, the lack of weather beyond rain means you can get by with a Datsun 210 (I did in the early 90s) unless you like skiing.
  • tim-tday9 hours ago
    That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard.

    A high quality used car beats a new car for value 99 times out of a hundred. The only exception being the weird outlier that is rare and desirable enough to appreciate in the two years after sale. If you can spot those you already know more than me. (The Toyota Tacoma springs to mind)

    Look at prices for 20 year old cars. Find the cars tha have the highest resale value (avoid the ones that fall off a value cliff). Then find that one like that but five or ten years old, avoid the three main things that go wrong with that model and you’ve got a stable, reliable car that holds its value well. Maintain it and keep it clean. Drive it for five years and you’ll be able to sell it for almost what you paid for it, it’s basically free to drive for five years. This is called the value plateau. If you like it just keep it, the high value at 20 years means the maintenance costs are minimal.

    I’m currently driving a car that’s worth about as much as it was when I bought it 3 years ago. I’ve got a car I bought 8 years ago that’s worth more than I paid for it.

    Compare that to a $70k new car that is worth $20k five years later.

    Buying new cars is a suckers game. (Thanks to all the suckers for buying them because otherwise there’d be no used car market)

    Publishing an article saying new and used are comparable is idiotic at best.

    • seanmcdirmid7 hours ago
      You don’t know how the person who owned the car before you really treated it, so there is luck involved.

      And in a country like China you probably want to just buy new anyways, although car prices are much more sane there at the lower end.