9 pointsby chrisjj19 hours ago2 comments
  • 17 hours ago
    undefined
  • andsoitis18 hours ago
    > suppress free speech

    Without X, people can't speak their mind in public? Come on, dude.

    • chrisjj18 hours ago
      I beleive the free speech he refers to is posting of undressed images.
      • apothegm18 hours ago
        Of children. And deepfake revenge porn.
        • chrisjj15 hours ago
          I doubt that, given the prohibitions he's got in the Grok EULA.
          • pirates14 hours ago
            The EULA is just there to keep up appearances. If he really cared he would have stopped this before it became widespread.
            • chrisjj12 hours ago
              Neither he nor anyone else has the tech that could stop the legal use without also stopping the legal use.
              • apothegm11 hours ago
                And yet some of the other AI developers have managed to at the very least make the illegal use a lot more challenging to achieve. And to enforce their ToS against those who do deliberately and persistently violate those restrictions and safeguards.
                • chrisjj10 hours ago
                  > And yet some of the other AI developers have managed to at the very least make the illegal use a lot more challenging to achieve

                  ... yet remain unable to detect consent for an undressing, or age for CSAM.

                  As for violating safeguards, well, if they are violatable then they are not safeguards.