9 pointsby chrisjja month ago2 comments
  • a month ago
    undefined
  • andsoitisa month ago
    > suppress free speech

    Without X, people can't speak their mind in public? Come on, dude.

    • chrisjja month ago
      I beleive the free speech he refers to is posting of undressed images.
      • apothegma month ago
        Of children. And deepfake revenge porn.
        • chrisjja month ago
          I doubt that, given the prohibitions he's got in the Grok EULA.
          • piratesa month ago
            The EULA is just there to keep up appearances. If he really cared he would have stopped this before it became widespread.
            • chrisjja month ago
              Neither he nor anyone else has the tech that could stop the legal use without also stopping the legal use.
              • chrisjja month ago
                Correction: Neither he nor anyone else has the tech that could stop the illegal use without also stopping the legal use.
              • apothegma month ago
                And yet some of the other AI developers have managed to at the very least make the illegal use a lot more challenging to achieve. And to enforce their ToS against those who do deliberately and persistently violate those restrictions and safeguards.
                • chrisjja month ago
                  > And yet some of the other AI developers have managed to at the very least make the illegal use a lot more challenging to achieve

                  ... yet remain unable to detect consent for an undressing, or age for CSAM.

                  As for violating safeguards, well, if they are violatable then they are not safeguards.