He's framing Zoroastrian principles from ~2000BCE in an Abrahamic dichotomy. The underpinnings of his thought have been discussed for millennium by smarter people who aren't trying to sell you an online self-help course.
And if you’d really absorbed thinkers like Spinoza, Kant, Hume, or Leibniz, you’d know that reworking older metaphysical frameworks is literally how intellectual progress happens. Every major philosopher in that era built on ancient ideas — they didn’t sneer at people for revisiting them.
I don't have a paid course to sell you, I have a fucking life to live. That's why.
Go on, pay for his class and attain Hegelian enlightenment. He's a genius, after all.
Dismissing someone else’s work as “illegitimate” when you haven’t reworked a single idea yourself isn’t critique: it’s just opting out of the conversation while pretending you’re above it.P.S.: for you; the brain’s prefrontal cortex literally relies on pattern‑integration, not invention from scratch.